Profile of Myself

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 677

General Information


Thread: USF and UKF bases2 Dec 2015, 12:08 PM Think those 2 issues are separated, one can implement with or without the other... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and UKF bases2 Dec 2015, 11:44 AM Make USF base like UKF base where the buildings Platoon post, company command post and battalion command post don't exist until they are researched... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The HMG-34 veterancy nerfs...2 Dec 2015, 07:07 AM MG34 Heavy Machine Gun Team Veterancy Rank 4 Squad Received Accuracy buff increased from 0.71 to 0.8 Veterancy Rank 5 Weapon Accuracy buff decreased from 1.2 to 1.15 Veterancy Rank 5 Squad Sight Radius buff decreased from 11 to 6 These nerfs are almost pointless since it is virtually impossible get a HMG34 to vet 3 or above. I will be using HMG42 another unit that is difficult to get to vet 3 for comparison reason (and I am not suggesting that they should perform the same). The HMG42 does around 5 times more damage far and around 2.5 times more damage close, it costs around 33% more. Its XP value is 480 (120% more) while the HMG34 has a XP value of 400. All this add up to the fact that the HMG34 vet extremely slow, given units suppressed take little of the little damage it does any while it XP value is disproportional to its cost. Imo the XP value of the unit should be lowered and according to the price of the unit and the DPS, then the changes in the veterancy will make some sense. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?2 Dec 2015, 06:24 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 22:59 PMRollo Brits with the removal of crit shot are lacking in early game AT and the 6 pounder is not the answer Once more time Critical shot was not removed it moved to vet 1 and it is still a snare doing engine damage to light vehicles... Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2015, 00:53 AMImagelessbean While I do partially agree, as the game gets larger the window of time for snipers before light vehicles shrinks. By the time you reach 3v3 and 4v4 you effectively have them arriving almost at the same time (with movement onto field). that might only prove a problem if all members of the team are UKF. Even in that case one of team member can rush an AEC to counter a Luch. In the end of the day I am not sure what the issue is here. Is it that the sniper can no longer hard counter light vehicles from vet 0? Is it that UKF can't counter light vehicle play? Is it that OKW light vehicle play is too strong? Is it that I.S. need a AT snare? Imo the answer to the last is NO since that might improve UKf performance against light vehicle but will make them too strong against tanks and will make blobing some of the strongest infantries in the game even more appealing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Industry Balance Preview. 1 Dec 2015, 08:18 AM No you did not use the ability badly the plane always comes from the opposite side of the map. On the other hand you have some control over the flight path by selecting the drop point. If you had selected a drop point far from enemy truck the drop plane would have a better chance or surviving In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?30 Nov 2015, 16:30 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:56 PMKatitof I'm trying to explain science to potato... I'll just assume you have no idea what scatter is and how it works and leave you at this. Stop insults pls because you will look very stupid once you realize you are wrong. Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:56 PMKatitof Yes, brummbar have low scatter, Actually Brumbar has allot of scatter especial angle Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:30 PMKatitof ..., it makes sense to do it when attacking infantry squads, ...., versus static structures and vehicles its irrelevant, because scatter pattern is already centered on the target, it does nothing for PIATs attacking immobile targets. You are wrong, against vehicles attack ground works fine if it is fire behind them due to collision. Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:38 PMKatitof Updated my previous post, just for you to actually understand how scatter works. Scatter doesn't change depending on attack method, but exclusively range. Wrong again, the same vehicle with the same gun can have different scatter value depending on type of attack... Further more the scatter as number remains the same with range you simply multiply scatter with distance to find how far away the projectile will land from intended target. Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:56 PMKatitof People attack ground to put as much targets inside this rhombus for biggest hit chance. You are not arguing me here, you are arguing game mechanic that is extremely clear and easy to get. The scatter area is not a rhombus it ii closer to trapezoid (although 2 long side are parts of circles) and you have actually draw a triangle. And here is one of quote from official forums demonstrating how good you understand scatter... http://community.companyofheroes.com/forum/company-of-heroes-2/coh-2-balance-feedback/232627-soviet-all-t-34-accuracy 'Compared to a P4 on Coh2stats.com I don't see what it is that makes the T34 so damn bad. I know it's there, I feel it and I see it but I cant seem to track down the number that controls it. There's a very small amount of scatter difference but that's it. There is the ever present issue of the RNG just saying "no" to you but I feel like there has to be something going on.' Comment Katitof : Scatter and reload translate to huge differences. For example 50% lower scatter translates to 400% higher accuracy. Armor of the tanks, penetration at far and AT capabilities of factions also impact it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?30 Nov 2015, 15:42 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:38 PMKatitof Updated my previous post, just for you to actually understand how scatter works. Scatter doesn't change depending on attack method, but exclusively range. For the last time TEST and see... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?30 Nov 2015, 15:35 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:30 PMKatitof People use attack ground on these, because they don't want these vehicles to attack models on the sides, therefore moving scatter pattern outside of effective range, it makes sense to do it when attacking infantry squads, the bigger the squad, the more logical it is, versus static structures and vehicles its irrelevant, because scatter pattern is already centered on the target, it does nothing for PIATs attacking immobile targets. No they do not, built a brumbar and have it attack ground you will see that scatter is minimal. PLS test this before posting... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?30 Nov 2015, 15:23 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:06 PMKatitof You're 100% correct here. It is very promising that acknowledge that. Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:06 PMKatitof I don't think you know how scatter works... Right clicking to attack or attack ground is irrelevant, there'll be exactly the same scatter values and exactly the same RNG. No it is not that why people using brumbar or Dozer you attack ground instead of auto fire... You can actually test it yourself with piats and you will how accurate they are when you use attack ground. Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 15:06 PMKatitof 222 can react to sniper really fast, if you have infantry tracking vet1, you can just YOLO rush the sniper as you'll be aware of its position and potential AT position. If one is afraid of losing his sniper to 222 all he need to do is support him and make a trench, a 222 dies to small arms fire... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shouldn't UKF have AT snare?30 Nov 2015, 14:55 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 14:45 PMKatitof Which means they have no reason to protect 1 model squad as it doesn't exist. Read understand reply. What I wrote is direct answer to the statement that all other faction (accept UKF) have access to at snares which simply wrong. OKW have only doctrinal access (and P. fusilier snare is extremely inefficient) and brits have both Doctrinal and the sniper. Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 14:45 PMKatitof I've had situations where due to PIAT scatter I couldn't hit stationary puma or bunkers. There is nothing effective about PIAT except dealing with super heavies. If you can hit stationary targets as bunkers you simply don't know how to use Piats. As any other weapon with high scatter one has to use attack ground... Instead of trying to prove that other do not know the game try to be constrictive for change and actually make a suggestion. Simply adding AT snare to I.S. as proposed in the original post is bad suggestion that will create more problems, than will solve. So either suggest something or stop posting pls. In: COH2 Balance