Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 15:28 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 14:45 PMCrecer13 Dude, this is no longer funny how much you can justify shit design. I like the M5 Assault Group, post buffs. I liked the Recon Company AT Gun + Support Paratrooper airdrop too. Unit bundles, if priced correctly, can be both viable and strategically interesting. Sure, you could ditch the halftrack and just have Assault Guards, but then you'd just end up with another generic CQC unit. The price would go up because unbundled Assault Guards are overpowered at a 270 MP 0 MU price point. You'd just end up with another generic CQC squad. We've got loads of those. If you dislike unit bundles on principle, fair enough, but the M5 bundle is well worth its price in its current state. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 14:17 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 14:08 PMT.R. Stormjäger OR OR OR OR OR HEAR ME OUT OR We KEEP the assault group call in as an ability, but make Assault Guards buildable from T4 at a higher price than the call in (320mp). I mean, you could do that, and it probably would't hurt. Is it really necessary, though? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Simple Fixes: Tank Meta Issues19 Dec 2019, 12:39 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 12:38 PMT.R. Stormjäger Well which role is best for the Panther then? Expensive Sniper, weak to flanking Expensive hunter/diver, weak to flanking Current version which is underwhelming at everything The current Panther clobbers every medium in the game. It's not cost-efficient versus TDs, but the StuG and JPIV are. The problem is heavy tanks. The problem is always heavy tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 12:36 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 12:31 PMblancat buff assault guard(reduce cost or add some skill) done They did that in the last patch. They gave them three Thompsons and cut the cost of the Assault Group by 60 MP and dropped the CPs down to 3. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 12:25 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 12:24 PMKatitof And since you can't get them separate, that means you need to pay MORE then you would need to pay for shocks..... I mean yes, if you just suicide away the halftrack then they would be. But if you want Shocks, why are you playing Lend Lease again? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 11:48 AMCrecer13 You know that Assault Guard the are even more expensive and are delaying the construction of T3 and T4. and Again the ridiculous excuses of poor design. Why do you compare the Assault Guard with the Cavalry. The Assault Guard is comparable to the Shock Troops and Rangers / Paratroopers. And they do not cost 270m. they cost 510 + 30 their price can not be considered separately. When the HT is removed, you can talk about their price. Let's everyone call-in infantry arrive with the HT and fuel for the paratrooper squads - this is was is really, really good if you time it right, will reduce spam and delay the construction of all tiers for all fractions. The halftrack costs 240 30. The Assault Guards cost 270. Together, they cost 510 30. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 11:35 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 11:27 AMCrecer13 They are already useless. Take the Shock Troops - they are in many commanders, and they are better. Are you talking about some nerfs? On the contrary, I want a buff for them. and stupid design with HT prevents this. Justifying its fictional spam when comparable units do not have such restrictions. You know what Shocks also are? Expensive. You're not going to get a buff for a 270 MP 0 MU unit that's stronger than Cav Rifles. If you detach them for the halftrack, Lend Lease will be the meta doctrine for a patch and then they'll get nerfed. The M5 Assault Group is really, really good if you time it right. I see no reason to ruin it just because you personally don't like unit bundles. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 11:22 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 10:12 AMCrecer13 I played Lend Lease just yesterday and it’s absolutely not worth the price. Maybe for a fictional fight against spam, we will add fuel to the cost of Paratroopers and Fallschirmjager, because flying on an airplane will require a huge amount of fuel. Then play those docs. Leave my Lend Lease alone. I don't want my Assault Guards nerfed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 10:06 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 09:01 AMCrecer13 The Assault Guard costs 570 + 30. And there is the proof that you haven't even played the new Lend Lease. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework19 Dec 2019, 08:28 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 03:34 AMAcidfreak but you can only get one squad. Because you can't field more than 1 HT because it costs 30 fuel everytime. Also this squad has no useful ability. It has trip wires. We already have that on the stock soviet infantry (conscripts). Dhska replaced with 50 cal will go with the lend lease theme. Dshka was a soviet weapon. There are two things that makes the halftrack bundle that good. The first is timing: 3 CP is much earlier than SOV would usually get a Meat Chopper. The second is the Assault Guards. Yes, this squad doesn't have much by way of abilities, but nor do Rangers. After you subtract the halftrack, Assault Guards have three Thompsons and three SVTs for 270 manpower and zero munitions. That's a huge amount of mid-to-close range firepower for less than a Cav Rifle squad. If you make them individually buildable, you make them spammable. If you make them spammable, they get spammed. If they get spammed, they get nerfed. In: COH2 Gameplay