Profile of CODGUY

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 888

General Information
Steam: 76561198148873125


Thread: Soviet September patch discussion18 Aug 2019, 04:50 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Aug 2019, 16:43 PMKirrik Those "terminators" are worse than riflemen in every way aside of one additional model in their squad. And maxim setup speed in irrelevant since it has no suppression and narrow cone of fire, meaning it cant do what MG squads are supposed to - stop blobs Yeah I don't think any starting infantry unit is worse than Riflemen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion18 Aug 2019, 04:47 AM If they want to make Rifle Company more viable they need to give it another kind of vehicle like an M3 HT or Mortar HT something like that In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on removing USF and UKF Grenade side techs?18 Aug 2019, 03:21 AM The way I see it is this the most unnecessary and frankly unfair side tech to saddle both these factions with. Neither grenade is particularly powerful but it would be nice to have them in a pinch and not have to delay your teching because of it while your opponent basically gets theirs for free. In most games even at high level that I've seen Axis pretty consistently get their armor first and is usually better than what the USF or UKF player can field so why saddle them with this side tech? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion18 Aug 2019, 02:13 AM Has anyone considered reducing the speed it takes to both build and upgrade fighting positions? I'm not sure how it compares to the much stronger OST bunkers but it seems much slower than it needs to be. Cost seems fine though. The Jackson nerf/fuel incease is most certainly NOT necessary. This is already the weakest/worst faction in the game as such there is no valid reason to be nerfing anything here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion16 Aug 2019, 04:00 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Aug 2019, 03:50 AMMazianni Yeah dude this 3 range increase to short range dps is going to fucking destroy the game balance. Riflemen squads will be wiping team weapons like fucking obers, just you see! God, why is every single thing about USF some overblown concern about how Ostheer is hopelessly screwed since it has absolutely no way to fight against all these (infantry/indirect/tanks/tank destroyers) I mean, how is this change going to make all MG42s and mortars useless all of a sudden? Does this magically give riflemen the ability to ignore suppression and close on gren squads without dropping any models? Do you have this problem versus Ass Engies? Cav Rifles? How come nobody concern trolls about the fact Soviets can't use half of their fucking units No kidding Riflemen are friggen terrible early game for a 280 MP unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion16 Aug 2019, 03:35 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Aug 2019, 02:59 AMmrgame2 Ever considered to raise Jackson pop by 1 instead? Its much better than firefly with the same pop. It also got crew repairs that doubles as jump out build more units trick. Pftt no way. All TDs and heavy-med armor pops are way too high as it is. All TDs like Jackson, Firefly, Jagpanzer IV, should be no more than 14 pop and all later game T3/4 tanks like Panther, Churchill, Comet should be no more than 16 pop. Beyond that there is literally no reason to change the Jackson other than to appears complainers. It is a TD with 0 anti-infantry ability and is rather mediocre against super heavy armor like the Jagtiger, King Tiger or the Ferdinand. It is good against medium armor and Panthers but why that an issue when it's supposed to be good against those things? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why USF so bad in tournaments?16 Aug 2019, 01:33 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Aug 2019, 00:29 AMLoren lol every veteran player? who? I know at least one veteran player who says conscript is op. Ashablois, a user who also participated in the few matchs, agrees that the conscripts are now far superior to Riflemen. Riflemen have been garbage as long as I've been playing since 2017. Nothings been done to address this in that time either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion16 Aug 2019, 01:21 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2019, 22:21 PMthedarkarmadillo Isn't the usf mortar a wehr clone with slightly lower range and a scatter buff as a vet 1? No the range matches the OST mortar now but it still seems like it isn't as accurate but it might be. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion15 Aug 2019, 17:03 PM Why don't you do this for the Schwerer Panzer HQ: Have the Panzer 4 buildable from the standard HQ halftrack but not unlocked until T3. Then put the King Tiger in the SPHQ so it's buildable and not a call in. Then if you lose the SPHQ building you lose the ability to build Panthers and King Tigers but still maintain the ability to call in medium armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion15 Aug 2019, 02:01 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2019, 01:43 AMgbem The falls changes are justified... i dont know what ur on codguy... Okay nevermind on the Fallschrimjagers I stand corrected. We'll have to wait and see how that pans out. But if it were me I'd have them start with MP40s no K98s. On the other hand I'm honestly not sure why they didn't just lower their cost to 350 MP and leave it at that. In: COH2 Balance