Profile of mr.matrix300

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 518

General Information
Register Time: 15 Feb 2018, 21:30 PM
Last Visit Time: 18 Jul 2022, 16:23 PM

Signature

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

Playing with randoms

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:11 AMCODGUY

I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

29 Jun 2020, 19:21 PMIncendiaryRounds

u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.

12 Aug 2020, 10:02 AMProtos Angelus

Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine30 May 2018, 15:14 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 12:52 PMswordfisch I don't mind the puma being a call in but having a get out of jail free card to insta spawn a puma to finish off whatever allied medium tank is cheesy as hell. you know I wish I could pull out an AEC or OKW puma out my ass at times too with the click of a button, but other factions and doctrines don't have that ability. Heavy tanks are different in this regard because you don't usually have 240fuel floating around Because Valentine and Greyhound don't exist ... also I think that if you loose an T 34/85 (or even an T 34/76) to an Vet 0 Puma without HEAT you probably should work on that. Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 14:24 PMFinndeed Command Panzer 4 should be in T3 and its cost reduced slightly. Puma should be in T2 with a CP requirement: 4 or 5. But wouldn't that mean that CT becomes spammable ? I have no unit in my mind which can get build from Base but only one time In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 15:11 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 09:37 AMStug life why not use tier 2 ? the luch does good damage in garrison and there is the stuka too Oh boy ... investing 120 fuel+ till you can clear garrisions In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 01:03 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 00:53 AMShadowLinkX37 Do people not remember when OKW had model 24 frags on volks? And the faction couldn't clear garrisons for shit? Why? Because squads would just hop out of the garrison and then get back in. So say you change it back to model 24 frags and this happens again, thats ok though because you can just clear it with the LeIG. Yes that's a wonderful way of again making OKW t2 completly unviable on a garrison map because none of the T2 units can clear worth a damn. Then people will start bitching about LeIG spam again because it'll be the only viable way to clear garrisons. Then LeIG gets nerfed and will lead to an total lack of anti garrison abilities for OKW so they change back to Flamenade In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?29 May 2018, 20:10 PM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2018, 17:14 PMMr Carmine I never said i want the flame nade behind side tech. Its current tech is fine. The timer did the job. 1+ Jump back to quoted post29 May 2018, 17:14 PMMr Carmine Volks struggeling vs section and rifles is as they should. They are cheaper and have obers later down the line. Rifles and sextion are it for usf and ukf. And volks just dont waltz over cons anymore that is all. Just upgrade your volks and cons will loose nearly every fight unless they go doct ppsh. And Yes obers are not able to solo any and all squads at any time like before. Their dps is a good addition to any infantry force. Okw's atgun can retreat cloak and garrison unlike all other at guns and its also t0. That it can be lacking in other areas is fine balance wise. Its also cheaper. The kubel is an excelent backcapper, it can cap without needing a squad inside wich also has decent dps. Yes it can be destoyed quickly but it does not bleed models. I said non doc "super" heavy tank. No other faction has that. Kv1 churchill etc come no where near the impact a superheavy like the kt has. And the kt not being a auto win button anymore is a good thing. OKW at gun can retreat but it's mortar can't.Also I do not understand how retreating is useful if you die within one shot(as far as I know Raketen gives no cover bonus unlike other AT guns)and I do not get why its bad performance is justified because it is T0.By the time enemy builds his first tank you either already have T2 for Puma or T1 in which the AT gun could be if it wouldn't be in T0 so it isn't that huge advantage ... of course can you build one early in game to counter Clowncars or UC but is it really worth it ? Instead you just can use Fausts and Panzerschreck. I agree with you that the KT shouldn't be a "I win button" but at the moment it is more like a "I loose button".Most players I play with (me included) barly ever get Tiger II(only get him when using Sturmtiger doctrine because of the Commander with additional sight and HEAT shells)but instead invest into somthing more usefull like Pz4s or Panthers.But I disagree with you that Churchill hasn't an impact on the game like KT.Since you can build multiple Churchill's you can get the enemy into pretty gave troubles(even one single one can cause a lot of damage) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?29 May 2018, 19:54 PM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2018, 15:46 PMEsxile So we could do the same for the flamnade, behind T1/T2 building. You notice the difference between a simple nade and an Flamethrower car ? Also Flamenade is neither the cheapest nor the best. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine29 May 2018, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2018, 07:55 AMKatitof Its aura works for every singular unit, infantry AND vehicles. You confused it with unvetted command panther. Oh...thanks.Maybe I should stop trusting the Unit descriptions of CoH2(wouldn't be the first time that it is completely outdated) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?29 May 2018, 13:45 PM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2018, 05:01 AMFiresparks actually the wasp upgrade require the sapper building to be purchased, and the sapper building cost 180mp 30 fuel. the flame nade was justified when the Leig was awful against building and it was the only reliable way for the OKW to flush garrison. the grenade should be switch back to HE now that Leig is actually good against garrison. The close range dps on the storm provide the okw with a okay garrison counter until the arrival of the LeiG. So what ? The 190 MP and 30 fuel would have been spend anyway on the Platoon Command Post so it is no extra cost + UC is the cheapest Flamethrower Vehicle in game but still very potent And I do not get why you wanna remove flamenade because Leig got buffed . Many people (including me) go to T2 to get acess to Luchs since Flak-HT got nerfed.And the HE nade of OKW ... it is a joke (if it will performe the same way as the Panzerfusiliers nade).And even Sturms can't do anything against an Garrisoned MG or Infantry Section In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine28 May 2018, 23:32 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2018, 21:47 PMnumbernin6 Congratulations, but i'm certain in a situation where the ost player was good, he would not just sit the command tank there, he would bleed your zook sections fall back and repair while outranging snares. So your test does not prove anything. Also, this thread is not about the strength of the command tank. The comand tank is fine. This thread is about the timing when the command tank arrives, and the part where you have to spend no resourses on tech to get it. Bleed the zooks ? Like killing one soldier and then falling back to repair ? Also I think that the timing of the CT is pretty fine (maybe move it to 10 CP but that would be all) since by the time it comes out enemy usually has already acess to tanks himself.Also he isn't really good against vehicles nor infantry (at least in my experience).And one last thought on it : Wouldn't moving him to T3 make him spammable?I have no unit in my mind which can be build at base but only once In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine28 May 2018, 23:21 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2018, 21:13 PMKatitof Properly used CT will have a LOT of units around it, so you know, the aura actually is used. I can guarantee you that you will not find many abandoned, unprotected and stationary CTs around. To kill it with zooks, wehr player would have to be braindead. Its aura only works for other vehicles . If he has multiple vehicles + CT then you should have at least one Sherman on the field In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine28 May 2018, 20:12 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2018, 19:53 PMKatitof OPness of command tank was not its firepower... Just like OPness of sturmofficer was not his firepower... Just like most certainly OPness of UKF designated command vehicle was not its firepower... So your test was as pointless as it gets. I just wanted to point out that killing an CT with zooks is not as impossible as numbernin6 and Esxile wrote .Also people in this thread claim that the CT is OP because of its firepower ... so my test was not useless In: COH2 Balance