Profile of Support Sapper

Comet

Fuel cost reduced from 185 to 175Hull MG accuracy increased to 0.7/0.55/0.35/from 0.6/0.45/0.25/Hull MG burst duration increased to 1.5/1 from 1/0.75 secondsHull MG damage increased from 4 to 5


Got a big buff.
So how is it? Allies OP

The buff it deserve, now the commet really stat to function vs infantry. It still cant 1v1 panther so be done with it.

3 pz gren can delete a cromwell in just 1 slavo (120×6). 2 rangers triple zook cant do the same with a P4 (100×6).

I think the artillery needs a buff. Not only is it absolutely out shine by the medical kit, the latter being a necessity if you want to heal, but I find it often fails to even kill an Ostheer Bunker. You're better off bringing up your 6 Pounder or AEC.

Make the last round no scatter may be ? Like TOT of infantry company.

1. So just because there are other units it justifies specific ones being trash? Okay.
2. I said Brits are static, hence why their off base reinforcement is static.
3. Well if you don’t use indirect fire don’t complain why you don’t get the benefits.
4. Yes we already know that, just as 7men is mandatory for cons yet you can’t buy it in T0.
5. 30 mp means nothing. Not having pgrens is true, but you get double brens to compensate, as well as doctrinal options. Like I said, Brits have no right to get better infantry than anyone, this is just childish behaviour from Brits players who are used to strutting around with their batshit broken sections pretending they have any skill. Well according to Sturmpanther they aren’t getting adjusted.
7. I misunderstood that one, but since sections build sandbags why do you pretend like sappers building sandbags would be better? I’d argue starting with a section and then having them make cover is superior.
11. You get the Vickers upgrade for long range dps on axis 4man squads and the flamethrower upgrade to clear garrisons. Looks really good to me.

1. I didn't say con is trash, you said so, i mention penal as an example that a faction have more infantry choice, ukf only have tommy and tommy.
2. You say forward base is UKF's "mobile" reinforce, and that is wrong. Ost is designed to be more static and defense Orient, too, but why they still have pzgren and fast LV and mobile reinforce HT ?
3. Have you ever use th mortar pit yourself ? And i can say exactly the same about the case of gren, you dont use your support weapons to support gren, you dont get the result you want.
4. And UKF and sow have completely different line up, sow can chose to begin with better infantry, UKF can chose to invest early to make their infantry better. If you want mirroring then make move bolster to T2, then make them free at T3 or specializations, will you?
5. If 30 Mp mean nothing then why volk outperform con that much ? And if having double bren is to compensate for not having unit like panzer gren then why you complaint when it is better than single mg42 ? And dont bring in doctrinal because axis have their doc too. Furthermore If You say ukf have no right to have better infantry then who give okw and ost the right to have stock elites ??? Sory but You dont event try to hide you bias there.

7. I dont pretend anything, some guy bring up that tommy should lose sandbags, i simply dont agree with that because UKF doesn't have T0 engineer to built cover for tommy, that is all.

11. Sounds great until you actually have to use it.

Honest questions, do you play UKF ?

1. Cons suck but have to wait until T4 for bolster or pay in T3. Tommies have it much better.
2. Their medic bunker gives them mobile reinforce. They’re designed to be a more static faction.
3. Mg in building? Drop smoke, drop flare, building deleted. Smoke exists, use it.
4. That’s because everyone bolsters as soon as possible.
5. They don’t need to be better than an mg42. Grens are 4 men with an mg42, tommies are 5 men with a bren. 2 brens are absolute overkill and why the hell do tommies need to be better than grens in the first place?
6. This has been discussed to death. Giving sappers snares has revitalized the faction.
7. Most of the early game is spent capping. By the time you start dealing with coordinated assaults you should have sappers.
8. Absolutely nothing wrong with a standard grenade.
9. This has been the case for a while but the balance team refuses to remove the cover rof mechanic.
11. The UC’s competition in terms of T0 vehicles is the Kubel, the 221 and the Jeep. By far the most durable and has the best upgrades. Don’t you dare say it was better before the armour nerf, it was absolute cancer to deal with when facing ukf.

1. Penal exist doesn't they ?
2. Since when that the forward assembly can move ???
3. What smoke ? You mean the mortar pit ? It is at the bottom limit of usable now and absolutely not fit competitive lv of gameplay.
4. Which can prove that it is a mandatory upgrade and UKF is force to buy it or get fucked.
5. Why tommy have to be better than gren ? Very nice question. May be it have something to do with the fact that tommy is more expensive, requires more investment and being the only infantry unit the faction has nondoc.
6. Which further prove that giving PIAT to tommy is retarded.
7. If saper can be use as an assault unit then why panzer gren and have to exist with 4 stg and nuke nade since ost already stat with pio and pio and sapper have identical DPS profile ???
8. The fist guy bring it up in a list to prove that tommy is not underperform, i say it is standard, not outstanding and i'm ok with that.
9. It is a part of the faction identity which have been scaled down by a lot since the release.
11. And it have to fill the gap that the faction lack basis tools for, doesn't it ?