Profile of Support Sapper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: How's the post-patch Comet?4 Oct 2019, 01:41 AM Churchill +firefly = 310 fuel. 2 Comet = 370 fuel. Churchill & firefly combo cost lest than 2 comet and do everything better, simple as that. The bonus of hammer is not as attractive as anvil on top of that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?3 Oct 2019, 04:40 AM Re then can use vet to gains grease gun profile for their sten, or upgrade to 2 Thompson. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?3 Oct 2019, 04:32 AM To improve UKF early game, i suggest swapping royal engineer and Universal carrier. RE in T1 provide early capping power and close range defense. Add a fuels cost of 10-15 to UC and put it in T2, allow troops to fight from inside of the vehicle and add an armour upgrade, cost fuel, to bring it up to M20 lv, add a smoke pot to it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?2 Oct 2019, 17:36 PM Sections with full upgrade and vet canbe somewhat fine late game but out of the box, they suck. The fact is the whole early - early mid game of UKF is suck and it prevent you from getting to the late game, where things are a bit better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Easy USF fix30 Sep 2019, 12:27 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2019, 12:09 PMblvckdream Why would changing the starting resources slightly and making officers 80MP more expensive turn USF from OP to 37% win-rate? Are you out of your mind? The penetration changes from Jackson would only really impact Tigers and KTs. The only way someone can think USF is balanced in this patch is if they are exclusively playing 3v3 and 4v4 everyone semi-decent in 1v1 and 2v2 knows balance is stupid at the moment. (UKF borderline useless now too, so not just USF issue) With that change, if you go 2 rifle then the gap is too big for the 3rd infantry squad, if you go 3 rifle then you will have too many infantry later on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British rework?30 Sep 2019, 03:05 AM While the whole ideal of you may be too difficult to apply, we can take some elements of it, such as the valentine to replace bofor. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British rework?29 Sep 2019, 18:32 PM You have a bunch of nice ideas there. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll: How are grens after the rifle buff?28 Sep 2019, 01:23 AM Keep the distance more than 10 range from rifle and gren will be perfectly fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?27 Sep 2019, 11:48 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Sep 2019, 11:33 AMVipper I personally I am not a big fun of 6 men squads lets leave that for soviet as stock... My personal opinion is that UKF is one of the worst design factions. A decent solution I see would be to take advantage of the hammer anvil design and offer to paths of UKF for each stage of the game. Either defensive units closer to Ostheer design (4 men squads with LMGs) or offensive units close to USF design (5 men squads with BAR type of weapons). Similar with tanks. In addition to more option on how much one can invest in emplacements both in tech and cost. Finally UKF stock units that semi elite infatry could get some sort of upgrade with hammer/anvil. For instance the 4 men squads an officer with Pistol/Smg that increased the durability of the unit without increasing the Far DPS or some sort of timed ability for 5 men squad increasing RA or DPS for 5 men squads. So, following your feedback. Infantry sections will still stat with 4 man, i'm ok with that. Now if we let them stat with 1 weapon slot, then anvil will add the 2nd slot and give them survivability upgrade like armour/RA to become ober equivalent, and, hammer add 5th man and change their only bren to elite bren profile - aka fire on the move, the 5th model will use a sten or Thompson. What's about that ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?27 Sep 2019, 11:24 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Sep 2019, 09:48 AMVipper Maybe one could offer some sort of upgrade with the anvil/hammer tech similar to 7th man for conscripts. Allow me to add some of my thinking on your ideas. Let say, make infantry sections 5 man from the stat but with only 1 weapon slot, then hammer add the 6th man and anvil add the 2nd weapon slot. Upgrade will be paid for each squad separately once hammer/anvil has been researched. Bolster upgrade and cover gimmick can be completely remove then. In: COH2 Balance