Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: MP40 Volks Under-performing27 Dec 2017, 08:58 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2017, 08:39 AMwandererraven compare to PPSH-41 and Mp-40 Acc 0.2/0.43/0.621 and 0.12/0.24/0.66 moving acc 0.75 all dmg 4 per hit ROF ppsh 6 (but if close range Boost to 9 ) and mp-40 8 if Mp-40 need buff mid range acc boost up about 10% ? Now check what close and mid range is for PPSH-41 and MP-40. (its rather hard to compare weapons without comparing the actual curves). Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2017, 01:02 AMZombiFrancis No unit is flagged as 'elite' in CoH2. It is not a thing in the game. What does (now) exist are different versions of certain slot_items, specifically the PTRS that have different values depending on which squad is holding it. This is a very recent addition and the only thing that could delineate a squad as 'elite' because one might decide to call the Guard version of PTRS the 'elite' version. .... Elite infatry do exist in the game from the beginning of the game. PGs, Shock, Guards and Penals where always considered "elite" compared to grenadiers and conscripts that are considered mainline inf arty (regardless if they are "flagged" or not). "Elite" versions of weapon is not a new thing it also exist from the beginning of the game. (For instance shock troops are able to fire lmg on the move) Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2017, 08:19 AMblvckdream Show us a video of your testing. Vet 5 LMG Obers loosing to a PPSH cons squad that is approaching from max range without Urra is something I cant believe without evidence. Instead of demanding a video what don't do the same test and come back with the results? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is OP conscipt smg blobs the new meta?25 Dec 2017, 23:38 PM PPsh upgrade is a badly designed ability. It combines a sort range weapons with a long range weapon. To make things even worse it is combined with a "hit the dirt" a defensive ability. The ability should simply be redesigned. It could become an ability allowing Conscripts to fight better but then it should only be available to commanders with no call-in units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: new ISG is lol24 Dec 2017, 18:52 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2017, 18:45 PMGrumpy What is your point? That contrary to the quote which I include that claims that Leig has a "long range" it has the typical range of 80. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: new ISG is lol24 Dec 2017, 14:08 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2017, 13:57 PMBravus ISG have long range but is too slow, the others mortars like the USF is instantly move! "Le.IG 18 The Le.IG is being made to require more micro to use at its full potential, but will now be more readily available and will now allow OKW players to be aggressive against support heavy builds through the deployment of smoke. ... Auto-fire range from 100 to 80" same as Ostheer/Soviet mortar. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: new ISG is lol24 Dec 2017, 11:24 AM For Le.Ig it would would be worth testing with 2 fire modes (similarly to when it was released). Direct fire mode with limited range and indirect fire mode with high fly time and minimum range. Instead of the automatic change like when it was released it should be a toggle. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 100% Axis/Allies HELP23 Dec 2017, 16:20 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2017, 15:58 PMMarkoMKD 1v1 2v2 3v3 are the search parameters and i didn't changed anything since the last day i played... and this is 2nd day in a row. There is some kind of bug but i don't know how to fix it this usually happens when you do not have the latest patch. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: [DBP] Royal Engineer Doctrine feedback thread22 Nov 2017, 16:31 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2017, 16:28 PMSully The whole point of the commander? There shouldn't be a linear way any commander forces you to play. If a player wants to make the current fragile UC a command vehicle they should be able to. It's simple risk/reward. A UC as a command vehicle was OP in the past because A) the recon was free and a no-brainer, and B) it applied the aura to emplacements where it was safe from counter-play. Both have been nerfed, and rightly so. Your preference on how a commander "should" be used isn't a good enough reason to limit player options. Have you ever played with a command UC and double UKF sniper in teamgame? have you even tested a vickers with command aura? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [DBP] Royal Engineer Doctrine feedback thread22 Nov 2017, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2017, 16:07 PMMarkedRaptor The command PZ4 sacrifices its anti-tank capabilities to still have really good anti infantry capabilities. So it's basically like an ostwind. The aura is pretty good if you use it on your whole army, but that goes without saying just like any aura in the game. Thing is, the tank itself is worthless and having to go AEC contradicts the commander which are both glaring problems. I can see your complaint that it comes in at 2 CP though, and that's probably where the problem lies. It has to make the tank crappy because it comes so early and the aura makes british infantry strong, but if the command ability came later it wouldn't have to nerf the crap out of the tank and would probably make the ability feel good to use. and that is why i suggested that aura scales with veterancy or be supplement by a timed ability similar to ostheer artillery officer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [DBP] Royal Engineer Doctrine feedback thread22 Nov 2017, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2017, 16:03 PMMr.Smith True; the centaur isn't really affected by the reload penalty. However, the centaur is still affected by the +100% cooldown and -50% accuracy penalties. "Command Vehicle We are readjusting some of the most extreme risk-reward elements of the ability to allow it to be integrated in more strategies. Command Vehicle no longer affected by a speed penalty or a received accuracy penalty. Still retains the -50% accuracy and the +100% reload time modifier." There is not mention about CD penalty in patch notes. By vet 1 Centaur can use its ability which I suspect is not affected by the penalties. In the end of the one should compare what DPS the CV has lost to what DPS all the units around it have gained... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [DBP] Royal Engineer Doctrine feedback thread22 Nov 2017, 15:58 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2017, 15:55 PMMarkedRaptor The thing with the command panther and panzer is they don't sacrifice much to achieve their aura. Wheras the Command vehicle ensures that vehicle is never going to be used in combat again. If I recall, Cooldown and reload is mostly negligible on infantry but really good on say, tanks. So you sacrifice 100%- reload and -50% Accuracy to make another tank shoot 20% faster and 20% more accurate? Feels like it just forces everyone to always command vehicle the AEC. Which contradicts the commanders logic of having Stand Fast as well. I like the idea of coh1 how having a command tank buffs up an armor company, but making a command tank straight up useless in combat doesn't feel satisfying at all to drop that much fuel on. Compare the Command PZIV and normal PZIV vs any meduim tank and you will see what you have sacrificed. In addition the CP for command tanks is allot later. Calculated the DPS bonuses from CV on a vicker, a sniper or 2 Ro Eng with dual piats and you will see what you gain from a command vehicle from CP2. Or simply test the unit in the DBP and see the results. In: COH2 Balance