Profile of Loren

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 107

General Information


Thread: Why USF so bad in tournaments?16 Aug 2019, 00:29 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 11:09 AMgbem HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA every veteran player here will state that rifles are far superior to cons... this is just ridiculous lol every veteran player? who? I know at least one veteran player who says conscript is op. Ashablois, a user who also participated in the few matchs, agrees that the conscripts are now far superior to Riflemen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why USF so bad in tournaments?14 Aug 2019, 07:32 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2019, 07:29 AMStug life How to spot a fan boy: “cons are better than rifle” that means baseline infantry needs cost-effectiveness. it's same scenario as Assault grens wins rifleman, but why assgren su1cks than rifleman. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why USF so bad in tournaments?14 Aug 2019, 07:27 AM USF's Rifleman has 0 advantages for make baselines. even conscripts are better. 280/28 cost is same as Tommies, but look at the specs. why so ineffective like this? Rifleman in most cases are forced to hug cause Garand has low long-range DPS. semi-automatic rifle in ww2 is trash? :/ what a historical accurate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Now we need a bug fix rather than a balance patch.31 Jul 2019, 14:55 PM The balance of this game has been revised for quite a long time. Many balance patches have resulted in a number of skills, changes, and units, and as a result some units have changed their purpose, such as the Panzerfusillier. The balance is fine, but now there are too many bugs. Vilshanka's UI bug is a terrible example. I suggest that fix the bug once on a large scale before change the balance again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Super AT Guns1 Jul 2019, 07:24 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 18:58 PMShadowLinkX37 Brace given to both, but brace is changed to a lower damage reduction instead of like 80%. Something like 40%, a point where an IL2 bomb drop won't outright kill it, but may leave them with 20% HP. Give scuttle to both emplacements so you can get rid of them and move them a bit without losing your resources or having them be so far back they're useless. Pak43 loses transdimensional shells. Totally agreed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New USF doctrine is too good26 Jun 2019, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 08:39 AMblvckdream - Sprint + Rangers with elite zooks = Terrible idea. PzGrens with Shrecks are ok because of 4 men but on a durable 5 men Rangers squad this is just another silly idea. The power creep with this doctrine is once again just too much. How many more buffs does USF get??? * more cheap, 0cp, 5men x2 Pzshreck + snare skills for Panzerfusilier In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations26 Jun 2019, 08:59 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2019, 23:05 PMdistrofio Maybe the word you seek is "reliable" instead of 'best'. A single Pz4 shot is as effective as shermans AP. No. All Sherman's AP rounds AoE radius : 2 Pz4 AP rounds AoE radius : 2.5 not 'as', more. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF “problems” (mine at least)23 Jun 2019, 07:06 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 23:08 PMWiderstreit USF gets 3 different infantry squads by teching, you want more? And the hole fraction is maybe the most powerful in early (depends on the map) because of tanktrap cover and early mortar. Well, Lt. and Cpt. are almost same as Riflemen. They just have some skills, not different basic concept. Even them can use skills when you group them togather.(Riflemen + Lt. + Cpt.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 11:22 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2019, 11:16 AMLago It's Lanchester's Law. The smaller force takes disproprotionate losses. If you fight four squads with two squads, you won't trade evenly. You'll lose both and they'll lose one. It's why blobbing is so effective. Your test is equivalent to throwing four Ostwinds at the T-34 in succession. Almost everyone know's Lanchester's Law. Point of this thread was "ostwind's penetrations". Is it the right balance that Ostwind penetrates so well from the front? Is AA means Anti-All? ps : And according to Lanchester's law, two Ostevints must be destroyed at the same time as the T-34/76, in order for Ostwint to have a quarter of effectiveness. In this case, according to the Law of Lancaster, both of them survived, so they are about half the effectiveness In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind's penetrations22 Jun 2019, 10:21 AM What the hell is this sh1t? Completely OP In: COH2 Balance