Not sure if trolling hard with poor language or just that stupid.
The linear graph is over certain duration, you should be looking at bar graphs, which are updated for the last 7 days, but you can still narrow linear graph to the specific period.
That means they DO show % for the patch and ARE up-to-date.
These are the FACTS you decided to conveniently IGNORE, because they did not support your poor cause.
Long story short, I thought this thread was created by a newbie who needed help, it ended up being a QQ rant from a noob who isn't willing to improve himself and is doing all he can to put the blame on everything except the real cause of bad play-himself.
Less utter ignorance on a die hard fanboy level, more being humble or you're deeming yourself a noob forever.
I think you are wrong about pretty much everything you said here.
The bar charts are all showing the exact same numbers as the line graphs.
And no, just because you can shrink the scale and see the intervening days does not mean they are actual data points. The samples are taken once per week, the most recent (though will be updated today hopefully) was taken on the 19th - PRE-PATCH. The average between these points is then plotted across the intervening days but they are not data points themselves. Also it is very damn clear that the last intervening day marked is the 19th.
Sorry Katitof. I know you think you are pretty smart, but...