Profile of GachiGasm

What I really dont like regarding population, which is often is ignored completly, is the way how UKF and USF works.

If we take Sov\Ost\OKW we will see that, all three of the factions are much more inf based then both USF and UKF.

To be more clear, all of the mentioned factions have mainline inf be it Cons\Grens\Volks, usually you will have 4 of thouse BUT all three of them have limited scale. Meaning that on top of the them you will also have to have somesort of other more elite inf be it Guards, Shocks, PGs, Obersts, Fallsh or Jaegers.
USF and UKF on the other hand dont need it.

Without jumping too deep into how factions plays and speaking of standart army roster, all 5 factions generally expected to have pretty much even amount of LVs, support weapons and other units which take pop-cap and they all are relatively in the same pop-cap category with their counter-parts or lets say unit classes.

You usually hear "Well get Obersts, well get guards, well get PGs", but they are not pop-cap free, quite opposite actually they are very pop-cap heavy 2 squads of each takes 18 pop-cap from you on top of the x4 7 pop-cap for any other mainlines.

In other words it can take 28 pop-cap for UKF and 39 for USF (counting 1 officer+Major, since they are part of tech) to have complete inf army, while for other factions it takes at least 48 pop-cap.
And again this is excluding all the other units, nessesery support weapons, engis and other stuff, but as I said, its pointless to compare them because they have relatively same pop-cap and pretty much same amout of them usually are on the field.

I dont see how CB gives you only clicks savings really. CB start stracking and shooting, the second enemy arty unit start firing. Tracking ability, as shown in the video, is cool but your LeFH wont be facing frontline in a wrong direction.

Your LeFH will be facing the front line. Not a single arty unit in the game, be it katy\cali\SPGs\Mortars wont be able to finish their barrage before LeFH start firing. Meaning that either enemy will cancel and waste barrage or he will potentually lose a unit.

In other words, IF your LeFH facing in a right directrion (or close to it), it will immidiatly fire at the enemy arty unit, the second it use its abilities.

Sure good players can do it mannuly BUT good players will see enemy arty unit only if it hit something, if it just fire somewhere without hitting anything, you wont see it. Sure you can hear the sound, you can calculate where it stays in FOW, but you cant do it faster then CB. It doesnt matter how good player is, its just not possible.

And on a side note, after you counter pottential hight value targets with CB, you can just disable it.

Ppl here acting like its a one time ability, which if activated cant be turned off. Its not, its situational. And I'm pretty sure, even a good top players are using it, when there is enouth reason to do it. Thats the main concern.

Sure noob will activate it and forget about it, good player will activate it if he sees that it makes sence, if its not he will deactivate it and fire mannually.

I agree with their sentiment that the "CB requires no micro" argument is totally overblown. It saves you a grand total of three clicks and some map awareness while targeting whatever it wants, which might be a lone mortar squad, when a well placed regular barrage in a target rich environment would usually yield better results. And something being micro-less isn't really the best argument against it, because autofire for many units (mortars etc) is equally micro-less.

I would like to replace but, but actually because I think the ability is meh (it won't hit its intended target most of the time), not overpowered or whatever.

Actually, while you are right, you are also a bit wrong. On paper yes, but in practice, at least in 3v3 and 4v4, CB can be used with great results anyway.

Even if a player knows about the existance of LeFH with CB, its still hard to track it down with everthing else happening on the field. Plus on top of that nature or 3v3 and 4v4 maps, will usually allow you to bombard a choke points resulting some damage.

On top of that, you can just leave LeFH for a while on CB just to vet it up quickly and then comeback to in ones it vet 3.

It gives a lot of pressure for your opponent basically without any input from you. Not to mention, that few clicks arent big deal when nothing is happening, while few clicks during fights + precision of them are really helpfull.

One can make TDs have higher TTK vs medium without affecting the TTK vs super heavies.

A) Lowering far accuracy will effect the shot vs medium more than it will effect shot vs super heavies.

B) Increasing damage but lowering ROF can be used to keep the number of shot the same vs meduim and the TTK about the same vs Super heavies.

It sounds good on paper, but when it comes to actual game I dont see how this can be properly implemented, because its a hell of a task to do right.

Because all this system will either requare consistency or it should be heavily RNG based.

Since slightly tweaking a ROF values (like T70 was brought to 2.6 reload always), wont cut it in such system and potentially requare a lot of work and testing to be done properly. Otherwise you either end up with a useless or batshit OP tds

Also faction roster should be taken into the consideration. I say Firefly is the closest to such TD design, but unlike USF\Sov UKF arent relying on TDs for their late game to begin with, so they can afford having such TDs. On the other hand Soviets and USF are relying on Jackson\SU85 (aside from AT guns) for their late game, because they dont have good AT medium outside of commanders to fight something fatter then PIV.

Hell even KV-1\8 is giving problems to Ostheer, because it almost shut downs whole T3, because AT guns arent that relyable vs Heavy tanks, if they are not massed.

theres a bit of a discrepancy here... the most survivable ones you are allowed double of? at the absolute most any axis team could field is 4 but the allies could field 8? what in the actual fuck?

Because mobile howis, has much less range then static ones, meaning that they are tecnically much easier to conter and dive for. Not to mention, that countering thouse one arent requare specific commander choses to counter.

They might have more survivability on paper but is a bit of overextension. Yes, static ones are very easy to destroy but ONLY with commanders and muni to spend. When you dont have thouse options, they are litteraly uncounterable in teamgames.

Not to mention that they are more expensive and I litterary said that player could have 2 of them for the significant cost of pop-cap, considering all the advantages and disadvatanges.

Plus on top of that, unlike ML-20 and LeFH both Prist\Sexton arent presented in a shit load of commanders. And USF\UKS are lacking in terms strong non-doc inderect fire units, so they can have it a bit on easier side.

But sure, if you want to bring Prist\Sexton on the same perfomance level (or at least close to) of ML-20\LeFH it sure can be limited to 1 per player.