Profile of Maret

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 711

General Information


Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 17:20 PM IMHO in ideal situation i see cons as core unit that could be trained to shocks or guads if proper commander choosed. That will be looks very organic (conscript become veteran) to overall faction design. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 17:15 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 16:49 PMStug life i alredy said them, if u actually read post , nerf penal nerf t 70, buff close and mid range dps for cons, make the maxim suppress but make it longer set up time if there is really a need make the 7th man upgrade to tier 3 but with a side tech or not if the t 70 is nerfed right About penals i totally agree - they one of reasons why cons and maxim still underdogs, because you can play only penals and faction don't looks broken. IF you want else nerf t-70 it means cons + maxim must become very sufficient unit to be on par with grens with lmg+mg-42. And after all these changes, when penals will be nerfed and t-70 will be nerfed, we also must avoid situation where we will get dead t1 and dead t3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 16:32 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 16:21 PMStug life if it's just as u said the tournament would have a 100% win rate for okw, which I don't see, and actually see that they are balanced with a bit of an edge for soviets My God...it's maybe gold quote that everyone can use to not change units of opposite faction. DOn't you see how silly it's sounds? "Ostwind broken! if it's just as u said the tournament would have a 100% win rate for su, which I don't see, and actually see that it balanced with a bit of an edge for ost." "Pgrens don't have usage, they come too late and cost too much! if it's just as u said the tournament would have a 100% win rate for su, which I don't see, and actually see that they are balanced with a bit of an edge for ost." "Cons broken, no one use them with real opponents! if it's just as u said the tournament would have a 100% win rate for okw, which I don't see, and actually see that they are balanced with a bit of an edge for su." Let's stop this school-level trolling and try to find decision, instead blaming each other and make aggro from different words. Do you have your thoughts about cons performance in-game? You by yourself tried use them against strong opponent, without doctrinal weapon? I think no. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 16:15 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 16:07 PMStug life then how do u call an unit good ? if i don't compare it with somehting ? his stamens are they are god like units, when they have the performance lower or similar to other comparable units for example i could say all soviet team weapon are god like cause they have six, i u can't compare it to other mgs this statement would be true Use your mind, don't feelings. There is one simple thing - if unit don't use, this unit maybe broken. How often you saw ostwind before patch in 1vs1? When you in competitive 1vs1 saw cons? When you saw maxim? In theme with mg-34 i suggested give OKW maxim with 6 man and give SU mg-34 with 4 man. I think you can understand by yourself which mg from these 2 you prefer the most. Then told me which SU unit you see almost every game, let me say - penals! Almost every game only penals, because their performance close to performance of mainline infantry WFA. Cons need rework as old ostwind, it's very weird that iconic unit in whole faction don't use at all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 15:53 PMStug life cal 50 suppress faster and has a much faster almost instant set up time + more damage, i do think it's a better mg but it does cost more Once again how .50cal works with soviets in 1vs1? Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 15:53 PMStug life ostwind right now has same performance as centaur and is still slower than a cromwell at Speed: 6.3 Accel: 2.1, while having only 110 armor so stop with god tier bullshit now that it works vs AI Once again how all this works with soviets? You compare AA with medium tank...Ok, let's compare SU-76 with ... i don't know P4/70, don't sounds weird? It's all sound as trolling, compare nonsoviet-units in theme about cons and use this as argument to current perfomance in OSTvsSU. OKWvsSU matchup. Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 15:53 PMStug life every unit is powerful in the right hands u still don't know what makes it as "powerful" as u say puma has 0 ai so what u shock with puma ? (if ur argument is that puma counter t 70 so does the su 76) Yes you are right, puma clear AT unit, but no one build only puma against SU. First luchs then puma and if we will be count su-76 equal to puma...Ok, what we will do woth volks-stg blob and cons? You reasonable evading from considering this element in overall problem? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 15:51 PM As i already told: do economical changes to cons and then tune them if something will go wrong. Much easier decrease-increase economical stats (cost of reinforcement and main cost) neither trying to make alchemy potion with battle stats. Ostwind got +10 fuel and this decreased shock effect from early arrive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 15:34 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 15:14 PMStug life then u don't skip it anymore right ? again it's his choice if risk vs reward luch is not as powerful as t 70 and stg i think does less dps than the 7th man upgrade in cover(but my opinion on stg has always been to remove them and opt for mp40) flame truck can be armed by normal rifles and is quite fragile + 120 muni cost the ostwind got a price addition so now it's not god tier mg 42 works fine for it's price there are better mgs like cal 50 or dshk Current OKW antisoviet build luchs+puma. Puma makes your t-70 very vulnerable and while luchs push infantry. Volks-stg blob make overall situation more than darker if you choosed cons against OKW. Mg-42 can build from T0 and compare it with doctrinal Dushka don't good point of view (dushka only in 1 viable commander - airborne, i don't remember when i saw in last time Defense or LendLease), while .50 cal don't have anything with soviets. Ostwind get +10 fuel cost and turned from underdog to real AI+AA armored unit with blietzkrieg. I think it's more than good. PGrens got price decrease due to T0 (you can build them without deployed T2), you can field them earlier. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 12:56 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 12:37 PMgbem a 10% DPS buff would make them LESS useless against volksgrenadier spam Stats changes for cons IMHO way to deadend. Much better change economical part and then manipulate cost of reinforce neither try to hit in golden apple with stats. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 11:47 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 11:39 AMdistrofio Also cons are not that bad in this meta, they are not for the newest players though, since they will not win engagements 1v1, but they can win most fights with tactics and some mindgames. I wonder if there is a possible way to make cons cheaper to reinforce until T3... to allow some riskier plays using cons. You cant also spam cons if the game has only 5-8 mins and MGs clearly dominate that time frame too. I already told that to make cons viable should only 2 ways: 1. Stat changes 2. Economical changes If we don't want turn them to more potent infantry units, we should decrease economical pressure on player when he play through cons. Main problem in MP drain. 1. Decrease cost of reinforce to 16 mp, when medics deployed. 2. Fasten reinforce when T1 or T2 deployed. 3. Fasten sandbags instead flare mines, which help them easier build defense and fight against enemies. 4. Decrease Muni cost of molotovs with teching. 5. And maybe slightly decrease their main cost to 220. OST have mg-42 and early PGrens, OKW have their volks and sturms. Each german faction have tools to deal with such defensive oriented infantry. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do people think of Conscripts after the patch?2 Aug 2019, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 11:30 AMStug life they do have 80 more hp tho Don't have non-doc weapon upgrades, don't have normal grenades which have every other mainline infantry in-game and still your MP drain, why? Why volks that have 80hp less and cost only 10mp more, can beat them from dusk till dawn without efforts? When grens get their mg-42...but you know what happens in that case with cons. In: COH2 Balance