Profile of Tiger Baron

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: The maxim change impact too much Soviets.14 Apr 2017, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2017, 08:15 AMTickTack Allowing cons to upgrade a single DP would fill a gap. What's going to be the point of Guards then? Cons get DP, Penals get AT rifles, why the need for doctrinal infantry like Guards? Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2017, 11:19 AMvoltardark It's a global analysis, there is no replay, it's from many matches, playing and watching them... i must be dumb to have to answer that. You just did, so... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The maxim change impact too much Soviets.14 Apr 2017, 08:10 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2017, 07:36 AMDonnieChan where is the replay? Fat chance getting a reply from a well known Allied fanboy, he has his own logic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will we get more commanders and bulletins? 12 Apr 2017, 19:45 PM M4A3E2 Sherman "Jumbo" and I'd also like to see the M36B1 that used the Sherman hull instead of the M10 hull, sacrificing mobility for more armor. Also a Sherman croc. You mostly counted the Axis units. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF need changues & remake commanders12 Apr 2017, 08:16 AM I just think USF commanders need a remake, especially Mechanized, Recon and perhaps Rifle Companies. Rifle is just good for spamming E8s and nothing more. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts y u so bad11 Apr 2017, 18:48 PM Cons should not and are not support infantry, Osttruppen are support infantry but they are used as doctrinal mainline infantry since they can be easily spammed since they're cheap as dirt. Unless you tweak their stats the amount of default upgrades and can get are very limited. Can't give em DP-28s since guards have them. AT Rifles are Guards, Tank Hunter and Penal speciality. PPSh is doctrinal in many commanders. What's left, an upgrade for 8 men squads? And the molotov throwing animation is already in game and I don't think can be sped up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS placement match stats (w/ updates)11 Apr 2017, 10:00 AM At the current moment I don't think plain nerfing British Armor is the logical course of action, rather the British Army as a whole should be balanced so it can be more mobile with less reliance on emplacements (mortar emplacement to be specific, and sometimes bofors) so the balance of power should be distributed along all parts of the Army. If you just nerf British Armor without balancing it accordingly there will be a huge up-roar and the game balance will further degrade, since right now it's clear that even without proper experience with the new patch that's a less than a month old, the Axis are showing a higher percentage of wins. In: Lobby
Thread: Opinion on the "new" USF mortar?11 Apr 2017, 04:16 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2017, 20:46 PMVuther I once lost to a guy that build Raketen that early. Death would be a mercy compared to living with that embarassment Well as I mean, there are those rare instances but I still can't wrap my head around it, what was your situation exactly? Because I'd only ever make a raketen that early for like, a clown car rush, or a wcm51 rush, or a bren rush, hell if I know lol. Ahh, the good old days of the Soviet clown car, before the Western Front Armies came into existence. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Opinion on the "new" USF mortar?10 Apr 2017, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2017, 10:09 AMEsxile I'll keep the argument next time someone cry about HMG34 being too weak. Why 5 months? why not 6? Yes, this is probably the right answer, I should be calling and using it for smoke barrage first and next some extra damage it can deal on auto-fire. The barrage isn't accurate, as I say, it wasn't able to land its shells on an big house at mid-range with vision so there is no extra damage vs garrisoned units. The unit actually is really poor vs buidling, it is just a smoke dealer as Barton mentioned it. My argument does NOT apply to mortars, since there are no other T0 mortars in the game. However, there are 2 other more powerful MGs in T0. So there is absolutely no reason for the MG34 not to be T0 except for the lame excuse that OKW shouldn't be allowed to have almost all of their support weapons in T0, and keep in mind these are subpar support weapons compared to the Wehrmacht, hell the raketen is regarded as one of the worst AT guns in the entire game even because it's bugged. I'd rather that required T1 instead of the MG, who even makes the raketen as their first unit anyhow? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Opinion on the "new" USF mortar?10 Apr 2017, 09:06 AM It's what it was supposed to be before Relic decided to screw with it's stats. If you want a real mortar it can't be in T0. And yes, it's meant to be useless in bigger maps because balance is all about 1v1s and 2v2s, not 3v3s and +, that's also the reason why Axis have dominance over the mid-late game while the Allies have dominance in the early-mid game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF call-ins should be addressed before the big tournament6 Apr 2017, 09:46 AM Yeah, let's bitch about a doctrinal TD while the StuG is left as the most cheap and spammable cost effective TD in the entire game. Brilliant. In: COH2 Balance