Profile of Balanced_Gamer

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 783

General Information


Thread: Do Allies retreating units get smaller target size?29 Jun 2019, 09:45 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2019, 16:54 PMRollingStone So, a retreating squad of obers walks into a BAR... You do know, how BAR damage dispertion works? If don't, then it looks like this - If it hits, some of damage is transfered to other models. Obers are rare. They are not really a thing or of little to no significance in this game. Due to its terrible timing, makes it almost pointless getting them due to the fact that they are ill-suited. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: mouse and keyboard stops29 Jun 2019, 09:41 AM What kind of computer does the guy have? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Is raketen ever going to get better?29 Jun 2019, 09:37 AM The thing is, it has the so called best attributes being: 1./ Camo 2./ Retreat 3./ Slightly more mobile (None of them really being for pure AT purposes, more for RECON suitability) But the thing that makes this the worst AT gun is due to these factors: 1./ Highest received accuracy 2./ Limited Range (forcing it to get closer) 3./ 4 man clumped 4./ Slower Targeting due to limited range (meaning its "time to aim" is limited) All these combo into a very unreliable AT gun, in terms of AT support and it's overall survivability. Having to get close, means getting closer to death, if you understand what I am trying to say. "Limited Range" meaning limiting its capabilities to serve as an AT gun! Either make RAKS range better or reload way faster (cuz USF AT gun has the fastest reload of all AT on top of having the best range in game). Raketenwerfer needs to do better to fulfill its designated role! It can not scale well, its not good against vehicles because of its range. If you compare USF AT gun for similar price. It decimates lights because its targeting, reloading, range is all faster and better than the Rak. Even its abilities are more effective. I think nerfing Raks camo (its recon role) to suit better an AT role would be great, balanced. If I had to compare to the Zis-gun, it is way better. It has the range, survivability, its effectivness and impact on the field is far greater. It can even provide infantry support which makes it all the more better. Clearly, the only true purpose Rak serves is as a Recon and an Assassin role. Not as an support AT role! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wishlist for 201928 Jun 2019, 15:00 PM Create a new commander for USF. A new elite unit, an ace, a super soldier. It is called In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bug Report for Commander patch28 Jun 2019, 14:47 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2019, 22:33 PMSander93 That's the way the weapon works. High burst damage and long cooldowns. Thanks for information. I just think the cooldown duration can be too long sometimes. Maybe reduce its long cooldown since it already requires you to stop in order to make use of it.* Buff to all LMG users except SU Guard Rifles upgrade (since they are very strong already).* I have done tests several times with Grens MG42 and came to realise that waiting a long 2-3 seconds before it shoots, it can completely miss sometimes and for what? I just feel sometimes the upgrade can be, not worth it in most situations due to how it functions. Works great vet 3 but anything below that is simply not worth using because of its inconsistency. That is why Volks are preferred more because their STG package is consistent! Just asking for it especially for UKF bren MG to more consistent! I mean the G43 upgrade is very consistent. It is far more reliable for its performance and consistency! I pick that over anytime over the MG, because it is far more consistent! Just fix or buff the consistency of LMG. I mean the guy is on the floor, it should not be difficult as it already has to be and it should have every opportunity to shoot. No long cooldowns. Why wait that long when you already have to force it to be stationary already? Just saying! In: Lobby
Thread: Is raketen ever going to get better?28 Jun 2019, 14:30 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2019, 14:10 PMMusti Yeah, OKW really lacks in the AT departament, this should give them a bit more of a chance against allied LVs. +1. Very true indeed. They really do lack in the AT department. Rak needs changes as it fulfills more the role as recon than it does an AT support unit. It fails on many occasions to be the AT unit it needs to be! It simply can not be relied upon currently. I know it is used, it is simply frustrating but all in all, it is completely unreliable when it comes down in need of AT support in contrast to other available AT in game. What it needs is complete nerf on camo (nerf on recon department) and improvement on their AT. Make range as any other and make it 5 man. Why, because it already has the highest received accuracy. The reason as to why it has