Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Why DBP is destined not to work16 Nov 2017, 18:25 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2017, 17:54 PMEtherealDragon .... INB4 I know that many of those units also had other changes that are nerfs but let's dispense with the myth that this patch is one giant axis nerf and allies buff This not about which side got more buff or nerfs but the sear number of changes. Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2017, 17:54 PMEtherealDragon Except not really... it's obvious you think that Axis is the nerf side and Allies are buffed but look at the sheer number of Axis buffs that people seem to glaze over It would be allot easier for this debate if you stick what is actually written and not to what is "obvious" to you. In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer perspective from a mostly OKW player16 Nov 2017, 17:48 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2017, 17:41 PManerkas .... But then doesn't the fact that you have to put a lot more effort into a faction (OST) to get the same results you would get with a lot less effort with another one (OKW) make it by definition inferior? Actually it is not Ostheer that is "inferior" but OKW who are superior as all WFA. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why DBP is destined not to work16 Nov 2017, 17:32 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2017, 16:29 PMMittens Most of the changes have been issues since the release of the game or factions. A lot of the changes in fact are pretty already community known issues and or requested changes. Take for example the ISG smoke barrage, or the Jagtigers 128 range HE shells/95 range. I think all around its a better fine tune of what we have know while addressing large game issues No they are not, there is a very big number of changes in key units, in each stage of the game. There are profound changes in nearly every aspect of the the game (atg, artillery, tanks, infantry light vehicles...), with substantial nerf on one side and some times buffs in the other. In: Lobby
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know15 Nov 2017, 15:54 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Nov 2017, 15:00 PMsherlock ...The new members in the squad will not have the armour, however against stgs and in the late game armour doesn't mean much anyway. ... Actually armor is more effective than received accuracy vs ST44 because it certain like bars and ST44 re-roll missed shots. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What is wrong about playing only one faction ?15 Nov 2017, 08:48 AM Its a game. It is supposed to be fun, so play as you like. People on the forum thou tent to act like lawyers trying to turn things personal instead of looking at the validity of claims. In: Lobby
Thread: Arty in DBP15 Nov 2017, 08:43 AM People should have a closer look at Priest and the buff in AOE it got, since it one of artillery pieces that is harder to counter: Mid AOE from 0.15 to 0.28 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Replay Feedback for December Balance Patch14 Nov 2017, 08:52 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Nov 2017, 07:15 AMHon3ynuts 0 VS Luciano Tobis Hon3ynuts VonIvan Thanatos .:PSG:. RedxWings 3v3 in DBP 1.3 by: Hon3ynuts map: Unknown 1 - Forward retreat point Is this supposed to make me pay extra to reinforce nearby? I didn't notice the difference. I was watching my manpower as i pressed r for my units didn't seem to make me pay more than 40 mp for obers. The cooldown is incredibly long. I don't know if its worth a whoopping 300 manpower anymore, especially if i was actually paying extra for reinforcing. There no MP penalty only reinforcement time. In: Lobby
Thread: B-413 Nov 2017, 10:19 AM Direct shot can surely be redesigned to become more useful. Make it work like Pershing/tulip shot and replace HE with AP round. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: December Balance Preview11 Nov 2017, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2017, 17:49 PMsherlock Sorry, but no one in the history of playing ostheer ever came to the conclusion that he/she should move their grens closer. Grens win more clearly the further away they are. No one playing soviets ever used orah to get away from grens since cons lose the further away they are and win the closer they are. In your comparisons you neglect the health pool. We had this discussion and I showed you the calculations in the other thread so I won't go into this. And that is exactly my point, if the conscript optimum range is far all fight will take place far since non will have a reason to move. This change simply reduces the effect of "relative positioning" without achieving the intended goals: The problem with VG is ST44 upgrade and not the Conscript DPS curve. In addition instead of messing with the DPS buffing the Target size 1 (instead of vet1)is preferable because it also makes the merge more attractive. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview11 Nov 2017, 17:41 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2017, 17:35 PMsherlock The chart is just fine. Again, DPS ratios between units are not optimum ranges. The optimal range is the range at which a unit wins the clearest. Talking of optimums by looking at DPS ratios is nonsensical because it completely ignores everything from received accuracy to target size, health pool and so on. Cons, with this DPS profile will lose at practically the same ranges as they did before. Received accuracy and target size practically the same thing and can be factor in easily. Optimum range is not the range a unit wins but the range it trades better. If grenadier vs conscript trade slightly better the closer the get, there will be very little reason for either unit to reposition. Grenadier will lose more during the move while cons will be able to simply ourah away. In: Lobby