Profile of Myself

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 677

General Information


Thread: Partysons interfering with the design and pacing of the game16 May 2016, 07:17 AM Partisans are the only spawning unit that the cost to call them in is the actual cost of the unit and one does not pay a premium. That makes them some of the most cost efficient spawning units. In: Lobby
Thread: LMG Aim time15 May 2016, 00:27 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2016, 23:28 PMSvanh ... I think Katitof's point was more that dual-Brens are balanced against single LMG42s. ... Either way, increasing the aim-time on the Gren LMG42 seems unnecessary. Grens aren't really durable enough for an a-moving blob to be a massive issue. No idea what his point actually is, what he has written though is that only the Bren is balanced, which leave as innuendo that Lmg42 is OP and 1919A6 is not cost efficient because it is more expensive. The thread is not about Gren LMG blobs specifically but LMG blob in general... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer repair speed14 May 2016, 17:14 PM Part of the issue is that only EFA engineer do not have access to Lmg and AT weapon upgrades that allow WFA engineers vet much faster and have access to far better vet abilities. WFA engineer simply have to much utility... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: LMG Aim time14 May 2016, 15:32 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2016, 12:16 PMSvanh His point still holds though: Brens each give a 5 DPS increase while LMG42s give a 7 DPS increase.... Not sure what the point here. That Brens are balanced and Lmg42 are not? Lmg42 are an upgrade for grenadier, Brens and M1919A6 are available for more infantry squads. If one makes the same calculations for Ro.E and R.E. both weapon will be far more efficient than Lmg42. An analysis of comparing Bren M1919A6 and Lmg42 by comparing Tommie's, Rifleman's and Grenadier increment in DPS for coming to the conclusion that Lmg42 is OP, is simply flawed... Most of this is also off topic, since the thread is not about balancing Lmg vs one another, but about Lmg blobs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [May Patch] Remove the self spotting ability from the SU8514 May 2016, 08:26 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2016, 08:19 AMKatitof ... There is nothing with spotting scopes, there is nothing with SU-85 focused vision as there is plenty of penalties going with it, there is everything with falsealarm and his "I'm a scrub who struggles vs AI easy therefore nerf plox" attitude. There is something with spotting scope on vet 2 222 (there should be cap in the bonus) and there is something wrong with Su-85 using "focused sight" and "tracking" at the same time. The combination of these 2 abilities gives a sight of elephant using "focuses sight" and "spotting scopes" or an ISu-152 using "focused sight" and "tracking" and both of them where removed. In: Lobby
Thread: Ost Grenadier Squad Size Upgrade14 May 2016, 08:09 AM If the new patch is implemented as is, I would have to guess that the next one would see Ostheer infantry being buffed. The easiest solution would be to have the start as 5 men squad reduce their received accuracy abit and their DPS to remain in the same levels... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [May Patch] Remove the self spotting ability from the SU8514 May 2016, 08:06 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2016, 06:09 AMthedarkarmadillo Especially when on the 222 it almost entirely deletes the fog of war mechanic Using a 222 to spot is not actually "self spotting". Is using a recon vehicle to do its job. Even on a 222 spotting scope, which as pointed out are doctrinal not stock, are non broken until the unit the unit hit vet 2. In: Lobby
Thread: [May Patch] Remove the self spotting ability from the SU8513 May 2016, 16:35 PM I think you have misunderstood original post, although it poorly written and it is understandable. If I understand correctly OP say that Wer T3 does not not work against Soviets. With changes to Su-85 T4 will work either. I must say that I see some valid point in this. Su-85 not only will counter Tiger but will also counter Panther and totally shut down the "new" brumbar. The Panther will be out ranged and have less sight. In addition attempting a flanking maneuver with a Panther to kill a SU-85 puts a a higher value unit at risk to kill lower value unit. The combination of "trucking" and "focused sight" give the SU-85 the sight a stationary elephant with spotting scopes. If the sight advantage bonus of the Elephant was reduced it makes sense that the same should apply to Su-85. Trucking is available to other units and it is to be replaced by another ability (faster rotation?) In: Lobby
Thread: Nerf Panzerfusiliers13 May 2016, 15:33 PM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 15:01 PMRocket ... Yes, but in light of volks getting a snare?... P.F.'s AT grenade the worse AT grenade because it does the least damage (and it has a minimum range like other rifle AT grenades), the impact of removing or leaving as it is will be minimal if V.G. get Panz.F. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Mod: Trying to kill a fly with sledgehammer.12 May 2016, 13:23 PM I tend to agree that they should take a pause with their mega buff and nerfs and start fixing the easy issues left untouched for years. In: Lobby