I'm not sure, but to me it seems that the DShK crew dies a lot faster compared to the maxim crew.
I've also had a match where one riflenade destroyed the full health mg thus killing the whole unit. |
I don't know, but I guess they won't implement a spectator mode because of twitch?! |
Have you checked your junk/spam folder? |
Now, this is a fan forum so I guess they would rather have feedback posted on their own site. They have no obligation to post or to be active on this site. I think we all would like them to do it more, but face it, there is no contract that says they have to. Coming with comments like "respond to this relic!" is a good idea, but as we have seen rarely works.
Parts of this community seems to want to drive a wedge in between themselves and relic, which i sad in my eyes. Think about it for a second yourself. If you are called an asshole and a greedy bastard over and over, would you go to that person and ask for advice? Would you feel the need to visit a whole place of ppl who call you names?
Which brings me to my next point. This is a fan forum. I have little or no understanding why alot of users keep posting "I stopped playing this game 3 months ago, it sucks, relic are greedy demons from hell". I do however understand that there are alot of players who are dissapointed of the direction of the game. Some wanted a new coh1, some dont. What makes me wondering is why dissapointed players keep coming back and spreading their hatered here. It is quite obvious if you are posting stuff like that you are not a fan but want the game and relic to crash and burn. I dont like everything relic does. But calling them names is never going to help your/our/any cause.
This is really bad for the community overall. Now I know I cannot make ppl stop posting. And banning them is not an option either, everyone has the right to post. Still, I can really understand if Relic has a grudge against this site and or community. However I dont want them to. I want them to go here and look for ideas, drop a comment here and there in our discussions. However that would require a diffrent tone towards them. Otherwise they just wont look here.
Lastly, the multiplayer community is the smaller portion of their income. But the multiplayer community will also be this games deciding factor in the how long lifespan this game has.
Very well said. +1 |
I never understood why the gave the tellermine to the german faction.... |
Don't worry (I'm in beta).
There are far bigger issues.
I'm starting to get demoralised... |
looks promising |
I'm very undecided on this topic.
The T-70 is extremely cost effective no doubt, but I think a higher fuel price would close it's already short window of opportunity.
Increasing the targetsize however seems to be a reasonable suggestion. |
what the hell are you talking about? a p4 took 4 shots!! to decrew a fucking zis , and a tiger dies like a fly to 3 good positioned zis's , if you make AT guns more deadlier than they are now in combination with the ridiculous at nades range+ instant damaged engine then what is the point of even building tanks ?
And grenadiers die like flies to good positioned snipers.
You want tanks to counter at-guns?!
I don't get your point. |
What about a zis?
If translated, the zis is a pak as well
I meant at-guns in general. |