Simply untrue and very cost inneffective / not balanced. In what scenario would one even do this?
As evidenced by tightropes video --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZtaBecIom0 they eat just about anything the allies can throw at them. Yes, he examples USF Para's with 2 LMG's but thats a scenario which you hardly see these days. They also have a faust so any tank that gets close is toast too. Lets not forget about their regular nade AND blendkorper, Oh, lets add some more bonuses to them:
- Can pop out of any free building on the map
- Has camouflage
- can be upgraded with 2 more extra FG42's because they 'need it'
As much as I love my partisan play (remember when they were "OP OP!?!" damage wise they have nothing on these dudes.
Time to normalise the fallschirms again.
He was already proven wrong for this many times in the shoutbox, he just chooses to ignore it to keep on his axis fueled bias dream
https://imgur.com/a/it0USWy
vet 0 vet 5 all ranges
and before u ask, yes commando with 2 bren > para with 2 lmg (the 2 bren have the lmg 34 profile in dps so they both deal 24+ dps at long range)
as always allied fan boi ignore everything ,the only thing u prove is ur knowledge of the game
1 falls don't infiltrate house, so this show u didn't built them even once
2 they have standing camo until vet 2, then they get commando and partisan camo
3 the extra 2 fg are they cause they lose to anything with only 2 base fg42
btw i do agree with mira changes , tho i would have preferred a price increase for the upgrade instead of a nerf to the base fg42, as they stand without the other 2 fg42 they are pretty weak