Profile of SuperHansFan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 833

General Information


Thread: The end of Battlefield & Dice era29 Apr 2020, 05:27 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2020, 22:20 PMTheGentlemenTroll Current BF player who is apart of the Twitch Community and the dead competitive community (Top 1% in KD, KPM, SPM, etc). Issues with the game is mostly severe bugs that have been in the game since launch, a lack of rsps mixed with a severe cheating issue, and game mechanics/gameplay solely designed to limit good players. There is also a huge lack of content. I have a friend whos a bf streamer that is probably one of the best bf/fps players I've seen recently, hes been stream sniped by a aimbotting cheater for an entire year without that cheater being banned. The anti-cheat is non existent. I can go in detail with how Dice managed to fuck up literally every major update since launch but I might be typing all day trying to explain the sheer incompetence at Dice Sweden. By game mechanics designed to limit good players do you mean TTK changes? Just curious because I felt previous BF TTKs weren't bad Maybe they wanted a scapegoat for why players are leaving In: Other Games
Thread: Pioneers after early game28 Apr 2020, 19:57 PM Give the option to put away minesweeper for all sweeper units In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 19:44 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 12:00 PMMr Carmine Lol yeah he is knocking down the pedistal he made and climbed on with his own hypocracy. Expeted, deserved and quite funny to be honest. On topic: bolster comes way to early. As 4 men tommies should have only 1 weapon slot. As 5 men 2. And bolster a final tech side tech as some one suggested earlier. not t0 minute 1 as its now basicly. And as the only allied faction with four man squads what options do brits have vs Wehr sniper and ost doctrinal inf? No doubt bolster is effective, but its pretty much mandatory vs Wehr sniper play to prevent early retreats. We saw how strong 5man gren into sniper was last tournament as Tommy spam was punished. Now imagine how quick those games would have finished in Ost wins with four man squads. It's all good saying brits can rely on weapon upgrades that can up their DPS instead, but vs sniper play you need staying power in engagements and Brens can't help you there. Any rework with bolster with changing Tommy power level needs to have them at five man for this reason. We already had a year of Ostheer sniper dominance vs Brits when bolster was more expensive and fielded later. But it was changed to come earlier to give a chance vs sniper cheese. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry vehicle snare comparison28 Apr 2020, 14:59 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2020, 19:05 PMApplejack Why do Axis have better snares when they also have the heavier tanks. Boggles my mind. Is it because USF have better infantry? It was even more of a mess before Pfuss and AT tommies used to have extra AT grenade range compared to regular AT nade range. Also riflemen used to get extra AT grenade range through vet. Right now gren faust is the best, and gets better once you equip extra range bullitin for maximum lols (you can basically counter wasp with just faust) In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 11:53 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2020, 11:40 AMDAZ187 come again aerohank ? so i must wait till i can upgrade my ass grens so they can compete with a unit that comes from the get go. i have tried sprinting into them but the grens lost every time I'm sure if you post a replay of your assgren usage him and others would be happy to provide advice. Assgrens got a lot of use in the tournament. So watching pro replays is a good way to learn how to pick your engagements. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are sections perfectly fine?28 Apr 2020, 09:58 AM I feel four man tommies are slightly UP, but your poll doesn't really diffentiate. if IS were to get changes I would like to see a buff for four men or possibly brens at mid range. Then change bolster so you need to pay extra for replacemet squads (around 300mp). 5man tommies need to be good to live up to that 8pop price tag when rifles are 7. (less of an issue earlygame but more of a lategame problem combined with FF and churchhill population). So I think their performance is fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why on earth do sections need 50% moving acc? Seriously.28 Apr 2020, 07:42 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2020, 22:42 PMDAZ187 This is true they shit on every axis close unit. there is no counter to them early game. only Pgrens have a chance against them. Do you think Assault grens or Assault engineers are OP too? Because Assault sections had their stats pretty much mirrored with those two units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command Panther dead?28 Apr 2020, 05:40 AM Command panther is not the victim of any major nerfs It's the victim of the command tiger that just performs better In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Adjustments for the Brits27 Apr 2020, 16:24 PM You say you want to increase indirect fire options but your suggestions include nerfing Valentine link with sexton which it needs to perform in team games due to limited range until vet. Then adding a Pak howi at 5 command points doctrinally? IMO this will nerf British indirect in teamgames more than anything. Also I'm fairly certain the Brits never operated Pak howitzers anyway. Also it will spawn more axis tears as we know how Pak howi threads go. Also adding a Valentine non doctrinally would be a complete pain to balance because it's effectively giving Brits a unit in the T70 role and give them the biggest power spike in the game next to soviets. Even old AI AEC wouldn't match up to Valentine performance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Changes i feel grens need27 Apr 2020, 06:08 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2020, 00:10 AMIncendiaryRounds The reason why grens have struggled over the last 2 patches is due to the uncalled for rifle buffs and the OP 7man upgrade. Now cons, in theory, should be balanced, but now still struggle vs rifles and now the new terminator sections. Grens themselves are fine. One look at patch notes would prove you wrong Old guards, old Tommies (that had 0.75 RA) and old penals all had much much better stats than they do now. 7man cons are ok but not as good as old wall of DP guards that gave obers a run for their money and shut down LV play. But apparently now pgrens being stronger with earlier vet and timing, better grens with doctrines and T4 buffs mean the balance team is bias and allied inf are terminators now? Do you understand how stats work? 0.85 is worse than 0.75 In: COH2 Balance