Profile of cr4wler

How am I clueless if I have statistics to back it up. Numbers don't lie. UKF consistently ranks last place in 1v1s whether that corresponds with your personal experience or not.

Not sure if this is just cognitive dissonance or a blatant lie. UKF after release had winrates in 1v1 that were only surpassed by USF, team games were similar (4v4 might have been an exception, cant recall).

Also, interesting side note: up until last patch, there were 4 guys in brit 1v1 top 10 with a 90+% winrate... guess how many there were for okw or ostheer? Exactly: 0

Again: either you are trying to lie in our faces with facts clearly on our side, or you "misremember" stuff through your rose-tinted glasses somehow. UKF NEVER was last place in 1v1, that distinction belonged to Ost almost the entire time iirc.

I've played this game twice as much as you. I've played this game since release and played every playlist and faction in arranged or randoms (but mostly arranged cuz surprise surprise some people like to enjoy playing the game strategizing/cooperating with friends). Just because I've taken off from CoH2 doesn't mean shit.

Idk who gave you the permission to point out who deserves to be heard and doesn't.



It's really baffling how you're going to ignore 2v2+. You're blatantly biased, not even attempting to hide it calling team games "scrub." Lol? Do you honestly not care for CoH as a whole and a successful game?

That's some insane tunnel-vision selfish game-killing plan you got there. If you wan't the CoH 2 community to be decimated, then go ahead and say it. You gotta think from the developer/producer's perspective, not a select few "elite." It's a videogame, many people play it, not just you?

There's a ginormous community in CoH, and most of them play 2v2+. That is fact. IF balance was changed based on popular demand, 1v1 would be least looked at, I hate to break it to you. You were there on that Russian tournament yourself and saw how live a poorly marketed non-English tournament went simply because it included large team games, I don't get why this needs any further explanation.

Defensive namecalling... the last straw :-)

Also, after a look at your playercard two things become very obvious: almost exclusively allied player with PROBABLY LESS GAMES THAN DUSTY. How you come to the conclusion that you played this game "twice as much" is beyond me, but it looks like just another non-factual claim (thats fancy speak for lie ;-) ).
In case you actually, truly believed everything you said, you might want to go see a doctor as this is a serious condition.

hmmmm.... i like how the "nose dive" is play rate, and for win rates ofc only 4v4 matches are considered :-D





when in reality, its mostly the play rate for UKF that plummeted, while in turn OKW skyrocketed.

UKF has highest/2nd highest win rate for months? Totally fine.
They dip for a few days after OKW gets buffed? OMG, BUFF ALLIES, NERF AXIS !!!!!!111111oneeleven

it's also funny how it's emphasized that now brits are even worse than OST :-D
maybe if OP played a single game as axis during the last few months (and did a similar thing for ost/okw back then) he could be taken seriously. but, with things they are right now:

95% of the time you won't get more than one AEC, therefore the sidetech cost can be applied, unlike the p4 which does not require sidetech and is often built in quantities of 2 or more.

A zis clone would be bad because it has 2/3 of the pak's fire rate. I'd take a pak vs a zis any day, since the barrage is worth 2 mines or 2/3 of a demo.

I repeat again: the AEC does a job, but it does too little for too much resources. Its intended role is identical to the puma's: light tank hunter, and it does not deliver.

"If the unit is UP then just don't build it" is not the way to balance or play. A given unit should be viable, and right now the AEC is not.

and again... the AEC does it's job by countering the Luchs. you feel like you can deal with the luchs without an AEC? don't get it. your opponent is not OKW? don't get it. your opponent doesn't get the Luchs? don't get it.

the sideteching cost in that case is actually WAY better than anything ost has... you can simply elect to spend the 100/15 for the tech and NEVER EVEN BUILD the AEC. ostheer absolutely cannot just say "ah, well... skipping T2", because if you do you are absolutely screwed vs. pretty much any kind of vehicle (and building T2 is both more complicated, as in you need a pio in your base, and more expensive and it could potentially get killed and you will have to rebuild it to be able to build T2 units again).

i still didn't see a single argument that warrants a buff for the AEC.

Nice set of baseless assumptions here. Check my playercard, I play Ostheer as much as I play Soviet.

I actually fought the Centaur, Chruchill and Tommies when they were OP. I also thought the sniper should lose its AT shot, IF it was replaced by another viable snare. Now the Centaur is useless, the Churchill (especially Croc) is nothing but an overly expensive meatshield, and the Tommies are almost worse than Volks despite costing more and needing fuel/muni investment to compete. The Brits used to be OP, now they have been nerfed to the ground and must hang on for dear life against the overbuffed OKW. Even Ostheer is now better than them in many ways.

You know what else is funny? The Centaur was nerfed precisely because it came too early and was hard to counter. I'll follow your logic, and say Luchs deserves a nerf then.

If all you're interested in is dubious comparisons, I'm not sure any further discussion is of any interest here. The AEC is the only unit from Brits that can counter the Luchs in a timely fashion, and it is either too expensive or not good enough for this role. Play Brits and you might find that out yourself.

i still don't see how the AEC is the only unit capable of countering the luchs and how that means the AEC needs a buff if it actually does its job. also the centaur is far from worthless, just like the churchills. just because the brits are not blatantly OP anymore, like they were for MONTHS, doesn't mean they should get buffed in case OKW is too strong, potentially messing up the Ost/Brit matchup.

and please, in case you REALLY want to be a voice of reason, read all those hilarious threads and posts that this board gets plastered with right now and try getting those guys to be reasonable as well. once you start doing that i might believe you when you say that you actually want a balanced game.

Mandos got nerfed 1 patch ago man, and the glider cost 150mp and commando does not get shreck upgrade and their long range dps is shit so they're pretty much equal.

are you SERIOUSLY trying to justify a cloaked squad that can be deployed anywhere, that even can throw nades and smoke (vet1) as completely comparable to pgrens just because they can get schrecks? ahhh, this forum is better than any comedy :-D