Profile of GachiGasm

...

Well maybe, I dont play CSGO, so i'm not intirely sure how it works. I've red an article and watched some videos in before, and I thought that it requare all investigator to call suspect guildy. Also speaking of F2P, I also thought that they review only more or less hight ranked games. Aswell as more expirienced investigators reviewing more hight rank games. But I might be wrong here.

Most people found Seeking guilty. Simple. Issue a ban, but don't drag this out publicly.

It would have been logical solution, but problem is, in CSGO, for excample, judges are unbiased. They dont even know nick name of suspect and they rotate + they are part of the Valve sistem.

In coh2, we not only dont have unbiased opinion because each of the top player know each other, but also we have very few of them. Even in this situation, half of the clips (even from top players) are completly useless and were captured only because they were salty with a thought in their mind that Seeking is a cheater. This move already sabotaged whole proccess. And top players (nor, as it seems, community contributors) are part of the Relic system, which means they cant ban someone only based on their opinion.

Its a double edged sword. On the one hand I fully agree that this should have never been public, on the other hand almost all top players called Seeking a cheater, while after all this drama case was droped because of the lack of evidence. Wasnt it not been public, seeking would have had status of a cheater, but as I said previously he still wouldnt have been banned, because Relic themselfs didnt find anything worth banning.

Problem with your statement, is that if we start issuing bans based on opinion, then pretty much everybody can be banned because of an RNG or lucky guesses. Lets say, we all report to sturmpanther, and during my 100 games, I had 10 really lucky moments, which are very fishy. Then sturmpanther have all rights to issue me a ban, because he didnt see all other 90 games and his oppinion will be based only on 10 games. But based on thouse 10 games I would look like a cheater.

I don't really understand the needs to make the scott trash. The main complaint I've heard is that it kills the infantry too fast or wipes squads entirely. Would be fair, if it wasn't for comparable terrors like the brumbar.

You probably never saw how USF abused it in team games. Wiping every living shit out of inf in seconds, without any counter play and ability to kill it (because its being protected by teammates). At least brummbar has to be in range of AT weaponary in order to attack.

It was seeking's explanation "I fired as soon as I saw it" that made the clip so suspicious. But of course the answer can totally be blamed on nervousness, as others have mentioned

Well maybe he indeed fired as soon as he saw it. Like lets say, we consider that he saw the blob (which he did, due to kimbo clip) and then just fired at the most likely path where blob could be.

Its just a matter how you phrase it and how you understand it. Maybe he ment that he saw it before via Kimbo sight, maybe he just dont remember how he saw it (being sure that he saw it), maybe knowing that there is blob comming he click the ability and was aiming on the road as "as soon as he saw" the first model he fired. There are a lot ways to interpret this phrase.

For me personally the most sus clip was, the brummbrar trying to prefire moving AT gun in fow and then canceling it. Considring there is a bush on the way you can crush and the fact that brumm was perfectly allined to this bush plus pressing attackground and the canceling it, makes it really sus af.
Because you cant do all of this as a random action.

But seeking was already claimed cheater just because of the mainstream katy clip.

You will not believe who needed them, the PM wrote to me and received them

You mean sturmpanther? Well then its even more hilarious.

Community was presented with clips. Clips with katy was wacthed frame by frame and claimed as one of the most solid maphack prove. Then Kimbo is presenting clip from the stream he, by sheer coincidence, had and kinda debunked it, at least partly.

If replays were made public all this ppl analyzing would have been found same context ages ago.

Again, not saying he is not a cheater. But this situation becoming more and more unsettling really, because of how blantly one sided it is when it comes to analyzation.

Brits have the "no micro needed" options of Bofors and Mortar pits. And the mortar has been made even more cancerous now (for no apparent reason).

Well I do share hatered for brits, but in global picture, objectively things like B4, LeFH, Caliopes, bunker spam are not far behind.

At least mortar pits and bofors are theoretically much more easier to deal with, since at least OKW has easily accesable flame strike or firesturm ind.ammo and ostheer can use mortar HT (even paired with LeFH because there is such commader). So in other words you have more or less accessible options. Even inf can deal with them, if you calculate your push right.

On the other hand howis and mobile arty units (not the ones which can be one-shoted) are in general much-MUCH more toxic in the nature. Because objectively there is no way in the world you will be able to get near them vs more or less decent opponent.