Let see
churchill- better ultity than kv1
Comet- better utility than Panther
The Churchill comes later, and for more fuel than the KV-1. The Churchill and Comet are also mutually exclusive.
The Comet is a rounded premium medium, the Panther is an AT focuses premium medium. Which is better or worse comes down to what you want them to do.
Uc- better than soviet scout car.
Except units that it's transporting cannot fire from inside of it, which is kind of the main gimmick of the Scout Car.
Vickers mg, better than osther mg32, in my opinion, due to better dps
Unequivocally wrong. An MGs' damage is absolutely secondary to its suppression. Suppression is the primary stat that is important for an MG. Ostheer get the MG42, by the way, not the "32".
Mortar pit, double range of normal mortars, brace, he barrage
And immobile, and therefore impossible to move out of harms' way. It also doesn't have double the range of normal mortars.
Bofor- better than bunkers, brace
Bunkers don't cost fuel, and don't cost population either.
Firefly- better than usf tank destroyer, it can stun and selfspot
The Jackson is much better than the Firefly.
Infantry sections > every other infantry
Correct. IS overtuning is part of why UKF isnt ever going to be a decent faction.
Engineer 2 lmgs or piat + snares. better than other engineers?
There's a reason that nobody gives RoY.Es LMGs (Unless they've gone Hammer, I guess, though this isnt the case anymore either).
USF can give riflemen and REs Zooks and Bars as well, and their mainline infantry has the snare instead of their engineer. I'm not seeing how this is a plus in UKF's favour.
AT emplacement, bettter than ostheer pak40, can brace.
Immobile and costs fuel. Unless you mean the Pak-43, wherein the Pak-43 can shoot through shotblockers on all attacks.
Now come with your dumb reply saying im just a dumb boy or maybe be a grown up and discuss?
You are wrong, and I have given you reasons why.