Profile of CODGUY

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 888

General Information
Steam: 76561198148873125


Thread: UKF September patch discussion10 Sep 2019, 02:09 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 20:12 PMVipper Since the FF is receiving 2 buffs, how about locking tulips behind anvil/hammer and allowing some breathing room to mediums? Can't do that. The Firefly only looks cool once you upgrade it with Tulip rockets. It just looks so dumb without them. When I get a Firefly the first thing I do is immediately purchase the Tulip rocket upgrade. Doesn't matter if I won't even use them (which I almost never do). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF September patch discussion7 Sep 2019, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 17:41 PMdistrofio The bias is not within the balance but on who is judging what is right or wrong. 'Heavy Panzer HQ' flak gun doesnt require any adjustments thats why its untouched. Yeah the whole faction was sold independently, it must have been so EZ to use when it got released, but now that doesnt matter anymore, it is now balanced as the original game and the western factions. Apart from being very disrespectful to developers, can you elaborate something productive? Oh I know why they aren't changing the Heavy Panzer HQ, it's because its all part of the great mystique of the powerful and advanced German war machine that some people just love. That's also why they got their nondoctrinal Obersoldaten, King Tiger, starting shock infantry/engineer unit. I'm not gonna lie it's cool but I think it's pretty lame Brits continually and endlessly get nerfs every patch. The Bofors was not a problem, it was just annoying for OKW and Ostheer players because they had to actually invest in indirect fire units or they had to actually be creative but I guess we can't have that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF September patch discussion7 Sep 2019, 16:48 PM If the Bofors nerf isn't proof that balance is skewed towards friggen Wehraboo noobs I don't know what is. Did they nerf the Heavy Panzer HQ flak gun? NOPE! Yes it was good at killing Axis blobs...and that's a probalem why? It's not like it was mobile, immune to indirect fire, or not limited by a side tech. I rarely even built the thing honestly...I guess rarely now means never going forward. Can we replace it in the tech tree with something else maybe? I swear to God this community gets off on nerfing Brits every chance it gets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 20:18 PM Why is the Bofors a problem again? I must have forgot...are we removing Ostheer's mortar and OKW's LEIG? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track6 Sep 2019, 20:12 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 09:28 AMullumulu Then explain bofors. It comes MUCH earlier, is MUCH more powerful to lock down areas and is even MUCH cheaper. How's it's mobility? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Sherman 76 mm - Who needs it?6 Sep 2019, 16:49 PM The E8 consistently trounces both Panzer IV H and J models, without unusually bad RNG for the USF player. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 16:46 PM So now we're nerfing BARs? LOL. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion6 Sep 2019, 00:42 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2019, 09:53 AMStug life u could check stats for once like look at pioneers or CE Pioneers are obviously better and Combat Engineers are priced correctly. What's your point? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion5 Sep 2019, 05:55 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2019, 20:03 PMKatitof Not sure its such a great idea, its pretty great in terms of performance, but then again, all the counters are already present at 4CP. I've never understood the point of the Greyhound. Friggen 60 fuel and it sucks against a Luchs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion5 Sep 2019, 05:27 AM USF already sucks I don't understand the desire to nerf more of their stuff...are OKW players looking for an auto-win button for their faction? Here is my question for USF: Why the hell is the worst engineer unit in the game AND worst starting unit in the game a 200 MP unit? Ostruppen are like 180 MP for a 6 man T0 combat unit, Royal Engineers are 210 for a 5 man unit, Grenadiers are only 40 MP more and are like 10x better. Can we maybe adjust the price to reflect it's crap preformance just a little bit since nobody wants to make it worth its 200 MP cost by maybe adding a 5th man? Maybe we can look at USF infantry as a whole. Why are Pathfinders 290 MP when their preformance doesn't match their price? Why are Combat Engineers 280 MP when their preformance doesn't match their price? Why is there some innate desire to make sure USF's infantry are consistently overpriced and underperforming? I am glad about the Riflemen buff but like I said I'll have to wait and see how that plays out. In: COH2 Balance