Profile of Balanced_Gamer

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 783

General Information


Thread: Super AT Guns26 Jun 2019, 15:46 PM I think all emplacements should be de-crewable. I mean, the British AT Emplacement gets never decrewed but the Pak43 can. Zero logic! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations26 Jun 2019, 15:38 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 15:38 PMdistrofio +1 to reduce 10 Fuel from centaurs as @Balanced_gamer said. He's right you know. Appreciated In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations26 Jun 2019, 15:34 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 15:29 PMLago The Centaur is way more powerful against infantry than the Cromwell. I mean, yeah. So, what does it matter when Cromwell is also good against infantry but to a lesser extent. Mainly it has the capability to take on Tanks which Centaur cant even do. I would rather go for something that is overall more self-sufficient, better for its price. Now, there is really no incentive in using Centaur because of its current price as I just stated. It would make more sense if it were 20 fuel more difference. Since it has 1 capability only which is infantry. Makes more sense for vehicles that are specialists to be cheaper than generalists. For just 10 fuel difference, I take Cromwell anytime. Cromwell is very good against infantry. Very consistent. Somehow better than Comet against infantry which is odd! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations26 Jun 2019, 15:27 PM The price of Ostwind should stay. Centaur price should be reduced to 90 fuel. It is ridiculous to set a price higher than a T34, USF Wolverine, UKF Achilles. All ranging from 80-90 fuel. Why on earth increase price, it is just irrational! Making both Ostwind and Centaur a 100 fuel is a very stupid idea! _____ When playing UKF, I try to consider using Centaur but I really do not any reason in using it because the Cromwell which costs 110 fuel. It only costs just 10 fuel more than a Centaur. It has more capabilities and it is definitely better for its price. Why the hell a 100 fuel for Ostwind and Centuar. Are you really kidding me!!! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Riflemen kinda fix.26 Jun 2019, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 14:10 PMGI John 412 The only thing that I would change about stock Riflemen would be a very minor cost reduction from 280 purchase price and 28 reinforce price, to 270 and 27. The most minor of cost reduction. As to how do you reduce OKW early dominance? I think Elchino hit the nail on the head. It’s all about the speed at which they can field Volksgrenadiers, while being already backed up by Sturm Pioneers. So you either need to hurt the speed at which VolksGrenadiers can be fielded by adjusting either their starting resources or the cost of Volks squads themselves, or you nerf the effectiveness of Sturm Pioneers. Perhaps give the starting Sturm Pioneers MP40s instead of StG44s. They then automatically upgrade to have StG44s for free once the first truck is build, and any Sturm Pioneer squads you build from HQ are unchanged and still get StG44s right away. I think the idea with Sturmpio starting with MP40 may be a good start. To reduce their impact on early gameplay. Later after 1 base built, get the option to acquire Stg44. Since their impact on early gains wont be as much when they begin with MP40. Sounds good. I do not see why Volks should be more expensive, considering that their performance with Grens are on par. Reducing the cost of manpower in the beginning might render OKW vulnerable as they do not have AT to counter vehicles. I mean there is Rak but its a pretty crap support AT weapon. So, Sturmpio starting with MP40 is a good idea . In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Replace Relief Infantry by Ostruppen？25 Jun 2019, 22:18 PM That would be nice. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Riflemen kinda fix.25 Jun 2019, 22:14 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2019, 22:08 PMVipper Rifelemn where fine for a very long time and where even op at one point. It the other infatry that have been buffed and too much imo. Which units are buffed too much, if you do not mind me asking? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Riflemen kinda fix.25 Jun 2019, 22:13 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2019, 22:06 PMShadowLinkX37 Problem lies in OKW, not in USF IMO. Because USF does very much alright against OST, but lacks the early power of volks + sturms. Yes, USF does have a hard time early against OKW. I mean this idea of reducing cost can help them in some way combat this difficulty. Maybe a buff for Rear Echelon to make it more of a reliant combat unit. Price should be 220 manpower instead and it should receive an accuracy buff accordingly. Becomes also a more viable option instead of Riflemen mostly. So say if you are against OKW, you can pick more Echelons instead to deal with the situation. Just an idea! To change the adaption of the situation. It may be a good idea! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Replace Relief Infantry by Ostruppen？25 Jun 2019, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2019, 22:03 PMWiderstreit Still, these Osttruppen arn't able to build sandbags or wire. Even they are good for team-weapons. Also they only have one weapon-slot. You are right. I can not think of another unit that has 1 ability only. Maybe sandbags, or barbed wire would be a nice addition! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Riflemen kinda fix.25 Jun 2019, 21:58 PM Everyone knows that Riflemen in the beginning have sometimes a tough time against Axis due to its price and early effectiveness. So, I was thinking that maybe make Riflemen cost around 260 manpower or 270 instead. BUT at the cost of nade and weaponry tech upgrades costing more, accordingly. *The point is to.* 1./ Put them on the field faster in order to maintain better control 2./ In order to sustain probably lesser losses due to the fact that you are being outnumbered/outgunned 3./ Reduce the loss of early manpower Do not know if it is going to shift the balance of the game but I would like to hear as to what you guys have to say about this! In: COH2 Gameplay