Profile of jagd wölfe

Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2017, 19:21 PMzerocoh

It is a call in, do you even know what does that mean? Call in = click on icon and unit spawn at map, unlike other units that need to be built.

Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2017, 12:33 PMJustin xv

insaneHoshi you have 4000 games literally all as Axis, 90% as OKW. Every post you made should have a big red asterisk next to it.

The whole "get a TD and kite" is a very naive comment and clearly highlights your lack of any allied play.

Cloaked raketens are a thing. Any good player won't advance or over extend their KT unless they know for a fact they have raketen support.

There needs to be some sort of drawback for a player to call in the KT in its current state because right now it's literally an iWin button in most occasions.

Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2017, 14:39 PMEtherealDragon

That's kind of my point - you can't buff stuff willy nilly without changing other things or else you're more likely to upset the balance apple cart. The argument boils down to a few points.

1. The main reason for the crew nerf was that OKW got a special bonus of mainline infantry crewmen.
1A) So far I've yet to see anybody defend why OKW should get this bonus, which diminishes the reward you get for flanking support weapons - a key gameplay component- because the crew itself helps force retreats with it's higher than other faction's DPS.

2. This change doesn't affect the way the MG34 works as a HMG - it's suppression, etc. is completely unchanged from live game.
2A) It's suppression is pretty close to MG42, which I think everyone agrees works well as a supression platform.
2B) It's crew DPS in no way helps the MG-34 to function better as a suppression platform
2C) The only time crew DPS really matters is when it gets flanked which is pretty stupid because of point 1A

3.) The main arguments for buffing the MG-34 is that it's the worst HMG in game which is now even worse because of the crew DPS nerf.

4.) The balance implications of buffing the MG-34 itself has much more of an impact than nerfing the crew (which again, I'd argue is both neglible in regards to MG-34 performance and unneeded as a special bonus)

5) I agree that MG-34 is far from perfect or ideal as a HMG but buffing it directly as compensation for a nerf that isn't a huge nerf to it's current performance is pretty reckless given the infrequency of patches. Something a little more tame like reducing Veterancy requirements is the answer so that it can more quickly function better at higher Vet levels.

Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2017, 10:33 AMVipper

couldn't resist
Show Spoiler