Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Bayeux and Novgorod Outskirts ruin 1v118 Dec 2019, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2019, 17:42 PMCresc But if you want solid facts you can look at rosbonne's stats. This way we can bring back Karkov to 1v1, and have Crossroads removed from the pool. dear god why In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Lendlease rework18 Dec 2019, 17:40 PM Lend Lease is my favourite Soviet commander now. Every ability is useful. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Bayeux and Novgorod Outskirts ruin 1v118 Dec 2019, 10:55 AM Bayeux's quite big, which may not be to some people's tastes, but Novgorod Outskirts has literally nothing unusual about it. I'm slowly starting to subscribe to Tric's theory that whether or not people like a map usually depends on if they won or lost their first game on it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen snares17 Dec 2019, 16:01 PM I think the Vet 1 snares work fine. No need to overcomplicate things. What they could do with is having their shitty AT grenade swapped out for the Soviet one. The USF one is glitchy af. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock troop separate timer for grenades? 16 Dec 2019, 15:40 PM They tried separating the cooldowns, but it introduced a bug where Shocks could reset their cooldowns entirely. So unless you want Shocks with no grenade cooldown, they're staying shared. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis gets free stuff for teching12 Dec 2019, 14:24 PM Teching cost is misleading. What actually matters is unit timing, which has a lot more variables in it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The recent Infantry Sections nerf10 Dec 2019, 14:16 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2019, 11:18 AMblvckdream Universal Carrier durability upgrade? That would be super awkward and weird considering it's size and design. I don't see how this could be done. Smoke canisters (locked behind the Platoon Command Post) would go a long way. It'd allow it to flame out MGs without getting snared. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The recent Infantry Sections nerf10 Dec 2019, 11:12 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2019, 11:00 AMblvckdream Never gonna happen. Maybe a (much needed) mortar pit rework but that is the only thing I could see Relic allowing the balance team. There aren't any UKF LV available that could fullfill the role of a Luchs/T70 anyway and we all know there wont be new units implemented. The Valentine could do it. Durability upgrades for the UC could do it too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The recent Infantry Sections nerf10 Dec 2019, 10:44 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2019, 10:30 AMblvckdream Instead of overly complicated changes simply try removing the RA changes and keep the DPS changes as they are and see how that works out? Or alternatively keep the cover changes and revert the DPS nerf. Or we could give them a mortar and an anti-infantry LV that functions in the mid-game so they don't need to crutch on Section Spam. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The recent Infantry Sections nerf10 Dec 2019, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2019, 05:02 AMthedarkarmadillo barely function is the issue. for their cost and restrictions they are a joke and bolster is a requirement They'd be fine in any other faction. They feel weak because they have to be overpowered to compensate for the huge gaping holes in UKF's faction design. Either they need reverting and UKF goes back to being the Section Spam faction, or Relic needs to give up on this stupid 'no indirect is a good idea, honest!' design and give them basic tools. In: COH2 Balance