Profile of Firesparks

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1930

General Information


Thread: firesparks' balance mod31 Aug 2016, 22:45 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2016, 06:21 AMAntemurale Panther: I had almost the same exact idea, but I nerfed its HP to 640 and decreased its cost to 440/155 so that it would be more easy to field. WM T4 is really late, after all. Also, did you adjust the moving accuracy penalty? Volks: Typo? I don't quite understand your change. I see that you have differentiated the Tiger from the Tiger II. Would you like to look into making the IS-2 unique as well? lowering the panther's hp mean that it's going to have less hp than a lot of other tanks, including the e8 and t34-85. I didn't adjust the moving penalty. one second faster reload is pretty drastic change. I want to see how it perform before I change it further. I made changes to the volks' veterancy. turns out giving them healing at vet 1 was too powerful. If you weren't following the vet changes closely you can just look at the main change log. the minor log are for recording "day to day" changes and the is2 is good enough that I don't really want to change it. If I was going to do anything it would probably be something to the is2's alpha damage and reload. Jump back to quoted post31 Aug 2016, 09:25 AMRappy I think this goes in the wrong direction for a lot of things. For example making the 17 pounder too viable AND increasing bofor hp (without removing brace) just means that the map will be more totally locked off for the ukf. I don't like the agility nerf for the Cromwell either. Find a better way to reduce crush. you are going to be need to be more specific with your objection to the 17 pounder changes. I change the 17 pounder's range to 85 meters to match the jagdtiger. Without that changes, the jagdtiger hard counter the 17 pdr. I lowered the 17 pdr's pop to 14 pop because 20 seems excessive. the pak 43 is only 10 pop. The british could probably do without the 17 pounder considering the 6 pdr and firefly. I will admit that I'm sort of treating lock down as an afterthought. There's a lot of stuff I can do with it but rI am not quite sure which one is the best. the cromwell's high agility is directly tied to its crushing ability. Aside from nerfing its acceleration or rotation rate, the only other way to nerf its crush is to remove the crush entirely. In: Modding and Tools
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.29 Aug 2016, 21:16 PM it's probably too cheap first of all. the stuart is only 240 mp 70 fuel compared to the wehr puma's 270 mp 80 fuel. the stuart should be 280 mp 70 fuel. and the stun round should not stop movement. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: stuart and t70 cost vs okw luch and okw puma28 Aug 2016, 22:37 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2016, 21:49 PMCarlos Danger - Make the Stuart's abilities require Veterancy 1 to use. stuart doesn't have smoke like the puma does. just remove the movement stun and make it disable gun only. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: stuart and t70 cost vs okw luch and okw puma27 Aug 2016, 23:04 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2016, 17:47 PMAustralian Magic As for the Stuart, it's useless after sometime while Puma can deal with medium tanks and vetted Luchs is always useful with camo. the stuart stun round will disable main gun regardless of the tank's armor. the Theo vs Devm match also demonstrate that stuart are still useful into the late game. Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2016, 18:07 PMmiragefla Make the T-70 not able to splash more than 2 models. Still lethal, but not death to squads in cover that it gets around and a tad bit more MP. Should still be good AI due to its timing, but not able to knock a squad to 1/2 life of they happened to be bunched. I know Relic recently added that mechanic into modtool, but I think you're a bit too eager make use of it. I also doubt such a change is going to be meaningful. The t70 is powerful against infantry because of its 2 seconds reload and high accuracy. The AOE limit will help unit clump up in cover but the t70 is still going to murder infantry regardless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: stuart and t70 cost vs okw luch and okw puma27 Aug 2016, 14:14 PM the stuart and t70 cost far too little for how they performance. the t70 is probably the best infantry wiper in the game, but it cost only 200 mp 70 fuel compared to the luch's 315 mp 65 fuel. In a direct duel, the t70 will also likely beat the luch as well. The t70's lower hp is easily compensated by the use of its self repair ability, as even one second of self repair will give the t70 an extra "last chance" against stuff like the pak. the stuart is the generalist compared to the Puma and Luch's specialist. Given the stuart's versatility, it should be more expensive. Both the t70 and the stuart should have a price increase to 280 mp 70. Maybe the t70 can get extra for a rof nerf on the gun. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: move stug to tier 2.5?26 Aug 2016, 11:08 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2016, 02:01 AMVindicareX It's principally the same thing - and while not as problematic and t70 or stuart, it still has quite good infantry killing with its Coxial MG. And once again, this lets allies mindlessly get these super light vechs as a anti-everything unit. Anti-everything units (aside from Heavy tanks - late game tech) are pretty anti-fun in this game. I do think the t70 and stuart are a bit overpowered, even if you compared them to the okw. However, I doubt it's possible to keep the light vehicle relevant and not have them overpowered against the wehr. The current wehr just just the bar too low. The Aec's anti-vehicle capability is already limited enough as it is. It lack the stuart's stun capability or the puma's range. The AEC is only effective against light vehicle and even then it's vulnerable to getting swamped by 444. Even then this is not enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: move stug to tier 2.5?25 Aug 2016, 00:48 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2016, 00:29 AMVindicareX Then make their AT capabilities far less - atm, a t70 and a Stuart, and a AEC can duel a Puma quite well, and that's not acceptable to the 1v1 balance. which doesn't solve the problem that the wehr doesn't have any light vehicle to begin with, unless you want to still shoehorn the wehr into using puma and stug e all day. or make 222 even more cost efficient then it is now. The aec is probably the least squad wiping generalist light vehicle in the game. The fact that you view the AEC as a problem show how much difference even having the AEC make. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: move stug to tier 2.5?25 Aug 2016, 00:18 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2016, 23:59 PMVindicareX They can retain their light vech capabilities (even if the stuart stun is some bull pudding), I just don't want them the also be able to nuke down infantry squads with near impunity. which would basically mean turning the stuart and t70 into puma clone. the only purpose of light vehicles would be to fight each other. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: move stug to tier 2.5?24 Aug 2016, 23:25 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2016, 03:27 AMVindicareX Or, nerf units that are clearly over performing rather than messing with units that don't need messing. Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2016, 21:26 PMTheGentlemenTroll Now dare you say such logic logically, how much nerfing do you think the stuart and t70 is going to need in order to accommodate the wehr? do you think they would even be good against the puma, luch, and the stug E afterward? (the stug E cost 200 75 fuel, almost the same as the t70). it would require moving the scale for basically every light armor in the game. even just lacking a light vehicle like the wehr is a huge weakness. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: move stug to tier 2.5?24 Aug 2016, 11:48 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2016, 11:11 AMHighfiveeeee This is it. In addition to the mortar which makes German support troops useless on its own, T70 is way to strong. Almost every shot is a model kill, its extremely fast and can survive 3 pak shots with self repair. If the enemy is not totally stupid and gets fausted or drives over a tellermine, there is nothing Germans can do to get that thing while it keeps harrassing everywhere. Germans in theory have great counters with the Raketenwerfer and especially the PaK40. But they miss so many shots and their aim time is way too slow. PaKs imo need a buff, lower their aim time, a little bit for all Paks and a huge bit more for the Raketenwerfer. a faction without access to any light armor is going to be at a disadvantage against those who do, unless their atw is really really "practical". ironically the USF is the faction best equipped at facing light vehicle with only infantry and support weapons. Bazooka, 57mm and the rifle at nade are all technically inferior to the wehr counter part, but is yet more practical in general. (having a 5 men squad helps as well) and interesting that you think pak need a lower aim time. Their current aim time is .125 seconds, and it's unaffected by distance. In: COH2 Balance