Profile of Stug life

Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2019, 11:40 AMSeductiveCardbordBox

If you wanted a side to side comparison, testing is faster than calculating scatter. I can sadly do neither from my phone, and would need to do a butt ton of work to estimate scatter accurately even with the in game stats.

But that's not what my post was.

I posted it purely in the context of, on paper discounting scatter, the StuG and MK VII take similar shot counts to kill each other. Which is a vague point I did not originally bring up.

Somebody said it was BS and I laid out the numbers as to why it is not.

That was it. That was the whole context of my post. The only conclusion I put out about it was that a pair of StuG, who cannot miss so scatter doesn't matter, are ample to counter a Churchill. Which they are.

But to be fair, a StuGIII can pen the Churchill with 70% chance at range 50, they both need on average 13 shots to kill each other. So StuGs and also JP4s are very decent counters if you're able to set up an elastic defense.

Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2019, 21:07 PMHannibal

I don't get your point. This is is exactly what I wrote.
Cons are better to snare (I also already wrote this is my post), but Soviet builds usually favor T1 even despite the current patch so you often don't face cons. Riflemen, hated or not, are still the backbone for most USF builds (and I know that there are viable assault pio and pathfinder builds). In a normal game, you have (as I already wrote) 3-4 Riflemen out, which are apart from a Soviet con build more units with snare than any other normal Allied build.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, since basically I already covered most of what you commented on. Please elaborate on that.