Profile of GachiGasm

Tbh here, I've watched more of the videos (because I have nothing to do, duh), and really it feels like Asha and Brosras are just witch hunting. They are nitpicking EVERYTHING and this whole document is made in such way to put Seeking in a bad light.

Out of ALL clips, there are only few really fishy ones, while other clips are just Brosras having a butthurt and recording litteraly everything.
Some of the clips are just complete BS, which even noob like me can explain.

Like this. And its not a "random clip" is in a "original 15 cases". Like ffs, he is looking in FOW to aim his stuka. I myself usually do the same, looking into fow even before stuka arrives to think about how and where I should shoot it.
Show Spoiler

All of this makes an "anouncement" to have a solf-public witchhunting and shaming context. Almost all of the clips are from the same pre-made, who is obviously witchhunting and giving objectively retarded clips, bunched up with fishy ones.

So here is my questions:
1) Why "witchhunt clips" are not sorted out from really fishy ones.
2) Why not a single of judges gave an explanation and reasoning why he is cheater. Not in the forum or discord but in the document. Creating the feeling that all of the clips are considered "proving" ones, which is again obviously not true.
3) Why even AE is bringing up clips which are BS and litterary makes a mistakes in his video multiple times (like saying AT guns never shot a brumbar while even in clip it was shot twise).

Thing is I dont even know who Seeking is, but all this representation and "public drama" is creating feeling that, you just need to have more community members call him a cheater.

And considering they will see their favorite streamer\player call him a cheater in a document, they will say that Seeking is a cheater. Or they are 4 digit players, who will also call him a cheater because they wont even understand that 90% of the "evidence" is complete shit.

This leaves me with a final question. With all this lack of professional aproach and explanations, not from the suspect but from the accusers, why this is even given in a such way to an upreparaed public? Did you want just ban him or you want to create a drama for your own liking.

It just triggers me, that instead of prepering normal and noob-friendly article, all the top figures did just has thrown and upprepared accusing document into the public. All this could have been done more professionally and quite, but I think main goal was to make as loud as possible.

Honestly a bit BS. Not to question "gods" of coh2. But how did they determine if he is cheater or not?

I mean fist clip with AT.
1)Random shot with Bumbar into clocked AT gun, ye suspesious. But shooting when they are retreat, AE says AT guns werent shooting, but they did shoot brumbarr twise.
2) Sniper. Really cant say at all, because we dont know how this Axis guy played. Maybe he was always standing this bushes. And regarding sov sniper movement, I looks more like a nerd play, instead of Maphack.
3) Pathfinder clip, well alright no explanation here.
4) MG42 clip. MG42 crew litterly shot him. And you can see 1 MG42 crew model moving for into vision just before rifle movement.
5) Litteraly started moving MG42 when 50.cal appeared on the middle and started shooting.
6) AT gun clip is suspecious. But again, we dont see full replay, if he knew there was an AT gun, then he could have predict it, because if this AT gun would be been retreated to the enemy base he would have notice it (because his inf was moving behind possible reteat path), so the only place AT gun could have been is on the map edge.
7) Well yes, kinda suspecious, but nothing special.

I mean, maybe he is a cheater, but the clips chosen by the AE are like insanly easy to explain. Proves like nothing.
6

Speaking of ST to Break and JT to Elite armor.

Dont you think its an overkill? I mean, Elite armor already buffs your tanks, has income unit (which is LV aswell) and on top of that JT.

I mean, it will be no-brainer pick for teamgames.

Isn't it a good thing that factions have to pick and choose which strength to accentuate and what weakness to shore up?

Its a good thing, when you have options both of which will give you significant strength and weakness as a trade off.
Lets say, if you get early nades for IS\Rifles. They will give you strength in terms of how you can get units out of cover and disadvantage will be that you delayed bolster\LVs.

In this situation, volks dont have any upper hand over early USF\UKF and sandbangs is more of a nessesity for volks, rather then a chose and even with sandbags its not garanteed that you will win the engagement.

I still wish Guards were Nondoc and Penals had some other role than trying to be an AT squad, but this is extremely unlikely to happen.

I was always wishing soviet T1 had and upgrade simular to AEC\Bof chosing between guards or shocks making them stock, and T3 requiring both T1 and T2, so T1 would be a part of your tech always.

Sadly never gonna happen.