Profile of Muxsus

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 170

General Information


Thread: A message to all tournament organizers 31 Oct 2015, 17:51 PM Please for the love of god don't ever pick <any coh2 map> its so <faction> favored. As examples I can name Crossing, Road to Kharkov or Semoskiy that appear frequently in tourney map pools and are heavily favor a faction. In: Lobby
Thread: Coh2 post patch performance31 Oct 2015, 15:26 PM Oddly, input delay has reduced significantly after the patch for me. In: Lobby
Thread: JU-87 AT Strafe Loiter is broken31 Oct 2015, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 07:38 AMBananenheld i still think croc in 1v1 as ostheer is pretty damn strong, put 1 or 2 6pdr behind churchill and you got a REAL problem. you cant counter it with at guns nor with vehicles because 6 pdrs are penetraing 9/10 shoots on tiger long range. That's just plain false, the pen chance is 60%. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: JU-87 AT Strafe Loiter is broken30 Oct 2015, 16:49 PM The Typhoon rockets are broken because they target infantry and are actually more effective vs inf than vs tanks (I wiped 5 blobbed Volk squads the other day with it). Stuka loiter is plainly overperforming. P47 strafe is incredibly bad and does not hit anything at all. It will kill infantry around the tank at most. IL2 is just bad, really bad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Current state of ostheer.30 Oct 2015, 08:59 AM Pgren current mid range dps is fine (same as falls). 222 armor buff is too big, it will make quad completely useless. Autocannon AOE buff is not what it needs, the main issue is accuracy. 251 should have more armor even without flamers. Storm buff is massive, they should cost much more than 340 MP if they're going to do that. Agree on everything else. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks schreck, necessary evil or no?29 Oct 2015, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2015, 16:08 PMG4bb4_G4nd4lf Gib Volks more AI (rifle damage from 10 to 12), redesign the shreck into a PzFaust-like ability, increase Volks cost to 240 (although it doesn't really matter) and be done with it. I honestly prefer a snare to the current shreck. You buy the shreck upgrade for 90 muni but instead of getting a shreck, Volks get the ability to fire a shreck - for free because you have to buy it for every squad individually. Same range/cooldown as PzFausts but penetration/damage of shrecks. The results: - rifle damage from 10 to 12 basically increases their DPS to a value slightly below Grens - A-moving Volks blobs (with shrecks) won't work (anymore) against vehicles - Shrecks basically get less range/higher cooldown compared to bazookas in exchange for 100% accuracy (same as PzFausts) and the ability to snare vehicles - Volks don't lose a weapon slot The targetable Schreck would make them even better as Pzfaust has perfect accuracy, and clicking F and the enemy tank 5 times does not demand much micro. I like the idea with 12 damage, though that would make them much more powerful than Cons, so the cost increase should be more significant (260 or so, OKW wouldn't even care). Panzerfusiliers would become completely obsolete, but nobody really cares about that. Sturmpios getting the schreck and volks having their dps buffed would also be a good solution. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The real issues with UKF Armor. (makes ATG useless)29 Oct 2015, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2015, 10:45 AMMyself PLS try to avoid to flame wars they are not helpful. PLS try to understand the point of this thread. This thread is not about how OP UKF are but easily they can counter ATG that should act like hard counter to them. Currently ones best counter to UKF tanks are Stug and JP... If people can't counter UKF tanks the tank will have their stat nerfed again and in my opinion that is not the way to go. You don't just build at guns and expect them to hardcounter all enemy tanks. That would make fuel advantage pointless. They are rather used as supporting forces for your armor or as tools to stall for it. Tank nades: churchill nades need damage nerf, but they really should make them more reliable (as of now they my or may not launch on command, even more so when moving) Comet WP: range to 50, slightly less damage, more reliability. AVRE and Croc are countered by any medium vehicle. Warspeed is fine, a slight nerf to churchill speed bonus at most. The stupid movement penalty for Heavy Engineers should just be removed, their armor down to 1.5 and muni cost to 50. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Your opinion on the state of the 22228 Oct 2015, 11:24 AM Completely counters: m3, m20, universal carrier. Can damage m5, m15, AEC. Its coaxial mg has the dps of an M3. Its autocannon is a threat to clumped infantry. What else could you ask for? In: Lobby
Thread: Vet threshold; AVRE 45 KIA + panther and no vet 328 Oct 2015, 11:11 AM Soviet vehicles get vet too slowly and their vet is often bad. Brit armor gets vet quickly, but it it not very good (comet vet 3 has faster movement, more accuracy and auto 3 sec fuse nades. not much compared to Panther vet3) All light vehicles (especially kubel) should be faster to vet up. Infantry in general gets too much vet from AT. Vehicle crew vet should be harder to get but more effective. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brit Sniper shouldn't be able to Crit 222's engine27 Oct 2015, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2015, 08:08 AMKatitof Piats struggle hitting bunkers and you're suggesting them as anti light weapon? In what world? Its not zookas or shrecks that home in. You know, there is a reason why no one ever uses piat after playing with them once. The piats are actually very good for their price, and if you can micro well (i.e. if you're not axis only player), they can hit even light vehicles. Though researching weapon racks as soon as 222 comes out is kinda stupid, so you're right about it not being an option to counter 222 rush. In: COH2 Balance