From what i can remember:
STG: when you compare them between Sturmpio, PG, Volks and Obers.
Mosin: when you compare Guards vs anyone else
The only "real" outlier here is the Obersoldaten, really, and in their case they DO have a different weapon. The IR STG is obviously something different to a "regular" STG, even to the casual observer.
Regarding the Mosin: They're still broadly the same weapon among all users, they're merely more effective in the hands of differing units. The inconsistency here is the Guards' improved moving accuracy, not so much the performance. What i'm pointing out is mostly
I would agree that I should like to see some of the less glaring outliers brought a little more in-line, or at the VERY least there being actually accurate explanations on the unit cards for these weapons. There are so few weapons in the game that some degree of differing statistics are unavoidable, but in the case of the G43 in particular: There's already a viable alternative. The STG (Or the IR STG, even. That'd still be less stupid than them all having weird assault-rifle scoped G43s)
PTRS.
Guards one actually hits and kills infantry.
Congratulations, the PTRS acts the same between the two units, one is simply more accurate. Are you intentionally missing the point here, or do you genuinely not understand it?
USF carbine vs elite carbine.
Wow! Again, two weapons that are different in that one is "better" in the hands of elite infantry, not that they actually act differently in a meaningful way.
Soviet guard mosin is actually good on the move as well as long range, while con mosin is mid/close range primarily(yes, you can use it at long range too, but we're talking scenarios, where you wouldn't lose more then gain from engagement).
The Guards' mosin is the same type of weapon as the Conscripts' mosin. It is better at range thanks to it simply having higher DPS in general.
The higher moving accuracy is something I was unaware of though. That is a nonsensical inconsistency.
Weapon crews have completely different curve then their mainline equivalents.
You and I have a very, VERY different interpretation of the words "Completely different".
LMGs behave very different when used on certain elite infantries(either massive performance boost, as with ober 34 or firing on the move which is not possible for regular infantry).
The first actually relevant example, though one I already mentioned.
There is also BOYS AT rifle which behaves completely different on sniper and completely different on AT tommy section.
Correct, and this is also retarded, particularly as the Boys isnt even scoped. The UKF sniper should just have a scoped enfield and come at tier 0. This is literally the only example you've provided that's actually what I'm talking about.
Flamethrowers behave completely different depending if infantry uses them or vehicle.
"Flamethrowers" are a class of weapon, not a specific weapon. There isnt an inconsistency between infantry and vehicular flamethrowers, they arent the same weapon. If some vehicular flamethrowers do leave pools of flame, and others do not, then this would be an inconsistency that should really be looked at.
Just because you don't see the point, doesn't mean its pointless. It simply means you lack the capacity to grasp broader picture.
But don't worry, this is exactly why forums exist, if you ever feel confused again, post a thread in strategy section and someone will explain to you how things work and you will no longer be confused.
The broader picture being what, exactly? You keep pretending you're far more in the know than anyone else, but you really seem to be unable to ever back this egocentrism up. Please feel free to go into detail.
I think most players who actually use them in game quickly get the grasp of what the weapon can do, you'd have to be exceptionally smooth brain nugget to not tell the difference between gren G43 and sniper G43, I mean sure, there are people who can't tell, but game isn't exactly balanced with intellectual amoebas in mind.
And yet people are constantly misunderstanding the various G43s. Weird, isnt it; Almost like you're entirely unable to see the issue because you already know the trick.
Most players, until it is /specifically/ pointed out to them, believe the G43 to be a long-ranged weapon, regardless of who wields it.
Different troops with different purpose on the battlefield used same weapons.
Not every unique unit got snowflake fallshirmjeager treatment in ww2, where they got unique snowflake weapon designed just for them.
This literally has nothing to do with anything. Congratulations on the non-sequitur.
All, front line grenadiers, cannon fodder volksgrenadiers and snipers used both Kar98s and G43s.
So not only it makes complete sense why different units would use same weapons but use them in different ways, its hostoricaly accurate as a cherry on top.
Cute, but not the case. You're welcome to provide some historical basis for CQB assault troops being assigned scoped G43s, of the same configuration that were assigned to Snipers.
You know what assault troops actually got given? SMGs and STGs. You know what would better fit the profile of what Grenadiers, Pgrens, and Stormtroopers get, given their G43s act as what could be easily described as "Assault rifles"? STGs.