Profile of Alphrum

no. they completely wreck volks and grens and u want them to have the same OR lower pop cAP, then lower ther combat performance too but thats not guna happen mate.

Jackson dealt 240 dmg before, while rare, it could bounce a P4. Sight was 40 + 5 on vet2.
2 and something years ago it was buffed in terms of HP from 480 to 640 because it's firepower was nerfed and sight reduced. So all in all, Jackson received slightly bigger nerfs than buffs during the years. Crews should not be touched at all, maybe increase damage on them while repairing, but that's it.



And that, of course. It's a faction trait and mostly only the most butthurt whereaboos complain about them, not noting that they induce a lot of micro on a micro heavy faction. Hence pios get repair boost with sweepers and are generally much more useful in a game than echelons (glorified zook carriers). Stormpios are a bit overloaded with jobs but that's not generally a bad thing since they also have repair bots on one of their core buildings. All in all it works out.

dude what the hell are you on about? are you skunked fam? Jackson has received overall BUFFS OVER THE YEARS, and it was way over buffed hence some of the recent nerfs and its still considered to be the best non doc TD in the game. Back in the day USF was USELESS in late game because of the Jackson, couldn't even reliability PEN axis tanks from the front they were FORCED to flank to penetrate. pls for the love of god stop talking about the the panzer 4 bouncing off the Jackson, that used to happen in like 1% of my games and now its gone to 0 wooooooooooo BIG NERF FOR JACKSON.

USF is micro intensive? every faction is micro intensive in 1v1's and if your talking about teams games USF, is some of the LEAST micro intensive thanks to being one of the easiest to A move your blobs.

and regarding faction traits, yh every faction had them and have been constantly nerfed over years to reduce the effectiveness, and OKW is not the only faction that can put structures out of their base ( AT CONSIDERBALE RISK OF YOUR ENTIRE TECH) so can UKF..

im not saying remove crews , where did i say that katitof? learn to read, i said it needs nerfs or more risk

voted for t1 too but this is a 1v1 only issue, ostruppen are terrible in team games. But has the mod team realised that ppl are crutching on ostruppen? and that grens are underperforming

Thank you for your perceptive.

For those of us who've tried to use Penals in the live version, we aren't worried that a few small buffs will make them OP, even if the changes are all buffs instead of nerfs. Penals in the live version are expensive to buy, leading to slow starts, and expensive to reinforce, causing a players to be starved for manpower. The PTRS's are currently just good for sound effects versus late game armor, but don't really damage anything, while leading to a lot of bleed while trying.

as they should be. no way in hell are PTRS supposed to counter heavy tanks in anyway. If you use PTRS vs heavy tanks YOU SHOULD BE GETTING HEAVY BLEED.

You have spios and you should always be able to outnumber them.
Kubel is also surprisingly effective vs tommies if there is no UC around and if there is UC, you can easily, especially now, outcap brit and get to LVs faster.

Its also much easier to close on IS with volks now that IS no longer is capable of easily bursing model down.

So yeah, that matchup is fine in early game.

and is this from your game experience or you just theory crafting?

Literally, everything you mentioned is not true and does not occur in game. sturms can on only ever win if they catch Infantry sections out close range otherwise they get rekt on approach, kubel gets rekt by IS unless ther standing in red cover which any player with half a brain would avoid + UC is mostly ther anyway vs OKW and volks loses to IS at all ranges so idk how your saying they can close into to IS.

it boggles my mind that ther are people here who say, this is fine, that is op, this is UP and yet they haven't even touched the game