Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos29 Dec 2019, 20:32 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2019, 20:26 PMT.R. Stormjäger LMAO You poor child. If only you knew. The Paratrooper M1919 does less damage than the basic Paratrooper carbine at close range. So unless you want to make the claim that stock Paratroopers can somehow take down CQC troops, you can put your petty condescesion back in its box. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos29 Dec 2019, 20:11 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2019, 20:07 PMT.R. Stormjäger Imagine thinking Falls DPS are problematic but other squads like lmg paratroopers aren’t. LMG Paratroopers have no snares and no cloak. That means you can counterplay them with CQC infantry or light vehicles. If Thompson Paratroopers had cloaks and AT grenades, they'd be just as much of a problem as Falls are. Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2019, 15:02 PMZeroZeroNi Ok, but who says you have to stall for any units. But UKF have better infantry, better light vehicles, earlier mediums, A not so worthless panther, better elite infantry, much better rocket arty(doctirnal) than ostheer. How are they a BAD faction??? All these statements are either false or missing important context. Go buy and play UKF. Then you can talk about its balance state. If you're right and it's better Ostheer, isn't it your dream faction? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos29 Dec 2019, 13:38 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2019, 05:20 AMZeroZeroNi Sadly I don't have brits. Nor do i intend to. Those are some pretty hefty qualifications backing up your balance assessment of them. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos28 Dec 2019, 19:06 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2019, 18:42 PMZeroZeroNi UKF are not the worst faction. People just got used to how op sections were and are unable cope with this change. UKF is easily the worst faction and has been for years. That's rarely a controversial statement outside the most hardcore of faction one-tricks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos28 Dec 2019, 13:31 PM Yes. It's the faust. More specifically, it's the combination of high CQC firepower, cloaking and the faust. That combination gives you no hard counter until medium armour. That made them about as popular as snipers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing24 Dec 2019, 20:40 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2019, 01:02 AMT.R. Stormjäger How does Panther do against: "T34/85 with mark target" The Panther wins. Mark Target's +35% damage reduces the T-34/85's hits to kill the Panther to 5. The Panther then wins on its armour advantage. "Firefly with tulips" The Panther wins. Even if the Firefly lands both tulips, it's not enough to overcome the Firefly's glacial reload and the Panther's health advantage. The Firefly's strengths are range and burst damage, not slugging matches where it's taking fire. "Jackson on the move" The Panther wins. The Jackson has a large target size, which limits the effect of the accuracy disparity. The Panther's ability to take six hits to the Jackson's four wins out. "Also Easy 8 on the move" The Panther wins. If the E8 does not retreat, the Panther can simply hit Stop to avoid moving accuracy penalties. If the E8 does retreat, the Panther has the range advantage and can fire without being fired on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing24 Dec 2019, 01:00 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2019, 23:35 PMVipper It pretty simply C.Panther is overpriced compared to Command Tiger. An AT units should perform better than all-round unit vs vehicles if their prices is so close. I would so far as to say that Croc is also overpriced since with new AOE profiles Tiger/IS-2/Persing have way better AT and not that much less AI. I'm not talking about shoulds. I'm talking about does. The current Panther butchers every unsupported vehicle up to its price point but fares no better than a StuG pair (and apparently Pumas) against heavy armour. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing23 Dec 2019, 23:31 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2019, 23:29 PMVipper OKW do not have Stugs. If the C.Panther/Panther do not counter Super heavies than it simply badly designed and have the wrong cost. Finally mark target is not that great vs mediums it offer 15% better accuracy since the number of shot remain the same. OKW does have Pumas though. As for the effectiveness of the Panther and Command Panther against today's heavies, I wasn't aware their being not great at it was controversial. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing23 Dec 2019, 23:10 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2019, 22:42 PMVipper One can do that with cheaper JP. Panther is there to counter super heavies. C. Panther is simply way too expensive since it cost around the same as Command Tiger comes at similar CP and bring allot less to the table. Except the Panther doesn't counter super heavies. It's less effective than StuGs (and apparently Pumas) against >300 armour vehicles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Great OKW commander balancing23 Dec 2019, 22:06 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2019, 21:05 PMT.R. Stormjäger Dude Elite Armoured is insane. If they didn’t kill the Sturmtiger a few patches ago it would be better than GO. If the put in the 222 and fix the ST like I suggested, this becomes the best okw doctrine. No, I mean the two Pumas killed the Pershing without HEAT. They've got to be at point blank to do it (which is easier said than done in a real match) but at that range they kill it before it kills them. Not bad for, what, 140 FU? And that's not even using their control abilities. I think a balance pass through the LV and the StuG's control abilities could do a lot for light vehicles in the late game. In: COH2 Balance