Profile of Stug life

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2018, 21:50 PMelchino7

The concept of early winning vs late winning factions has been dropped down the moment T70, Stuart, AEC, P2 are no longer autowins if played correctly and vet5 or super wonder tanks been the IWIN buttons for late game.

People here are just trying to find ways to justify their points, when the concept is pretty simple. Rifles with double upgrades are always gonna be stronger, cause USF is not designed around support weapon playstyle. The problem with BARs (IMO) is that they perform well/great at long range, while been designed to be a close/mid range AR. 1919 have no longer been an issue since they removed double wielding. Same route IS will go if there's any future patch.

TBH, this is the first time i read that we should consider things like doctrinal infantry grenades or their weapons upgrades as something "free" as if that had any cost attached to them in the first place.


Double bren/Double bar is already listed. Can we all go back into what other things which are subjective for OP, are right now ? Remember that this is not a community list, more of what OP interpret of it.

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2018, 20:10 PMEsxile

There is not anymore tech cost for those upgrades, I know it butthurt you to admit it but it is like that... Battle phase upgrades act more as timers to slow down Oshteer's access to their upgrades.

Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2018, 15:52 PMKatitof

Well, sov mortar was always terribad, pit got massive nerfs, ISG was brought in line, USF mortar lost quite a bit of range and PACK howi, well, no one even remembers it ever existed so yeah, only wm turbomortar is spreading the mortar cancer.

After bazzilion nerfs it got to every singular stat that isn't model count, its fine.

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2018, 19:53 PMferwiner

That change is almost two years old. Mind that these tanks were either overpowered when the change was made, or had to be buffed later to compensate. Also mind that both units whose armour rear armour have been reduced to 110 have much better frontal armour than ISU-152.

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2018, 18:32 PMferwiner

Why change a unit that is in the ballanced state? You never know how it is going to backfire. There is no gameplay reason to change that stat. The only reason is that some players feel one number in the stats is too big.

Armour values are especially tricky to modify, as thanks to the lack of side armour even a tank shot from the front can get hit in the rear armour, which means it is really hard to think of all scenarios when the unit will perform worse than it should becouse of such change.