Profile of ferwiner

The game gives you only the settings that windows can see. Check if you have the correct setting in your windows screen settings and if not try to solve that problem first.

Partisans are extremely cost efficient units since the do not pay a premium for m being able to infiltrate.

Partisans are everything but cost effective. They are sometimes worth their initial cost, but they are never worth their reinforcement cost. That is exactly becouse they pay no premium for infiltration. They should pay the premium, but their initial cost should be lower, so that they are cheaper to reinforce.

So why do I think they are not worth their 210 mp when not infiltrating? That is becouse they are the only 4 men close range squad in the game apart from pios who have much more utility. That basically means they cant be used effectively in combat becouse they die too quickly. They also dont have the OP granades or dps of commandos to be really useful in ambush. Nor they can plant demos. They also don't have the vet0 RAcc bonus, other combat 4 men squads get. In effect, the only thing they are really useful for after initiall callin is building mines behind the lines, which you can also do with more cost effective and universal squad of combat engineers.

If you have ever played or seen somebody play partisan commander then they get non-AT partisans very rarely or they sacrifice squads once they have too many of them, just becouse these squads couse way too much bleed in the long run. Merge sadly doesn't work in this case either as conscript models make the unit even weaker than before.

If I was to buff partisans I would change their base cost to 180 (which gives 22,5 reinforcement cost like for example mg42) and I would add either 30 or 60 of infiltration cost, depending on ballance tests and the need of standarisation. I would also think of giving them some small vet 0 RAcc bonus.

If I was to get fancy and add something unique to them, I would let them merge into other squads as well. They would be more expensive than cons, but could actually improve the squad they merge into. That would be also a cheaper way of sacrificing squads if you happen to get too many of them by infiltration.

Thats kinda weird considering its a slow-moving relatively large td

All medium vehicles that have no turret have small target size. This is considered as counterweight to the lack of freedom to swing their gun around. Low profile (which means small target size) was historically one of the main reasons for building such vehicles.

To give you some examples:
su-85 - size 18
jp-4 - size 17 (a winner in the category of hardest to hit medium in game, unless you consider hetzer a proper medium)
stug - size 20

Now some turreted vehicles for comparison:
p4 - size 22
firefly - size 23
jackson - size 24

Mind that this doesnt apply to heavies, as all heavies apart from KV-1 have target size of 26. Which makes sense as neither ISU nor Ele have low profile.

The replay file is basically a list of all commands executed that runs through the game. When you load up the file in a replay it's the ai executing all the same commands with the same rng rolls happening (basically). There's really no other way to play these without the game.

Just would like to add one thing. A game in the version that was used to play the match is needed. One can play it in other version, but as the game is being replayed live, different stats will couse different outcome or a desync. That is why replays from different versions are hidden unless you run the game with some special parameter.

Also, in case OP would wonder about that, the game uses pseudorandom algorithm for the generation of rng rolls, so the file doesnt have to contain results of rng rolls, it simply contains the initial seed.

The soviet sniper squad doesn't survive a mortar shot right now, why would it do that afer you decrease the hp?