Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: OKW Op.... really?7 May 2015, 22:31 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2015, 22:09 PMHawking I have no idea what this is aside from being the greatest thing ever In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to make unloved units viable?5 May 2015, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 19:14 PMMadeMan For the SU76 I would just make it significantly cheaper. I feel like this should be a spam unit, since it does everything but not very well. Just make up for it in numbers. If they reduced the fuel cost to 50 and maybe the MP cost a bit, but left everything else the same I would try to use it. You could have, like 5 of them out at any given time in that situation. Eh, I'd say it'd have to have the pop go down by at least one too then. 'Cause I'd still take two 34-76s over three SU-76s (in pop) any day. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to make unloved units viable?5 May 2015, 18:22 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 18:16 PMCarlos Danger The StuG should perform exactly like the Panzer IV without a turret, possibly with a smaller profile size. Otherwise same gun, same armour, same vision, etc. I'm pretty sure they're not going to make a unit that's exactly the same as another unit sans turret and pintle-MG upgrade. That's probably going to be considered insufficiently interesting. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers4 May 2015, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 20:47 PMZyllen Then obers should be brought back pre nerf. No. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifleman cost-effectiveness4 May 2015, 20:29 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 20:20 PMdaspoulos Its like saying panzerfussiliers should get flamethrowers. Everythng should get flamethrowers And the soundtrack should just be Ring of Fire on repeat In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Crawling Penal Satchel Charge Party Patrol4 May 2015, 19:30 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 18:07 PMNuclear Arbitor keep it in your pants then A master of the mixed message he is In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can Relics roadmap resurrect coh2?4 May 2015, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 15:32 PMspajn I don't think anyone wants coh2 stripped down of all its rng mechanics until its a ww2 version of starcraft2 but there are many things they could have done and still do to provide with more responsive squads, better readability, less bs-rng and interesting tech choices. One thing that always annoyed me is Relics refusal for different infantry camo-pattern or even realistic uniforms in the name of readablity but had no problem doing blizzards which is breaking every rule of good readability. That's not a problem with readability, that was just a problem with gameplay flow. You'll still see the units fine in a blizzard, they'll just move like molasses. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The OKW conundrum4 May 2015, 01:59 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 01:49 AMZyllen Im not interested to know if you can have all your tech im interested to see when you reach the point when you can start producing your tanks. for most factions its pretty much equal. Because it's totally useless to be able to get an artillery vehicle or long-range tank destroyer later...try going without AT guns as Allies before you declare backteching as OKW is frivolous (and of course even if you don't build anything from the building, the building still heals+reinforces/repairs/giant flak gun). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How will UKF be sold?4 May 2015, 01:42 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 01:37 AMThoseDeafMutes Can you hear that? Is that an over-half-full glass? Are you saying you're optimistic? In: Lobby
Thread: Stug E and Target Weak Point4 May 2015, 01:35 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 01:22 AMThoseDeafMutes Is the E the tiger doctrine one? Or the stock one? Mechanized Assault's one. In: COH2 Balance