Profile of Stug life

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2018, 18:20 PMferwiner

KV-1 is pretty weak, I would give it UT at best in the scale of this thread. Yeah, it has high rear armour, but without it, it would be completely useless. So there is that. Even now there is little point of building it. The only reason why it sees any action is becouse it has been put in one commander with newly overbuffed IL-2.

KV-2 doesn't need rework as a singular unit. The whole commander needs it. As it stands now, KV-2 is not worth its price for how late it comes and how easy it is to counter. Would give it UP in the scale.

ISU-152 is not in the same class of units as jagd and ele any more. Sure, when supported it can be worth its price, though only on the most favourable maps (that are also unfavourable 95% of other soviet units) It definitely doesn't need any nerfs to its armour, especially taking into consideration how quickly it dies when attacked from the front by TDs. In the scale I would give it 'ballanced', with additional description 'situational'.

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2018, 18:00 PMVipper

Quad is actually one of the best AA guns in game. It shoots down planes even at first pass.

KV-1 one is also too cost efficient.

KV-2 needs an overhaul and lower rear armor

Isu-152 needs lower rear armor

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2018, 21:49 PMKatitof

I did.

3 TDs, 2 tanks, ATG, AT infantry and P-47 against lone KT "supported" by 2 infantry squads.

What exactly was the problem there?

There would be a major balance problem if that KT was able to do anything.

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2018, 20:46 PMKatitof

If only rak had a way to close on its targets without being seen.