Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback
Posts: 479
Posts: 133
On top of that Jaeger Armor is just gonna get to keep its AT strafe? This commander is massively over picked in team games yet we’re not gonna remove that ability? The sporting scope nerf was nice to see but the commander is still gonna be way to good unless the AT strafe is removed.
Beyond those I’m also a bit sad a few commanders aren’t receiving any love from the updates.
Joint Operations I honestly think is gonna suffer because it’s being overloaded with abilities that are so expensive to invest into. It’s rare to get a Pak 43 and LeFH 18 together in a match but now you also have them a third thing to get. I would’ve preferred seeing the PaK 43 replaced with the resupply station to leave the light artillery barrage in.
Mobile Defense still seems like the Puma timing is to late to where it just won’t be useful. I wish a faster timing was at least tried out rather than just never pushing it.
Close Air Support would’ve benefit massively from the Luftwaffe Field Officer also in place of like the AI strafe. You would still get that but also some extra abilities on the commander. It also fits really well thematically due to well, the ground forces calling in air support. It would give this underused commander at least a little more power.
Assault Support also could’ve probably used a small tweak because it’s overshadowed by the spearhead doctrine. Both have a Tiger and frag bombs as a big selling point but spearhead does this overall better. Giving it an off map that tackles a different problem (like an AT strafe so it can push away enemy armor rather than drag bombs which mess up AT guns) and you would help this commander imo.
Posts: 163
Mechanized getting the LeFh back seems like a weird choice to me. Like I think having 3 LeFh commanders is a good thing but I would’ve said put it back in Festung Support rather than Mechanized. Speaking of Festung Support I also really hope something can be done to make the forward resupplly station buildable without needing an ambient building. The repair bunker is really random in solving that issue.If jaegar armor still have elefant, spotting scope and recon planes even with only this 3 skill it will still gonna be meta in team games
On top of that Jaeger Armor is just gonna get to keep its AT strafe? This commander is massively over picked in team games yet we’re not gonna remove that ability? The sporting scope nerf was nice to see but the commander is still gonna be way to good unless the AT strafe is removed.
Beyond those I’m also a bit sad a few commanders aren’t receiving any love from the updates.
Joint Operations I honestly think is gonna suffer because it’s being overloaded with abilities that are so expensive to invest into. It’s rare to get a Pak 43 and LeFH 18 together in a match but now you also have them a third thing to get. I would’ve preferred seeing the PaK 43 replaced with the resupply station to leave the light artillery barrage in.
Mobile Defense still seems like the Puma timing is to late to where it just won’t be useful. I wish a faster timing was at least tried out rather than just never pushing it.
Close Air Support would’ve been fitted massively from the Luftwaffe Field Officer also in place of like the AI strafe. You would still get that but also some extra abilities on the commander. It also fits really well thematically due to well, the ground forces calling in air support. It would give this underused commander at least a little more power.
Assault Support also could’ve probably used a small tweak because it’s overshadowed by the spearhead doctrine. Both have a Tiger and frag bombs as a big selling point but spearhead does this overall better. Giving it an off map that tackles a different problem (like an AT strafe so it can push away enemy armor rather than drag bombs which mess up AT guns) and you would help this commander imo.
Posts: 1594
I assume because the weapon upgrade icon has a scope. I've asked the UI guys to remove that on all the "assault rifle" profile G43s. And to add a passive UI icon (similar to the elite Bren/bazooka icons) for the sniper variant on JLI.
This would be a nice stopgap, if nothing else. I'm reasonably sure some of the unit descriptions (Fusiliers in particular, i believe) describe G43 upgrades as "long range" focused, as well. If someone could go through the unit card descriptions/weapon upgrade information and make them less misleading that really would be fantastic.
Hell, I'll do it for you guys if you like. Do you have a plaintext of the current unit descriptions or anything of that sort? I'd be happy to go through them all and provide some more accurate information for players.
Posts: 322
What should imo be included in the Patch
MOP
Reduce cost of flare it too expansive compared both to Soviet mortar and UKF early warning.
Yes! Make it cost 30muni, same range and visibility as Soviet Mortar's Flare and we are good to go!
Please, I really love the ideal of MOP but right now 50muni Flare is simply not worth it.
Posts: 133
If jaegar armor still have elefant, spotting scope and recon planes even with only this 3 skill it will still gonna be meta in team gamesIt would still be strong but maybe not so overwhelmingly picked without a off map that wrecks vehicles. Like the other elefant commander might be a tad more pickable if Jaeger lost it's off map
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
anyone feels this commander patch changes too many things, hard to keep track and adjust my gameplay
Ironically other people think it changes too little lol.
I mean there will be a settling time after the patch is officially released where the new "meta" is adjusted so you'll get your chance then.
Posts: 857 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4928
I assume because the weapon upgrade icon has a scope. I've asked the UI guys to remove that on all the "assault rifle" profile G43s. And to add a passive UI icon (similar to the elite Bren/bazooka icons) for the sniper variant on JLI.
Good point, although the model has a scope I didn't think that many people would have looked at it that closely, but the icon might mislead people, and when that misinformation gets into shoutcasts the waters get real muddy.
Posts: 4928
Posts: 556
Why does the TIgerAce still have 13CP? Is this intended or just a bug? It only had 1 more CP than the normal Tiger for years. 2 CP difference would be completely unjustified.
And it still consistently hits the literal dirt under the SU-85s for some reason.
Posts: 2
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
As for the G43's weakness, while this might be extreme, what if the DPS profile was changed to that of the SVT-40 rather thna the M1 Garand? The SVT-40's damage curve would lend itself to improved mid and long range performance which could help the G43 stand out. The downside of this is that the Panzerfusilier and Panzergrenadier G43's might need touched up to prevent it from being overbearing. On the other hand it would give an opportunity to try the bonuses vs cover again.
SVT profiles is actually bad because it too linear and that creates less difference with other weapon reducing the importance of relative positioning.
If one profile has to change that is of the SVT.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If one profile has to change that is of the SVT.
And its one profile that will not be changed, because there is no reason to, its a unique profile in the context of the army, giving unit a unique role and nothing else really matters here, other factions weapons are completely irrelevant.
This goes for G43 as well, it couldn't be any less relevant what other factions have, only what the weapon can offer within the faction it is.
Posts: 4928
SVT profiles is actually bad because it too linear and that creates less difference with other weapon reducing the importance of relative positioning.
If one profile has to change that is of the SVT.
Surely that means you advocate giving them M1 Garand DPS at close range? Of course the alternative is that their close range DPS remains the same but their mid and far range DPS drop dramatically, becoming even lower than Conscripts at far range, that couldn't possibly be what you're implying. The SVT-40 is fine, and the Jaeger G43 may benefit from a damage curve like it.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Surely that means you advocate giving them M1 Garand DPS at close range? Of course the alternative is that their close range DPS remains the same but their mid and far range DPS drop dramatically, becoming even lower than Conscripts at far range, that couldn't possibly be what you're implying. The SVT-40 is fine, and the Jaeger G43 may benefit from a damage curve like it.
My point is that linear DPS profiles are not optimal and Relic had a reason for using curves instead of lines.
Pls do not get me started about Penals especially since this is OStheer thread. (they are badly designed in sort)
At this point ostheer G43 is a lost cause and it would easier to simply replace it with a new squad.
Livestreams
16 | |||||
12 | |||||
151 | |||||
9 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.483190.718-1
- 4.587233.716+3
- 5.1095612.641+19
- 6.893399.691+3
- 7.280162.633+8
- 8.1004649.607+5
- 9.304113.729+4
- 10.379114.769+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Rrdcxsdfvf
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM