Profile of #12345678

Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 19:12 PMaerafield

Does someone know the player "CPU - NonStandard"?

He always instantly leaves after typing "my team weak gg" in chat
- if he doesnt like your build order
- if you dont follow his commands ("we all rush to fuel, nobody goes to ammo or VP point!") or dont follow his ping spam
- if you dont go t1 as soviets
- if he loses a squad early
- if you dont control all 3 VPs 5 minutes into the match or
- if he gets rekt (which happens a lot )

Jump back to quoted post1 May 2019, 14:42 PMFarlion

Wait, are people really coming Brits are weak?

Are we playing the same game where bolstered sections will just outright destroy Axis mainline infantry from minute 5 on or so?

And then when you try to counter with a light vehicle, an AEC will instantly hardcounter any of them?

Those brits are weak?

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2019, 21:46 PMTheGentlemenTroll

A thoughtful and interesting doctrine choice is better than making a new commander that cobbles together everything you need than gets picked 100% of the time. Il2, t-3485, and shock troops is not only super bland would probably be the best commander in all modes.

Same reason Grand Operations won for OKW, it has more flavor and Interesting ideas than a doctrine that gives it a bunch of at options that add little to no flavor.

Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2019, 02:13 AMkingdun3284

Not as easy to use as Stuka diving bomb, not as unique as SDB, not does its job like SDV while having similar price as SDB.

Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2019, 01:02 AMJae For Jett

...but it's not meant to be used for area denial - at least not in it's current state. It has a current role (one thats fairly unique within usf), and it performs really well within that role. Fair enough if you think its role should be changed, but you haven't made that argument and haven't given reasons why this would be a good idea.

And sure, other USF offmap artillery options perform the role adequately (though I'd personally argue a little less than adequately). Time on target, though, performs this role really well.