Profile of Mr Carmine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1289

General Information


Thread: SU-85 and SU-762 Aug 2020, 06:22 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2020, 02:05 AMthekingsown10 The SU85 definitely needs tweaks no unit in the game should be able to spot for itself STOCK especially a long range one.. . The su85 has no ai, is casemate, not very durable or fast compared to other td,s. I dont see any problem with its vision ability. Maybe a slight rof nerf during the ability should be added to emphezise focuzing on aming. But it usualy gets off only 1 maybe 2 shots in this mode. So its a big maybe imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger VI Overnerfed?1 Aug 2020, 08:40 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2020, 08:14 AMDarkpiatre Keep creating your own stats to fit with what you think, the reality is totaly different, but sure bro, you must be right because it is you bro! I used to be like that in the past. 80 to 90% searching as axis. Nowadays ime its 60% axis and 40% allies. Better then ever ime. The amount of axis up/buff axis and allied op/nerf allies threads do indicate that the axis player base is larger or more vocal at least. Ever since i joined here axis wanting buffs for axis or nerfs for allies have more threads then what allied threads asking for buffs for allies or axis nerfs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85 and SU-7630 Jul 2020, 07:34 AM The su76 just like the m5 or t3 entirely arrive late. Hampering every unit in the tier. The m5 at least can be ussefull as the only stock aa soviet have, but it dies to gust of wind. The t70 is great as ai powerhouse but also short lived. The su76 arives much later then its intended targets and like the t70 only moments before the p4 mostly arrives. T4 and zis are much safer or cost effective choices In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade29 Jul 2020, 18:04 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2020, 17:04 PMVipper It simply means that contrary to the intention as explained in he patch notes they where not brought up to be "on par" but where made superior instead. Okay, that they where made superior, just not by much. They still are closer to normal nades then they are to bundles. Again shocks with nades dont wipe as much as pgrens obers etc do with the bundle nades. That combi is far more leathal for 10 muni more i believe. So i am still not convinced there is a problem with the shocks nade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade29 Jul 2020, 15:30 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2020, 15:10 PMVipper Shock;s grenades are not "on par" with cooked grenades they simply superior. Why is there a problem with shock nades being superior to cooked nades? While certanly they are strong they have very little utility or flexibility. They certainly wont wipe anything like pgrens do with their b nade stg combo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade29 Jul 2020, 14:09 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2020, 13:57 PMthedarkarmadillo Unless of course it say, has a smaller AOE. I'm which case it can be "on par" without being a wipe machine. Again, combined with their short range and lack of utikity/combat flexibility the slightly more effecient grenade is acceptable. If you are not paying attention while shocks close to begin with you will be punished pretty hard, this just gives them burst potential. They can't camo, sprint, equip AT, equip AI weapons, self heal, fire lmgs they pick up on the move, no FRP no forward heals. They do one thing, really well. And that's OK Agreed 100% hits every point on the head. The bundle nade is stronger and comes with units with better or even much better mid and long range dps, but also less hp. The trade off for being more likely to wipe but have lower hp so there is risk involved. I dont even know why this is an issue all of a sudden regarding shocks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade28 Jul 2020, 15:28 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2020, 13:58 PMachpawel Only when u retreat too late or are really unlucky. They can easily spam mines against axis who lose models due to tripwireflare on 4 men squads and mines. They can't really have a sweeper on both sides of the map all the time. Also they have many counters to static positions - flame stuff mainly. Basically they are a bit OP in this region in 1v1 setup. We probably won't agree but it is ok. The dps esp of ost is generaly a lot higher then sov cuz of 6 men squads. Soviet dps is mostly a lot lower cuz of the 4 men squads of ost. Ost generaly wipes 6 men faster then soviets wipes 4 men squads due to soviets lacking powerfull nades and ai upgrades and actual good ai on main guns of tanks. This is the reason soviets suffer more model and squad and vehicle losses they are designed this way. Not just that they retreat to late. They face stronger firepower throughout the game, retreating with 3 models out of 6 still has a bigger chance getting retreat wiped vs ost then with 2 men vs soviets. Soviets can spamm mines but they wont wipe anything you always need to follow up. Ost doesnt need to follow up every time but when they do its with less effort. But the mines are more costly. I see no issues here that is imbalanced. You keep trying to paint soviets op while they clearly are not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade28 Jul 2020, 10:07 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2020, 08:29 AMachpawel I don't think mg42 is as great as it is painted, definitely not in 1v1. Setup times and arc traverse make it really easy to deal with not mentioning smoke or simple flanking or any indirect fire. Tier 0 and pio plus mg42 compo are more difficult to use in 1v1 than typical early infantry spam to cap fast. Soviets are stronger than axis in 1v1 and that is why I really think their munitions economy should be looked at. I'd make ZiS barrage, shock grenade, maybe shock armour, triflarewire, guards ptrs, simply more expensive or just paid upgrades to make them spam fewer offmaps such as incendiary barrage. Not a big change but pretty logical balance path. I dont agree. Are we going to increase all other factions mp cost to reinforce? As soviets tend to be mp starved more then any other faction? Still soviets have the same muni usage as most other factions now. And besides il2 bombing run soviets dont have much one shot wiping off maps. Inc barrage is erea denail, ptrs at rifles excell vs lights and every game usualy has 2 lights build max, so again limited use compared to shreck or zooks imo. Soviet muni income/usage is fine as is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3A1 scout car scaling28 Jul 2020, 08:02 AM The bottun would probably be too strong esp with ptrs penals in the same tier. Needs to be thuroughly tested. Would it cost the same as the guards version? Or maybe it is a training upgrade at vet2 for muni. In dow2 for the sentinal in elite mod you need to buy the stomp to be able to counter melee units. This could work for the m3a1 at vet 2 as well for button imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shock grenade28 Jul 2020, 07:53 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2020, 01:12 AMachpawel Seems like another hidden Soviet gem. They won the war after all. The price should go up imo to balance it out. Same with the mg42, how is that monster of off an mg priced the same as the much much weaker maxim is beyond me, thats exluding the tech cost. The shock nade as long as its eao is far less its price should be less as well. Bundles tend to be a lot more deadly, i havent seen shocks wipe or nearly wipe anything in ages. In: COH2 Balance