Profile of Vipper

...Also why do axis infantry like fusilers and ostruppen always get a snare??? Allied call in infantry never does with the exception of AT Tommies that makes sense obviously. Point being their isnt even a down fall to calling them in when they still get a snare.

You mean like AT partisan that come with a snare and an AT weapons?

In which way ?

To me, removing the second bar is enough, the unit isn't overperforming in early game.

All infantry available before minute one should be re-balanced.

The performance of riflemen is actually tied to the rest of their units. If the rest of their unit continue to get buffed they should be nerfed since they are OP (by faction design) vs grenadiers (and thus Op generally since grenadier serve as the benchmark).

...
Thinking of infantry balance with "specific optimal" positioning for every mainline is an utopia and ectremely disadvantaged for factions like okw and isf that trade such dps curve versatility with shitty team weapons or late team weapons abd lack of specialized non doc cqb unit.
....

Its not a utopia and it has been done already once in the "Update September 9th, 2014"
https://community.companyofheroes.com/discussion/67/coh-2-changelog/p2.

The problems started when Tommies where introduced and where not balanced vs other infantries. And the problem become worse when USF got a mortar with toning down riflemen which where OP by design and when Penal where balance with riflemen in mind (and not grenadiers) and when Volkgrenadier where desinged in dealing with riflemen and Penals.

Repeating steps like these one:

"Infantry Combat Tuning
The intent of these changes is to better define the strengths and weaknesses of each core unit relative to one another. We wanted to better define how each core unit should engage their perspective targets. For example, in a Grenadier vs. Riflemen match up, the Grenadiers want to maintain range. This is now a valid tactic, where in the past it was not. An integral element to this iteration is the introduction of received accuracy in place of raw damage. This was used in instances where additional fire power was not necessary in maintaining the established unit relationships. For example, Grenadier long range fire power is high enough to establish the unit’s relative relationship with other units, allowing us to increase their durability instead. As a by-product of this shift, short and mid range units should have an easier time closing in on their target."

would greatly help the early stage of the game.

...
The idea of average at all ranges rather than specialized and extra good at X range is ok, the problem is extra good at all ranges, which isn't the case of penals and volks, but rifles.
...

Not it is not because "weapon profiles" goes along with "relative positioning" where a player tries to fight at the optimum range for the specific firefight. Mainline infantry that are good at all ranges like penal and STG V.G. make "relative positioning" a far less effective tactic since the enemy gains very little advantage regardless of range.

...
Stuka close air support comes with Tiger, cmon.

That is an error in commander abilities. "Stuka close air support" is available in other commander and they are far less problematic. The combination of g43/tiger/Stuka is simply OP.

But there are other commander with abilities that should not be available to them like stuka dive bomber and Elephant, T34/85/ISU-152 and mark target, Calliope and Recon plane (generally most abilities in the commander).

Think of it another way. What would happen if someone swamped p47 and stukas? The other Ostheer commander would become obsolete and Airborne would become OP.

Once more loitering planes need an overhaul...and some commander need to be redesigned.