Profile of Tiger Baron

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: How's coh2.org and CoH 2 doing?6 Apr 2017, 05:46 AM I believe both the community and game have been doing poorly since DoW 3 was announced. In: Lobby
Thread: Remove Exhaustion from Retreats5 Apr 2017, 20:04 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2017, 17:04 PMDangerous-Cloth I think Relic fired them. Happy hunting. Fired? Don't you mean re-purposed them for Dawn of War III after they saw that they can't milk CoH 2 anymore? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviets needs a buff4 Apr 2017, 19:02 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2017, 18:25 PMLeo251 Soviets and Ostheer are balanced IMO. The problem are the other 3 "new" factions. They are a bit OP. With some luck Brits are gonna get fixed in the future patch. Instead of just balancing one of the 3 new Armies, how about we either bring the 2 old ones up to their level, or bring all of the 3 new to the old ones' level? Bringing down or bringing up 1 of the Armies is not gonna help the balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Swap PIV&Panther OKW to WEHR3 Apr 2017, 20:56 PM I'm having trouble understanding what you 2 want exactly. If this is about switching the OKW tanks over to the Wehrmacht, yeah sure, but then what's going to be so unique about the 2, aren't that what people are crying about in the first place, an Army being unique? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmatch Osneer HMG42-Into-Rape meta2 Apr 2017, 17:14 PM 1. Hey here's an idea, HOW ABOUT WE REMOVE ALL T0 MGs?! 2. Because it gains the ability to effectively with light vehicles at vet 1. 3. Let's see here, it shoots a 7.92mm round compared to the 12.7mm round of the .50 cal, do the math. Not to mention that the .50 doubles as an AT unit while the MG42 needs ammunition, of which the Wehrmacht is very starved, in order to deal with light vehicles. 4. Everything spots for itself, thing is most things have bigger range than sight, meaning that he might have had a sniper there to give his bunker sight. It was actually pretty fucking funny watching an MG bunker destroy a bofors because it was just in it's range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Commander Tweaks Suggestions2 Apr 2017, 06:40 AM I don't see the problem for infantry and tanks to just walk straight through calliope's barrage then. They'll just laugh it off as if it was rain. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Volksgrenadiers Change1 Apr 2017, 23:42 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2017, 15:21 PMWaegukin The volk's problem is that the STG is good at all ranges. Without that, they'd be fine And then they will suffer the same as the cons, bad scale during the late game. What are they gonna do with 5 rifles, tickle elite vet 3 enemy infantry of the enemy while struggling to get to their highest vet? Some balance must be struck. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: It'was our last game, i'm so sad.1 Apr 2017, 20:14 PM Are you sure you were not used to the Axis just being underpowered until now? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Volksgrenadiers Change1 Apr 2017, 14:31 PM OKW's veterancy and Armor are basically the only things keeping it in the fight, since they are facing superior infantry early on and without the Wehr's early MG they fail to hold any ground at all since their own MG is locked behind a bullshit requirement. If they however retain they effectiveness and are not underperforming against Allied infantry I do agree with a slight nerf to their veterancy gather so to speak. As far as the Grenade goes, I'd rather they put the ordinary grenade back rather than nerf the flame one, it's as dual purpose weapon that could simply be replaced like I already said, with a flamer upgrade given to either the Obers or Sturm, however the Obers being late game infantry they're not going to be too effective with it. So I really don't know, OKW is quite in a pickle with their non-doctrinal anti-garrison capabilities. They also have no default smoke for infantry to use, and the Leig has no smoke shells either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS Balance Preview1 Apr 2017, 07:58 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2017, 07:55 AMA_E Plea to forum users: Ok this needs to be said and I'm going to absolutely beg forum users, Please actually read the notes properly and actually play this balance test before commenting, we need your actual advice based on evidence not pulled-out-of ass "I reckon" material, it just clogs up communication channels and if you're not basing it on experience it's practically worthless to Mr. Smith and co. This is a lot more time sensitive than previous patches, it's small, it's fast, and it's gotta be tight. Or it won't happen. Please read the notes properly, play them in game, offer good feedback. What part of Brits need a none-doctrinal none-fuel costing in-direct fire unit that is mobile and easy to balance is not making sense to you exactly? My suggestion about replacing the pit with a garrisonable emplacement and putting a mobile 3-inch mortar team in T1 covers both concerns about mobility of the British Army and balance cries of the Axis about the pit in it's current state being OP. Of course it can be expanded upon but for now there is no sensile reason why not to at least experiment with it. It's also in the scope this time so... In: Lobby