Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: FBP Update v1.28 Aug 2017, 09:14 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2017, 22:00 PMRedT3rror Got some news for you. The SU-76 has - 120 dmg until it hits vet2 - a very small firing arc - 400 hp which makes it a 3 shot vehicle, instant engine criticals, it also has just half the armor of the stug - inferior RoF ...while being cheaper, having more range than the stug and offering a free barrage ability to scare away the enemy. Su-76 has one of the lowest XP values for a TD even lower than an m20 and simply vet way to fast. In the patch by vet 2 its DPS vs Tiger is very close to that of Stug vs Comet. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Unofficial Revamp mod (EFA & WFA & Brits)8 Aug 2017, 08:49 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2017, 01:43 AMShadowLinkX37 Elite troops can fire bren guns on the move. Commandos can 2x equip brens and fire on the move. If you want to blob hard as UKF in teamgames commando with 2x brens + vanguard officer heroic charge is lethal. True and commandos have much better moving modifiers than Tommies. I was simply responding to an argument that: Tommies using bren, mills and Piat are affected by their very low moving accuracy and I was pointing out that since none of these weapon can be fired on the move by Tommies, they are not actually affected by it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: FBP Update v1.27 Aug 2017, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2017, 10:45 AMJohnSmith Read again : It's low priority. They won't change their priorities and unit focus because you argue schematics and the way things are worded in the patch notes. There's other important things than the su76. Maybe you should read again: "The prioritized scope for the team game related balance changes has been focused around Tank Destroyers & On-Map Artillery." Su-76 is a TD so it what the mod should focus on. Units that are is scope should be fixed regardless of priority because it might month before they enter scope again. BB for now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: FBP Update v1.26 Aug 2017, 10:18 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2017, 14:58 PMImagelessbean While it is pretty clear the Ost Panther needs help, it is a low priority since it has such painful impacts on team games. It needs a little more to bring it in line with the cost/tech but apparently that is not going to happen. We don't set the scope Relic does. So for the moment please focus on units we can change. This is not me saying that the Panther should not be in scope, only that it isn't so we need to move on. The fact that is not in scope is really strange since according to patch notes: "The prioritized scope for the team game related balance changes has been focused around Tank Destroyers & On-Map Artillery." and Panther is actually a TD. In addition since Tds are rebalanced the SU-76 and Su-85 should also be in scope. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: FBP Update v1.25 Aug 2017, 09:10 AM In FBP M36 combines highest moving accuracy, one of highest speeds and range 60, thus being able to kite the majority of enemy vehicles. Since its HP has gone up something has to give. If nothing else its speed needs to go down. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Conscripts need to be balanced4 Aug 2017, 17:05 PM Conscript do not need to be buffed. Simply all infantry available before minute 1 need to be rebalanced one vs the other. Having a single unit buffed or nerfed creates more problems than it solves. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FRP's in Fall Balance Patch3 Aug 2017, 17:39 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2017, 17:24 PMMr.Smith We couldn't get relic to accept the resource penalty idea. If you have any other ideas, we would love to try them out. Allow FRP points to work only in sectors adjacent to base sector or around a radius from base sector. The benefit will be there but it will less significant. In addition allow all faction to place a retreat banner with in their base sector. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: TDs vs mediums in Live and in numbers.3 Aug 2017, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2017, 16:15 PMJohnSmith You really should read up on statistical analysis. Have a look at t-tests, right now your calculations are wrong which leads to wrong conclusions. I told you that earlier in the thread. Calculating percentage difference will only reinforce your own biased hypothesis. DPS calculations also ignore a large part of the game, as others explained earlier. Feel free to provide the correct calculation and your conclusions and even your suggestions. Now I have responded to you for the next couple of days, so bb once more. In: Lobby
Thread: Opinion about cache in teamgame3 Aug 2017, 14:58 PM Cashes as an investment have a return value or time to return the original investment and start giving "profit". That time it divided by the number of player making a caches in a 4vs4 game far better investment. By increasing and lowering the return depending on number of players one can keep the difference in a lower level. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: FBP: M36 Jackson Discussion3 Aug 2017, 09:31 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2017, 09:18 AMsome one Jackson needs Increased accuracy Decreased Target Size why? In: COH2 Balance