Profile of Stark

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1

General Information
Timezone: UTC


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch13 Sep 2018, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2018, 11:09 AMTiger Baron I think it's out of the question sadly since they removed the zombie army mechanics from the first game. You know, medics running around collecting wounded and then popping out a new squad. And without it's recovery function it would make it just a mobile repair bunker. No, no, no. You don't get it. I mean IF the recovery option is possible THEN the HT that can repair tanks/vehicules and lay/sweep mines is also possible. So yeah mobile reparing bunker. It reminds me the old Blitzkrieg game series. I suggest replacing Emergency reparing with a HT that can repair stuff to be a cheaper replacement for Sturmpio squad. Of course the zombie army mechanic won't happen and i;m not suggesting it at all. In: Lobby
Thread: GLHF GCS 2!13 Sep 2018, 09:48 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2018, 07:02 AM\|GB\| The Hooligan486 Nope, as i expected university and the life around it is consuming my coh2 life I'll try to catch as many games tho this weekend Lame! Coh2 > RealLife In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch13 Sep 2018, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2018, 20:49 PMAndy_RE Lots of good feedback guys. However, we really like Smartie's idea for a 223 in this doctrine. Apparently, a model exists. Here are a few designs we are thinking about. Thoughts? Andy, have you ever consider a 251 reparing HT as replacement for a emergency repairs? SneakyEye made a HT with Recover a Wreck Ability. That (ability) could be replace with simple reparing squad while active. To make it more atractive it could place and sweep mines as well. It could work as replacement for expensive Sturmpios and those players who don't go mech tier stucture. There is argument that Emergency Reparing isn't worth it cost compare to soviet equivalent so where is alternative option What do you think? In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch13 Sep 2018, 06:48 AM 223 as a cargo (additional upgrade?) after it fills it role early game - sound good. Really i;m all for it. OKW lacks of basic tool - a resources cashes which here we could get. Idea about adding pgrens would also sound as a reasonable option not even in 250HT. But is it all fit the theme of a commander? 223 and a Sturmtiger aren't really suit here. Why not replace a SturmTiger with a normal panzer VI Tiger tank and save SturmTiger for a next december commanders where it could fit more? Tiger fits the idea of Elite Armor. There is so many arguments about Sturmtiger - that isn't cannot be squad wipper but it can't be so weak and expensive on the other hand. Just leave it for a better options better time. Have to add few cents about the Hetzer. @Andy you said it overlaps jp4 - ok fine, but it's the same diffrence between m10 volverine and Jakson, su76 and su85 or t34/76 and t34/85. Jp4 would be just a better version of it and hetzer would be a okw version of a stugIII - just it. Why am i arguing so much about it? Becouse i would love to see some other strat than just going t3 every f*king time to fight medium tanks. Buildable in T0 after T1 and T2 or T3 - would open more diffrent aproach in a gameplay. Same thing i feel about m10. And it's not only me suggesting that thing - don't really understand why are you so afraid about this tankdestroyer. BTW if you wanna extra slots in a EliteArmor doctrine i suggest to merge Emergency repairs and HEAT in 1 slot - "Elite tank equipment" becouse they both works as a tank abilities. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch12 Sep 2018, 11:55 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2018, 00:34 AMKirrik Regarding Commisar, if blobbing was a concern why give that squad retreat point? Soviets dont actually have non-doc healing outside of their base meaining the only way you can realistically use it is parking your commisar near UKF forward assembly or USF Ambulance and we all know it will end very badly with stuka/offmap wiping everything out Grenade was a step in right direction, retreat point in my opinion is not. Unless you want to give this commander a ZiS-6 truck which reinforce and can drop healthpacks or something like that, retreat point will become pointless due to fact you'll have to send your troops back to base for healing, in fact it will become a drawback due to reinforcement penalties This includes teamgames. If you afraid of stuka/offmap wipping - don't use it but don't block the option for others. I would be good if they added some sort of healing to the commander (replacing 1 model for a healer sound interesting) In: Lobby
Thread: Battlefield V WW2 - SEPT 4 - Open beta.11 Sep 2018, 12:07 PM This game is sooo horrible. You can get all kind of weapon no matter that side are you playing on what map are you playing (Narvik 1941 and you can be a british soldier with stg44), tanks are horribly horribly fast and those uniforms... I know, it;s not realistic and historical game but totall opposite of this isn't good eighter. You don't feel at all the climate of ww2 - it could be simple another modern warfare style game... Just hope this game won't sell and it will have horrible reviews - that may stop this nonsens... In: Other Games
Thread: Alternate Settings for Future CoH Games11 Sep 2018, 11:54 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2018, 13:59 PMGI John 412 Korean War only has one vote.... I guess you can just play CoH2 as Soviets vs Americans and get about the same thing. Lol But seriously, maybe not in CoH, but I think the Korean War deserves more exposure other than just MASH and the intro of Hearbreak Ridge. I voted a Vietman war (small fan of that period) but i have to agree that Korean War was really interesting theater. You can pull out 4 factions (USA, NATO, NORTH KOREA and CHINA) it's closer to the warfare style than cold war setting plus fact that this war is so unseen could work as advantage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Alternate Settings for Future CoH Games10 Sep 2018, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2018, 11:55 AMDonnieChan ah come on you know that won't work all that most people know about ww2 is that there are Tigers and panthers, tom hanks and normandy. nobody would want to play with panzer 2s and 3s, already because they don't know them and that this isnt ww2 for them Don't forget about Brad Pitt and Furry! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Steel Division 210 Sep 2018, 09:58 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2018, 09:45 AMnigo Steel Division II is the next step in strategy game evolution https://www.destructoid.com/steel-division-ii-is-the-next-step-in-strategy-game-evolution-521583.phtml strategy game evolution like first Steel Division which after 6 month had 1k playerbase... I;m really sceptical about all of this and i;m suprised you are so eager to see new game. Like the idea of SteelDivision but all this territory concept, small playerbase, horrible singleplayer campaign killed that game. Hope it will be better but no way i;m gonna buy it at release In: Other Games
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch7 Sep 2018, 06:44 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2018, 05:43 AMTiger Baron while some sort of advanced bunker ability would synergies better with the Osttruppen's build power. Specifically about Advanced Bunkers, it's going to be basically forward supply station but split up and given as separate things to bunkers to give them more utility. It would be a somewhat cheaper route but heavily time and micro intensive compared to the fuel costing point and click FSS. Sound good for me. To clarify - by advanced bunkers do you mean mix a heal upgrade with reinforce upgrade in 1? But EVEN visiual change for a bunkers is highly welcome.Concrete bunkers are already in game so shouldn't be hard to implement i guess and it would fit more defensive theme of a doctrine. In: Lobby