Profile of Mr Carmine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1289

General Information


Thread: For Mother Russia - working as intended?1 Jul 2021, 19:37 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jul 2021, 18:33 PMVipper I am not sure what your point is. Iyo is FMR a bad ability? Iyo the other abilities of the same class are better and yes which ones? Iyo is Counterattack Tactics as weak commander that need to a buff? You say its a usefull ability. That is true it affects more then just inf wich is great. Just i am not sure if and how a maxim will supress better with 50% accuracy buff. Sprint is the biggest part of the ability. Thats what gives the edge on a agressive mobile faction. For okw such abilities even sprint only out of combat can devastating because their guys can do their damage at max range. Their combat bonusses being lower during the ability shows that. But i agree with op that this nerf was the wrong way. Soviets are affected more with this kind of nerf/bringing in line. Them being in large a faction with short to mid range inf. faction wasent kept in mind here imo. Just ow hey thats different that isent right, while imo soviets play very different more so then any other faction. Nerfing the combat bonusses would have been the better choice. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: For Mother Russia - working as intended?1 Jul 2021, 17:23 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jul 2021, 17:06 PMVipper And what commander ability do grenadier have that gives them a speed boost and accuracy bonus? You got me on the grenadiers. Very good. Now how about the fact that this standardisation had the wrong impact as soviet units need to be closer to be a simaler threat. Also that basicly every axis tank has a pintle making it even easier to stop the sprinting from any direction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: For Mother Russia - working as intended?1 Jul 2021, 17:01 PM Yeah buffing not so great long range units long range dps is still usefull. But not nearly as usefull as buffing great long range units long range dps. His point still stands. This chance or standardisation doesnt fit the soviet faction. It has far greater negative impact then on other factions. Grenadiers volks obers for example dont suffer as much from stopping sprinting as all their weapons are lots better at max range. They will gets shot at at their prefered ranges when being forced out of sprint. At wich they do great damage with the ability active. Cons penals shocks etc dont get such an advantidge since they are short(er) range units. Their impact is far less at this moment. His idea of removing some combat bonusses in favor for movement buffs is sound. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Pathfinders need to be balanced23 Jun 2021, 16:47 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2021, 13:00 PMVipper This current moment there 6 thread buff allies/nerf axis and 4 thread buff axis/nerf allies in the first page. (Bunkers Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed? Easy 8 and 76mm Sherman Can be buffed bit more I think. E8 is still trash Does Axis save too much MP in team games? Could we just delete vet 1 ML-20 smoke barrage ?. ) vs (USF Pathfinders need to be balanced The devs did it again... Buffed B4 into the heaven The Stug E is still a terrible tank PTRS Penals and Soviet vs Ostheer balance) but if in your opinion it is quantity that matter and not the context you can start your own threads. Now can we pls toned down this axis/allied rhetoric and focus on the topics. You are blowing what i said out of preportion with the quantity remark. To me it seems you only respond when its a axis bias favor claim, i could be wrong here ofcourse. But you seemed to let the the allied bias favor slip and just respond to mine. Yes at this moment what is said is wrong. But in general it tends to be the case. The mods and the dev team imo are fair and as unbiased as can be. A lot if not most threads or responces however are are not. One side complains a bit more generaly. This has little to do with the quality of the posts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal versatility18 Jun 2021, 12:44 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2021, 21:50 PMrumartinez89 It could be balanced easily by making it part of the assault package which can lock out the AT upgrade. No yolo satchel. Yes thats the way to add it and fix it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal versatility17 Jun 2021, 16:02 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2021, 21:05 PMSkysTheLimit https://coh2.serealia.ca/ Relatively up to date if I'm not mistaken I think hoorah really makes a big difference though. Really useful for getting behind an MG, closing on a long range squad, etc. And in the end, just get shocks. They're just a better version of ppsh penals, whereas cons give more utility and a good discount compared to both I was quite suprised when penals lost oorah at vet. Bringing at back woudnt hurt imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback8 Jun 2021, 08:01 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2021, 11:44 AMDerKuhlmann My favourite thing was too hide in bushes throw rifles grenades and sprint over and finish them with g43s Nerfed/Nerfed/Nerfed Atleast i can stop playing coh after next patch. Lol when soviet stock or doctrinal stuff gets the triple nerf hammer its "bringing it inline and a long overdue improvement" lots of people defend these nerfs. Yet when specificly ost gets it its all salt and complaining and i am done with this game makes me laugh a bit. The way its communicated isent the way it should be indeed, but when people look the other way when it happen elsewhere but are suprised when it comes where they dont want it is unfortunatly typical imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback23 May 2021, 15:34 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2021, 14:39 PMFunPolice I mean doesn't 5 man grens help with the staying power a good amount? Like you don't get the DPS boost from the MG42 but with 5 men it's harder to lose grens and they have more health to stay in the fight. Tbh I don't really get all these calls to buff VSL again. Like we just got out of them being the dominating meta with the last patch and they are still a pretty common 1v1 commander. Do we really need to buff them and risk making them the meta again? Yeah sandbags and a 5th man are over the top. Vsl is fine as is imo. It makes them less prone to getting wiped as intended. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback23 May 2021, 12:25 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2021, 10:16 AMleithianz Almost all upgrades are like that. USF nades are only for the rifles, all elite commander inf. has nades anyway. volster/nades for UKF are as well(IS only). Only exception here is probably the weapon unlock for USF. The nade tech for usf unlocks the nade for rifles ans smoke for rear echelons afaik. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Team matches23 May 2021, 09:00 AM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2021, 16:06 PMPip Really, all games should the be treated as "Ranked". Stacking penalties (that decay after successfully completed matches) should be implemented to punish repeat leavers/griefers, while giving some leeway for people who bugsplat/have to leave very rarely for benign reasons. Though, i mean, even if you leave a game early for a "legitimate" reason, you still are ruining the game for the other 1-7 people involved, so some penalty kind of is reasonable/expected. Yeah that would be ideal. But imo big game modes are tilted towards axis to much. Because off this more skilled players and arranged teams flock towards axis. If this tilt isent fixed you cant balance or rank these modes and get a good distribution of skilled players imo. Also waiting times to joins games are already quite long. And i do have a strong online connection. In my case one of my kids presses the button on my pc sometimes when i am in a match... this will stop but it takes a few years i am afriad. Giving time penalties will incease it. But if the quality of games improves or you can finish games that would be fantastic. I am however a strong believer in not punishing some one for the mistakes or deliberate action of others. In: Lobby