bad/terrible target acquisition is because it does not the time to acquire due to its limited range. Range definitely needs improvement in order to do better. List of changes I think it should get: - Rak should be more expensive, come later, made better for AT purposes. - Camo should nerfed to the point where it can not move. Have to setup before camo, can only rotate. Can only start moving vet 1, but like grandpa speed! - Crew should be 5 man since its current vulnerability is batshit insane. Highest received accuracy plus having to be closer range is a pure death sentence. - Range should be the same as any other AT gun in order to fulfill its purposes. Better range for better target aquistion which is really suffers due to that fact! - Does not come T0 anymore! - Price increased to 300 manpower. If the 5 man is too much. Main priority is range fix, because range it the huge factor in determining its supportive role in game. It's current range is the main reason as to why it experience many difficulties such as target aquisition, received accuracy including its survivability. Making its range better would almost, fix its issues. To make it survive better also. It should be from a recon role to more a AT role. OKW already have a huge, if not, not more than enough recon in their department. They lack AT and that needs changing. It will less frustrating overall, and help better for them to scale, and have at least something accessible that is supportive for once in their AT department. Overall, Nerf their recon department and buff their AT department. Also made a forum relating to this issue, their lacking AT department. here is the link: https://www.coh2.org/topic/91739/to-justify-okw-no-caches-no-bases-refund I explain why they lack AT and how it affects them overall. You can see for yourself if you are interested! I hope Rak gets some fixes and adjustments. Better AT role! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: TO JUSTIFY OKW NO CACHES, NO BASES REFUND! 28 Jun 2019, 09:30 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 18:54 PMthedarkarmadillo I think a lot of the problem with people saying the rak is spammable is combined with volks low price and trade effeciently. It's absolutely worth it as an okw player to have multiple raks camod between your blob and retreat path for anyone daring to chase you. It's cheap AND volks are cheap, meaning they are not difficult to get (it also helps that they come from t0 so 270 is the price you see and 270 is the price you pay) Funny enough the most manpower abundant faction is the one that represents late war germany I know, I do not it is good way of defining OKW role. Raks were hardly used in comparison to Pak40, so there accessibility to it was less. How is it cheaper if it was harldy made in comparison! - Rak should be more expensive, come later, made better for AT purposes. - Camo should nerfed to the point where it can not move. Have to setup before camo, can only rotate. Can only start moving vet 1, but like grandpa speed! - Crew should be 5 man since its current vulnerability is batshit insane. Highest received accuracy plus having to be closer range is a pure death sentence. - Range should be the same as any other AT gun in order to fulfill its purposes. - Does not come T0 anymore! - Price increased to 300 manpower. It should be from a recon role to more a AT role. It will less frustrating overall, and help better for them to scale, and have at least something accessible that is supportive for once in the AT department. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wishlist for 201928 Jun 2019, 09:19 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2019, 23:20 PMVipper Building do not offer stronger cover, they simply are not affected by the point blank mechanism, thus they provide cover even in fire fight that take place closer to 10 units. They should have that mechanism for ignoring cover the close you are. I mean how ridiclous does it sound for a squad that closes in face to face with smg's but the guy with bolt actions holds them off because he is a building! It should be at least closer than 5 units. Still the building gives an advantage, but as much as it should currently now. Another alternative to at least counter in another way. I mean it is quite self-evident in terms of urban combat, who should win that engagement irl. Not bolt actions close range but it should be smgs who win the initiative mainly when they close in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bug Report for Commander patch27 Jun 2019, 22:11 PM Grens with MG42 (weapon upgrade). Kind of buggy sometimes when it does not shoot the MG42 for period of 2-3 seconds. It is not even reloading, why does it take long? It just takes that long sometimes. It needs to be more consistent! In: Lobby
Thread: TO JUSTIFY OKW NO CACHES, NO BASES REFUND! 27 Jun 2019, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2019, 21:59 PMthedarkarmadillo The commander does though. I assume that's what they mean. ahhh, I see. In: COH2 Balance