Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Not yet, and we can't judge the performance of a unit that doesn't exist yet.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Top 100 AT 4v4? Almost entirely a matter of playing enough matches with the same 3 people
Top 100 Random 4v4? I'll let you know if I ever get there, but it mostly seems an exercise in masochism
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 503
Posts: 47
Infantry sections are best in cover and on the move they are abysmal.
4 
Posts: 3548 | Subs: 2
Since we're talking ranks, I always assume "competitive" part, which isn't possible to achieve without AT.
So yeah, I meant AT.
I don't consider RT games as competitive-or to be specific-I don't believe you can be competitive in any team game without a proper, coordinated team mate(s).
Posts: 721
True, but pandering to a select few won't be successful for this game. It never will be included in E-Sports and trying to be won't get anywhere, not with the size of this playerbase.
"Professional" competition can destroy games imo. If you want to be a "pro" and give "pro" advice, go and play DoTA or CoC as far as I'm concerned. That's where the activity and money is..
Top 100 AT 4v4? Almost entirely a matter of playing enough matches with the same 3 people
Top 100 Random 4v4? I'll let you know if I ever get there, but it mostly seems an exercise in masochism and persistance
Posts: 2561
Agreed, and it will never be esports as long as unit performance keeps changing with every patch. I don't wish for CoH2 to become esporty since that has only taken cool stuff away from the game so far.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
No the game won't be an e-sport because it's not popular enough. You can't create a e-sport scene through balancing and reducing rng. Competitive players don't magically appear because of consistency.
Popularity creates a e-sports scene. E-sports scenes don't create popularity. At least not until you reach a certain point of popularity coh2 is no where near.
Posts: 738
Posts: 156
 | Playercard of Seismic Squall | |||||||||||||||||||
|
4 Posts: 474
"No Longer can auto face"
Is just me or is this the biggest nerf to Howie/LeIG?
Posts: 431
Posts: 1273
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Removing autoface is a stupid, unnecessary micro tax. >.>
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 156
For the 1000th time, do you feel micro taxed when you have to relocate manually AT guns or HMGs?
Why would it be any different to another weapon with displayed arc then?
| Playercard of Seismic Squall | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1273
Posts: 22
Posts: 156
Mortars already come with a circle to display their range. Howies and leIGs should have a circle too if they were intended to auto-face..
| Playercard of Seismic Squall | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
All weapons have an implicit firing arc. Why not disable auto-facing for mortars?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2561
Mortars have their own animations. They are able to turn without unpacking (they just pick up the mortar and put it down).
Why do mortars have a circle and not an arc?
 |
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
300 | ||
 |
|
|
207 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
