Profile of Mazianni

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 785

General Information


Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 16:27 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 16:10 PMdistrofio Riflemen M1s are more effective at those ranges than volks kar98... Bar as a weapon upgrade, it improves DPS at all ranges rather changing the whole squad profile Both of these things are by design. Hence the lack of USF Obers or Pgrens. Am I to take it you have also joined the "Nerf BAR!" crowd or is this just a random factnote. My purpose of bringing up the stats was to compare the relative lethality of the BAR upgrade, not to ask for a nerf to any unit. Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 15:18 PMVipper G43 moving accuracy is too high but this is different subject and F42 is an "elite" weapon but imo it need to get a non linear curve and imo it should be limited to 1-2. Point here is that BARs makes great at all Riflemen at all ranges and on the move. What I am suggesting is making the weapon good at MID range so that riflemen do not bully LMG grenadiers at far nor will get get bullied by PGs at mid, for a lower cost. With respect, this is pathetic reasoning. A single BAR is not going to overtake the DPS of a LMG gren squad in its proper range, and once you see double BARs it damned well better should overpower a 60mun 240MP investment. We've already nerfed USF IDF units and granted Grens a unique damage reduction bonus at vet 3, the rank by which you should be seeing double BARs anyway, if at all. This unit simply does not require any more babying. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 14:03 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:59 PMStug life no bar does increase long range dps tho u even posted it, not lmg lvl tho, gren g43 unlike bar don't increase long range dps it's either the same or lower (on pgreen is another story) If you refer to the strange little uptick in DPS measured at the 35 range mark, I don't really think it's statistically relevant. BAR DPS as a rule is lower the further out you go, and I don't know how to explain the sudden uptick by looking at the stats. If I had to guess it has something weird to do with the burst duration. Do you mean increase long range DPS compared to the base rifle? That is true, it does, but for the tech and 60 munitions I should think it would, and his issue with it was apparently with regards to movement accuracy, and that is an instance where any of the G43s are king. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:52 PMStug life ??? g43 have no dps increase at long range tho like a bar do I have no idea what you're trying to say. BAR DPS doesn't increase into long range like a MG42 or a M1919. It's a downwards scale. You're right that G43 DPS doesn't increase at long range either, but it also doesn't decrease with movement accuracy, which was his point. Are you sure you aren't confusing the BAR with the M1919 LMG? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:50 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:41 PMVipper Yes it is. Its long DPS is too high for a weapon that can be fired on the move. I'll take that in good faith and assume you feel the same about FG-42s and G43s. In any case, why not just edit the moving stats? Like the absurd 0.1 cooldown modifier on the move could be made 0.5. Movement accuracy to 0.6. Etc. Most people aren't constantly moving their infantry around. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:17 PMVipper It like saying an smg is as good as carbine. The weapon simply have different profiles and the comparison is misleading. Do you consider the BAR overpowered or not? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:10 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 13:06 PMVipper The Bar is better at long range where ST44 completely drops off , while the ST44 is around x117% at range 0. Its about x374% times better max range. The STG is also 42% better at range 15. The comparison was and remains valid for the point being made. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 13:00 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 12:57 PMVipper Check your number they are completely off. Pg's St44 and BAR have completely different curves. Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2019, 12:58 PMStug life 1 bar > 2 volks stg I mentioned PzGrens, not Volks. The point of all this was to say the BARs really don't need work. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 12:31 PM BAR is basically comparable to a single PzGren Stg44, but locked behind tech and costing 60muni a piece. I don't know why anyone would ask for a nerf to them or RM's ability to carry BARs. I don't know why anyone thinks REs need work either. They're shit early game but scale better than any of the eastern front engineer units at least. If I had to buff them I'd make the 5 man bonus come at vet 2 instead of 3, but that's it. They're really fine as is. Why not talk about units that actually need to be worked on, like the Pack Howie or the M2HB with it's still not fixed 0.5 retreat RA. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changes to Wehrmacht's Storm commander6 Sep 2019, 01:05 AM Allowing pios to lay riegels would be too good lol. 60 Munition light vehicle deletion and tank immobilization is the kind of thing that has to be locked behind a vehicle of its own IMO. Like if M20 M6 mines were deployable by REs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Sherman 76 mm - Who needs it?4 Sep 2019, 20:28 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2019, 20:20 PMVipper Reload time for for HVAP is 6.1 vs 6-6.6 average 6.3 the difference is minimal. One has to switch munition the other does not... One round has better stats (accuracy, penetration, ROF), one round does not... Do you believe the fact that an Easy 8 does not have to switch rounds makes it more effective versus armor than the 76mm? Versus something like a Panther? I ask because the 76mm Sherman would outdps the Easy Eight versus a Panzer IV as a given, a scenario where the Easy Eight would have to rely on it's superior durability, primarily it's 55 extra armor, a stat which is not nearly as useful versus anything heavier than one. Re the edit concerning the PzIV J; This vehicle has better armor and better AI than either tank. In: COH2 Balance