Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: Volks are disgustingly good, need toning down.24 Oct 2018, 20:27 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2018, 19:06 PMRubberluck When you've got allied base infantry at 280 manpower, you're talking a significant difference of anywhere between 90-150 manpower just to field your first 3 squads, not including the already heavy hitting first sturmpio squad you get compared to REs or Soviet combat engies. That's a 10-15 second head start that OKW gets on you from the beginning, snowballing fast. Makes no sense to me, OKW starts with much less mp to make up for the sturm high cost, so the starting advantage totally depends on how much sturms can make the nemey bleed in the single small timespan where it's actually a worthy cqb squad. Also all infantry squads but unupgraded cons and late game penals perform better. We can debate on performance/cost...but outpermorming allied WFA infantry ? Not even against a single bar/bren, especially with the low combat veterancy bonuses volks get. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks are disgustingly good, need toning down.24 Oct 2018, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2018, 15:36 PM#12345678 OKW Medical HQ cost 25 fuels: Soviet support weapon base cost 20 fuels Irrelevant, hq is tech, including it to medical cost is wrong. Okw healing cost 15 fuel. Typo, i went rifle company before but since cons are being upgraded support is much more common. Difference is minimal, is still 10 fuel cheaper In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks are disgustingly good, need toning down.24 Oct 2018, 14:05 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2018, 13:20 PMKatitof Its bullshit and you know it. Before you go into further mental gymnastics here, let me remind you couple of things: -Penals are not mainline inf, cons are, you're splitting hairs here to make an invalid point and closest thing comparable to penals are obers, who also happen to come in with unlocked abilities. -Molotocs are locked behind side tech cost, flame nades aren't. -OKW doesn't pay a singular fuel more for access to StGs or flame nades, its as free as it gets if you compare actual tech costs between factions. False 1) Penals are mainline infantry by all standards, have been used as mainline infantry in GCS2, everybody but you calls them mainline infantry. 2) Soviets starts with 15 more fuel than OKW 3) OKW Start: -5 2 trucks: 30 Mechanized: 45 Schewer: 120 Total: 190, no healing (worth 15 fuel) needs to pay ammo to avoid bleed Soviets Start: -20 Fuel free healing: -15 Sidetech: 25 (15+10) Support weapons: 10 Mechanized:85 Tank:90 Total: 175 If we don't consider fuel free healing for soviets both pay the same cost This "muh axis free stuff" REEEing bullshit is cringy as fuck In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW needs some nerfs don’t you think?24 Oct 2018, 13:03 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2018, 02:09 AMthedarkarmadillo To fix the Rak cheese all they need to do is buff its accuracy and a bit extra when attacking out of stealth and make it immobile. The thing is pretty decent when it hits but the ground receives more shots than anything. Creeping death is simply cheesy and if it's there to make up for its poor performance it seems like buffing its performance is the best for both parties. Making it immobile when camo but effective promoted planning and ambush, clearly its not to be like other AT guns so let's just make it effective at its intended role already. And give it back its +5 range at vet. This thing dies to a sneeze at least reward keeping it alive by only being slightly shorter range than other AT guns... Raketen can't be fixed. The issue lies within the low profile of raketen, those ground hits aren't misses but collisions. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW needs some nerfs don’t you think?24 Oct 2018, 13:01 PM In this patch usf is getting some potent early game commanders and ukf is getting good general tools. Would wait and see. Sure as hell it isn't OKW fault, OST had very good results too. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks are disgustingly good, need toning down.24 Oct 2018, 12:33 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2018, 02:03 AMthedarkarmadillo Yuup. The quick throw plus long range means less down time too, you can pop the nade then scurry to cover and start shooting. The molitovs short range compounds with its long throw and translates into received damage that volks generally don't need to expose themselves to.for something the Soviet have to specifically get the volks sure do a better job of it.. Fun fact: soviets don't need it Soviets can count on flamethrowers, mortars and satchel as early counter garrisons. Okw specifically got flame nade to be able to counter early garrisons. That nade has been nerfed in arrival time and got a fuse to reduce its impact. Before that, mg spam could kill a game in 2 minutes. It has been how much ? 5-6 patches in a row with you guys conplaining about flame nade ? Don't really wanna be the asshole here, but what about you actually find a proper solution and replacement to it and propose it ? Sturm flamethrower ? ISG tier 0 ? What ? Ps: Flame nade cost is included in sws Trucks, so it's actually a negative, not a positive. What if we added 15 fuel to soviet tech costs regardless of you going for penals build ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch24 Oct 2018, 12:25 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2018, 17:48 PMTiger Baron If it's so true then why not quote me funny man? Show me how true it is that I've repeated the same exact thing about the Artillery Pit every week or 2. I have mentioned it along with the 221/223, Panzergrenadier repair ability, forward retreat point for both Eastern Front Armies, Forward Supply Station for the Ostheer, Panzer IV F1 and multiple others a few times each at the very least, incorporating them into different suggestions and ideas that have always been relevant to the discussion at hand but I have never, ever repeated the same exact thing each week. Chill dude In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch23 Oct 2018, 13:20 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2018, 11:57 AMJibberJabberJobber Something something planet smasher's something artillery pit Lol true In: Lobby
Thread: Volks are disgustingly good, need toning down.23 Oct 2018, 06:11 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2018, 00:45 AMJae For Jett Just so people stop making up numbers and throwing out irrelevant stats: https://coh2db.com/stats/ Volks squad DPS at max range: 5 (models) x 1.807 (DPS/model) = 9.035 (DPS) Cons squad DPS at max range: 6 x 1.06 = 6.36 Volks effective durability: 5 (models) / 1.0 (RA) = 5 (effective models worth of durability) Cons effective durability: 6 / 1.09 = ~5.5 Volks DPS / Cons DPS: 9.035 / 6.36 = 1.42 = 142% Cons durability / Volks durability: 5.5 / 5 = 1.1 = 110% Volks have 42% more dps than cons at max range than cons. Cons are only 10% more durable than volks. So those values have been changed without even mentioning in the OFFICIAL changelog ? Edit: So i'm not crazy https://www.coh2.org/topic/6598/coh-2-dps-spreadsheet You would expect an old source to be relevant if no change is showed on official game changelog. Looks like a ghost buff. My bad In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks are disgustingly good, need toning down.23 Oct 2018, 05:48 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2018, 00:04 AMTobis Where did you get these numbers? Grens: Accuracy: .748 : .661 : .598 Volks: Accuracy: .748 : .713 : .679 Cons: Accuracy: .757 : .660 : .557 Literally everything you are typing is lies and misinformation. Official changelog, go page by page and use the search function. In: COH2 Balance