Profile of Domine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 500

General Information


Thread: Increase AEC's price from 50 to 70 fuel13 Feb 2016, 17:52 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2016, 17:43 PMSpinflight I thought 222s were only 15 fuel? Saying that two is risky when you can buy four for about the same fuel cost is either a mistake or dishonest... They also have an MP cost. And considerably less impact than an AEC. As soon as T-70, Quad, AEC, Stuart, US AA truck, or similar hits the field 222s are completely obsolete and hardcountered. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase AEC's price from 50 to 70 fuel13 Feb 2016, 17:37 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2016, 17:32 PMGlokta Most of the cost for the other lights comes from the teirs which have other benifits. An aec costs 440/65, more investment than the other lights already. Now you're just randomly cherrypicking costs, COH2 doesn't work that way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just Friggin' Nerf Arty Covar Already13 Feb 2016, 17:30 PM Just wanted to chime in and say that Latch has also said on his stream that OKW can counter anything, including Maxims, and that emplacements are up and have to many counters. Just so you know. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Maxim HMG needs a hotfix.12 Feb 2016, 15:22 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2016, 15:17 PMThe_Courier But so long as Soviet basic infantry gets run over by Volks (and upgraded Grens to a lesser extent), you're going to see Maxims. Really dude? Aside from the obvious polemics, since when are Volks better than Grens in the AI department? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Maxim HMG needs a hotfix.12 Feb 2016, 00:02 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2016, 23:52 PMedibleshrapnel Weren't you the guy who said AEC's arent a problem? Don't you know the Luchs counters the AEC? And then Puma is the counter to comet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther...7 Feb 2016, 08:16 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2016, 05:33 AMHuangBrandon can someone verify the 80% front armor stat too? Every vehicle has 50% front and 50% rear armour. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AEC Armor Car Timing Nerf5 Feb 2016, 09:44 AM To be honest. I would take an AEC over a T-34 any day of the week. It's just too strong vs. inf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW, the only faction with constant cloak4 Feb 2016, 20:25 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2016, 19:46 PMThe amazing Chandler OKW got all this very good abilities for a very specific reason. They had resource penalties Incorrect assumption. Also could you please explain why okw is doing so bad when it's so OP? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer is on life support28 Jan 2016, 09:04 AM In any case, the 222 should at least be able to chase down snipers(it sucks dick at this) and counter some vehicles like the Quad and not be a free kill for T-70 or rifles. Of course with a cost increase included. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer is on life support28 Jan 2016, 07:43 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jan 2016, 06:26 AMGbpirate No, because of the caliber and armor penetrating qualities of the main gun, as well as the armor and firepower of the opposing vehicles (stuart/t70/aec). Like I said, best option is to have an interim P3 forcing players to make a decision weighing fast t3 or more stable mid game. The 2cm gun can penetrate Stuart, T-70 as well as the AEC. It could also penetrate the T-34 in the turret or sides. There was also a 222 variant with a 28mm that has penetrated an IS 2 in the front. Also the T-70 had 15 mm side armour. For comparison, the German K98 SMK H bullet had 19 mm of penetration. That's small arms fire penetrating the uber T-70 light tank. Zero reason not to buff the 222. In: COH2 Balance