Profile of Zyllen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 770

General Information


Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 14:37 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 14:33 PMGenObi You mean rank 115 as okw on the ladder for 1v1's? or my 129 USA rank or 105 Brit rank? And your playcard is where???? I don't give a shit about the playercard your arguments speak for themselves. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 14:35 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 13:35 PMKatitof Do I need to remind you the gap between volks and cons when the price was 5 mp in con favor? Do you know the gap between volks and cons when the price is 10 more then cons? Do I need to point you at 270 completely useless and usnusable current penals vs 280 amazing rifles? 10 mp makes a HUGE difference and we're talking price of one of cheapest GENERAL infantry vs elite infantry priced AI specialists. Get your facts straight. stop straw manning this has nothing to do with volks or my argument. Rush for obers, utilize kubel which penals do nothing against, utilize new HMG OR pick a doctrine. And what better support weapons? You missed maxim nerfs? L2P. Thank you for proving my point again . the okw is shoehorned again into one route. you keep making my live easier and easier What if I told you that 4-5 volk builds are not the most optimal thing under the sun for OKW on the mod? Not my argument so once stop straw manning. 1 , 2 or 10 it doesn't matter this unit needs to have purpose late game. and at moment they get utterly slaughtered. Guess what? They already did that in the mod and StGs are great at short, good at mid and not useless at long in the mod. The only thing that will be proven right is that OKW fanboys relied so much on volk shreckblob cancer that they are incapable of building anything else. OKW gets a proper HMG and you still mumble about volk spam BO. Bloody hell how many times do you keep in brining in stuff that is not relevant. BUT I WILL SPELL IT OUT AGAIN: HOW IS THE OKW GOING TO PERFORM WHEN THEY HAVE INFERIOR INFANTRY AND INFERIOR SUPPORT WEAPONS? And the answer is they dont. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 14:27 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 14:16 PMGenObi This thread is a perfect example of why shrecks are bad for the game, the only time when shrecks had a role is when okw was resource starve, now however its the cause of so much problems. People still want to be able to build Volk volks volks volks until panther or KT. Guys you have to adapt to new strategy evolving combine arms, it should look something like this volks volks, mg 34 raken puma or p2 etc!!! Its adapting time!! No more easy wins of VOLK VOLK VOLKS VOLKS VOLKS VOLKS VOLKS VOLKVS VOLKS VOLKVS VOLKS VOLKS VOLKS VOLKS---->SUPER TANK WIN! The more and more i play the mod the more i relize that shreck volks are cancer. Only noobs lost to that strat, guess we know what level you are playing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 11:30 AMKatitof New penals are incomparably more expensive and they are tech requiring AI specialists, not generalist starting infantry. You keep saying more expensive but dude 20/30 mp is not a whole lot of difference. Also satchel charges are quite good against engine damage heavies. so they are not pure AI. You want to stand up to new penals? Better use panzerfussiliers then, because volks won't cut it and neither should they. Thank you for proving my point. The okw is shoehorned into a single doctrine. not only have they content with superior infantry but also better support weapons. well that's not recipe for disaster inst it? You want infantry relevance in late game? Do what both soviets and OKW did since forever-use elite infantry, either doctrinal or stock one. Yeah i do use it. but what im going to do with 4-5 squads of useless volks past the `15 min mark. throw them away to make room for obers? or use them and keep bleeding large amount of mp. After all without a shrek they cannot support tanks and even with 2 ( at the moment useless) mp44's they are in no position to deal with allied infantry. But i will be proven right sooner then later. coh 1 had the same situation with the volks until they buffed the mp40's to become adequate midrange dps. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 10:41 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 08:42 AMKatitof History matters little when discussing PRESENT and FUTURE balance. 250 is still pretty cheap, especially considering the fact that OKW has extra mp at the start compared to other armies. They are supposed to be tad better cons right now and that is exactly what they are. They will be still reliable and backbone unit, but they won't be the only unit you'll need until panther/KT arrives. StGs are decent replacements for shrecks, they definitely improve them in noticable way, but if you want to be on pair with allied infantry, you need to go for elite inf of your own. From what I've played on the mod, stgs are pretty ok replacement. This only works if they are going to be able to stand up to upgraded and vetted rifles, is and future penals. And this requires some tweaking in their stg's and vet. otherwise late game they are going to be wasted manpower. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 00:50 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2016, 10:05 AMFluffi I agree, MP40's would be nicer than the StG44. It would be a neat nod to CoH 1 Volks, especially in combination with the faust. Plus, as I keep saying: OKW has no MP40s at all at the moment. And, even though StG44's may be "more historically accurate" they kinda feel too "elite" and overkill-like (not talking about stats) on a cheap, mostly not-so-well-trained unit like volks. Do you even realise that the mp40's of the volks in coh 1 where pretty much the same as the mp44's of coh2? they excelled in close and midrange. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?26 Apr 2016, 00:48 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2016, 14:42 PMCultist_kun How about you firsly read my post closely and secondly how about you play with StG volks in competitive edition mod, then you comeback and say us how StG volks are great at sucking against everything but cons. Perhaps it has something to do that the mp44's of the volks sucks balls compared to the pg or sp stg 44. To be honest they suck so muhc i wonder if its a bug. panzerbuche will not work anyway you are creating a squad that cannot AI or AT , something the guards suffered for a long time. I would recommend that the vg's mp44 upgrade price is increased to 90 ammo and that they receive 3 stg44's with the same profile as the pg's In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks really need stg44?24 Apr 2016, 20:44 PM I think its time to return the vet 5 received accuracy buff for the volks. now they are expected to stand their ground to allied mainline infantry and are no longer an AT squad. And before you start bitching remember that without shreks they will not reach vet 5 that fast In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer II is built way too fast19 Apr 2016, 13:05 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2016, 08:00 AMFul4n0 nice Iron Emperor, as we have dealt with fucking early AEC, now it is fine that we have to deal with early luch, great reasoning here man. Well the problem was with the AEC in the past that it was able to go blow to blow with the puma and still have more AI the then the t-70. it was kind of op as fuck. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer II is built way too fast18 Apr 2016, 12:09 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 11:48 AMgeneral_gawain If you have to pay fuel for unlocking incendiary grenades or for shreks you either delay the Luchs or you run a high risk to loose the early game. Not going to happen unless they buff the leigh and rakketten. The okw strength is brute force tactics on the front but terrible support in the rear. In: COH2 Balance