Profile of mr.matrix300

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 518

General Information
Register Time: 15 Feb 2018, 21:30 PM
Last Visit Time: 18 Jul 2022, 16:23 PM

Signature

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

Playing with randoms

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:11 AMCODGUY

I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

29 Jun 2020, 19:21 PMIncendiaryRounds

u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.

12 Aug 2020, 10:02 AMProtos Angelus

Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Panzerfaust/AT nade bug 7 Jun 2018, 19:41 PM Panzerfaust can't be used in smoke but Soviet AT nades can (including Satchel). Is this a bug or a feature ? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Fix Penals7 Jun 2018, 19:23 PM Penals are just too much of an all-rounder unit.They are a cheap unit which performes a lot better than troops which cost around the same or even more(when it comes to the Solider Price).Even if Units are upgraded they most times will loose to penals (just look at Pzfusiliers f.e.: Pzf. with G 43 Upgrade will loose to normal Penals on all distances except close combat).Penals can also fit the AT role (very effective against light vehicles like Puma and still decent against Pz 4s)while loosing only a bit of their firepower(in comparision to 4 Man Schreck squads) and they also have the Satchel nade which is good to kill tanks and structures(and infantry of players who don't keep eye contact 24/7 with all their troops). So how is this supposed to be fair ? Obers,Volks,Grens need ammo to get at least somehow equivalent to Penals while Penals only cost Manpower In my opinion Penals should start with only 3 SWT 40 and 3 Mosins and then get 3 AWT 40s more for some ammo (60-90)(and maybe remove the tracking ability of the satchel? / maybe make the player choose between PTRS and 6 SWT squad ? (in return the MP cost of penals could be lowered by 20) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?7 Jun 2018, 17:04 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 13:05 PMBrotgrenadier Didnt realize it derailed so much that we're dealing with highly improbable hypothetical scenarios here. I wasn't the one who brought this up so... Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2018, 13:05 PMBrotgrenadier If you are going for his base buildings instead of his actual units, then you are just doing him a favor and make a comeback more likely to happen. Except if you play against OKW,OST and SU In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?7 Jun 2018, 17:02 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jun 2018, 23:35 PMLago The point he was making is that doesn't happen. If you're in a position to destroy the enemy base buildings without losing your tanks then you destroy them all. If you're not, throwing away tanks by attacking the enemy base will probably lose you the game. I did this a few times in 2 vs 2.While the enemy was attacking our VPs I was rushing with 2-3 Pz 4s to his base,destroyed his T4 and then fell back again as soon as the T 34s came to defend it(talking about rank 900-1200(maybe won't work against better players) and btw. If giving the UKF/USF destroyable bases would change no thing then why just don't give OST and SU nondestroyable ones too (for OKW there might be a solution too)? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?6 Jun 2018, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jun 2018, 11:52 AMBrotgrenadier What a laughable Thread. If you are rushing your opponents base and destroying his buildings without him having any sort of AT, then you already won the game anyway. This "Issue" of base buildings being destructable is absolutely irrelevant. Funny enough, UKF is probably the most vulnerable when it comes to base rushes, simply due to them not having AT snares on their main infantry, so really OP is crying about axis getting rushed while UKF is the faction having the hardest time dealing with it. Go ahead and do that, you will soon enough realize that while having 3 SP's is "nice", you will fall behind and start losing more games. Also you'll have to explain what you mean with "building bases", if you want to play Sim city then you should just switch over to UKF tbh. I am not sure if you just didn't care or really did not read any other post of this thread. I am NOT talking about bases which are 100% destroyed but about destroying one Base building (or 2) and then falling back again. And to the 3 SP.I already said what I mean with "Base building" : One player was talking about giving the task of building bases to OKWs SP instead of letting them set up truck ... please at least read a bit of the thread before you complain and 2 Pioneers are necessary if you want to Have at least some AT weapons for Infantry AND want to clear mines too(most times I only get sweepers but then I lack AT weapons) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?6 Jun 2018, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 20:59 PMKatitof I honestly can't tell if you're joking or not. I'll assume you do. So you never use Sweeper or Schreck ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?5 Jun 2018, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 20:19 PMKatitof And any particular reason for that? Starting SP doesn't have any abilities locked for being free and its about cost of having 2 squads on field, what's the point of having 3 SPs? The point of having 3 SPs? One for AT purpose,one for clearing mines and one for building bases( one guy adviced that OKW also should need SP for building bases) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?5 Jun 2018, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 15:46 PMKatitof How getting 2 sappers is easier then getting 2nd sturm? 420 mp is suddenly less then 320? Its not harder for OKW to get 2nd sturm. The first one does not disappear the moment you start building 2nd one, it'll still be there, from start. Having a pair of sturms is CHEAPER then having a pair of sappers. Go on. Argue against that. Argue against math. He wasn't including The Starting SP. Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2018, 03:58 AMLeOverlord The enemy rushes the USF/UKF base (assuming that the USF/UKF player can't defend his base) and destroys USF's Company Command post and then retreats. The USF player now has to spend some time to repair his CCP in order to call in units like the Stuart, 57mm AT and Pak Howitzer. Meanwhile, the Axis player has taken the advantage, because the USF player has to repair his building and then call in a unit. By the time the USF player has called in a Stuart for example, the Axis player will already have a medium tank in the field. Now, USF player has to be lucky and pray for a mistake in order to turn the game. Base raid against USF/UKF is about delaying them in my opinion. The OKW/OST player may loose some vehicles while attacking the base which makes him loose fuel but all the UKF/USF player does loose is a bit of time.Meanwhile if a UKF/USF player attacks OKW/OST base then OST/OKW will loose Time AND fuel In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine4 Jun 2018, 19:12 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 19:00 PMEsxile Same goes for the Ostheer player, thus you are arguing in favor of putting the Puma behind tech. End of the story. So you are complaining that OST players not need to tech for getting Puma but also say that OST have AT weapons such a Pak 40 and Stug III on the field by the time T 34 arrives ? How is that possible if he doesn't tech up? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?4 Jun 2018, 18:46 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 18:38 PMmondeogaming1 Then MG comes then i order my mrotar to shot the MG MG then re positions riflemen and Lieutenant are suppresed movign out of side mortar doesnt know where the MGi s so i shot the grenadier and grenadiers keep clearing riflemen and Lieutenant Ok ... I will stop here answering this since it just will end in an senseless spam of this thread In: COH2 Balance